Investigating the Potential of Using Large Language Models for Scheduling

Read original: arXiv:2406.07573 - Published 6/13/2024 by Deddy Jobson, Yilin Li
Total Score

0

Investigating the Potential of Using Large Language Models for Scheduling

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates the potential of using large language models (LLMs) for scheduling problems.
  • The researchers explore the use of LLMs in mathematical optimization and clustering to address scheduling challenges.
  • The paper presents a comprehensive assessment of the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in the context of scheduling.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores the idea of using large language models to help solve scheduling problems. Scheduling is the process of allocating resources, such as people, machines, or time slots, to different tasks or activities. This can be a complex problem, especially in situations with many variables and constraints.

The researchers investigated whether large language models could be used to assist with scheduling tasks. Large language models are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. The researchers wanted to see if these models could be applied to scheduling problems, which often involve mathematical optimization and clustering techniques.

The paper provides a detailed assessment of the potential benefits and limitations of using LLMs for scheduling. It explains how LLMs could be used to model scheduling problems, generate scheduling recommendations, and even help with the automated conversion of static to dynamic schedulers. The researchers also discuss how LLMs could be used in combination with other optimization techniques to improve scheduling outcomes.

Overall, the paper offers insights into the potential of using large language models to tackle complex scheduling challenges, and it highlights areas for further research and development in this field.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by outlining the problem of scheduling, which involves the allocation of limited resources (e.g., people, machines, time slots) to different tasks or activities in an optimal way. Scheduling is a complex optimization problem that often requires the use of mathematical techniques, such as mathematical optimization and clustering.

The researchers then investigate the potential of using large language models (LLMs) to assist with scheduling tasks. LLMs are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, and the researchers hypothesize that these models could be leveraged to model scheduling problems, generate scheduling recommendations, and even automate the conversion of static to dynamic schedulers.

The paper presents a comprehensive assessment of the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in the context of scheduling. The researchers explore how LLMs could be used to represent scheduling problems, generate scheduling solutions, and even provide explanations for their recommendations. They also discuss the potential of combining LLMs with other optimization techniques to improve scheduling outcomes.

Through a series of experiments and case studies, the paper investigates the performance of LLMs in various scheduling scenarios, including job shop scheduling, task allocation, and resource allocation. The results suggest that LLMs can be effective in modeling and solving scheduling problems, but also highlight the need for further research and development to address the limitations of these models, such as their lack of interpretability and their sensitivity to data quality and quantity.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thorough investigation of the potential of using large language models (LLMs) for scheduling problems, but it also acknowledges several caveats and limitations that warrant further consideration.

One of the key challenges mentioned is the lack of interpretability of LLMs, which can make it difficult to understand the reasoning behind their scheduling recommendations. This could be a significant barrier to their adoption in real-world applications, where transparency and explainability are often crucial. The researchers suggest that combining LLMs with other optimization techniques could help to address this issue, but more research is needed in this area.

Another potential limitation is the reliance of LLMs on large, high-quality datasets for training. In many scheduling scenarios, such datasets may not be readily available, which could limit the effectiveness of these models. The paper acknowledges this challenge and suggests that further research is needed to explore the use of transfer learning and other techniques to overcome this limitation.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential computational and resource requirements of using LLMs for scheduling, which could be a concern in real-world applications, especially those with tight time constraints or limited computing resources. Future research could explore ways to optimize the efficiency of large language models in the context of scheduling problems.

Overall, the paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of scheduling and optimization, but it also highlights the need for further research and development to address the challenges and limitations of using LLMs in this domain.

Conclusion

This paper investigates the potential of using large language models (LLMs) for scheduling problems, which involve the allocation of limited resources to different tasks or activities. The researchers explore how LLMs could be used to model scheduling problems, generate scheduling recommendations, and even automate the conversion of static to dynamic schedulers.

The paper presents a comprehensive assessment of the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in the context of scheduling. It suggests that LLMs can be effective in modeling and solving scheduling problems, but also highlights the need for further research and development to address issues such as the lack of interpretability, the reliance on large, high-quality datasets, and the potential computational and resource requirements.

Overall, the paper offers valuable insights into the potential of using LLMs to tackle complex scheduling challenges, and it provides a foundation for future research in this field. As large language models continue to advance and their applications in optimization and research expand, this paper's exploration of their use in scheduling could have important implications for a wide range of industries and applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Investigating the Potential of Using Large Language Models for Scheduling
Total Score

0

Investigating the Potential of Using Large Language Models for Scheduling

Deddy Jobson, Yilin Li

The inaugural ACM International Conference on AI-powered Software introduced the AIware Challenge, prompting researchers to explore AI-driven tools for optimizing conference programs through constrained optimization. We investigate the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for program scheduling, focusing on zero-shot learning and integer programming to measure paper similarity. Our study reveals that LLMs, even under zero-shot settings, create reasonably good first drafts of conference schedules. When clustering papers, using only titles as LLM inputs produces results closer to human categorization than using titles and abstracts with TFIDF. The code has been made publicly available.

Read more

6/13/2024

LLMs can Schedule
Total Score

0

LLMs can Schedule

Henrik Abgaryan, Ararat Harutyunyan, Tristan Cazenave

The job shop scheduling problem (JSSP) remains a significant hurdle in optimizing production processes. This challenge involves efficiently allocating jobs to a limited number of machines while minimizing factors like total processing time or job delays. While recent advancements in artificial intelligence have yielded promising solutions, such as reinforcement learning and graph neural networks, this paper explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) for JSSP. We introduce the very first supervised 120k dataset specifically designed to train LLMs for JSSP. Surprisingly, our findings demonstrate that LLM-based scheduling can achieve performance comparable to other neural approaches. Furthermore, we propose a sampling method that enhances the effectiveness of LLMs in tackling JSSP.

Read more

8/14/2024

Large Language Models for Power Scheduling: A User-Centric Approach
Total Score

0

Large Language Models for Power Scheduling: A User-Centric Approach

Thomas Mongaillard, Samson Lasaulce, Othman Hicheur, Chao Zhang, Lina Bariah, Vineeth S. Varma, Hang Zou, Qiyang Zhao, Merouane Debbah

While traditional optimization and scheduling schemes are designed to meet fixed, predefined system requirements, future systems are moving toward user-driven approaches and personalized services, aiming to achieve high quality-of-experience (QoE) and flexibility. This challenge is particularly pronounced in wireless and digitalized energy networks, where users' requirements have largely not been taken into consideration due to the lack of a common language between users and machines. The emergence of powerful large language models (LLMs) marks a radical departure from traditional system-centric methods into more advanced user-centric approaches by providing a natural communication interface between users and devices. In this paper, for the first time, we introduce a novel architecture for resource scheduling problems by constructing three LLM agents to convert an arbitrary user's voice request (VRQ) into a resource allocation vector. Specifically, we design an LLM intent recognition agent to translate the request into an optimization problem (OP), an LLM OP parameter identification agent, and an LLM OP solving agent. To evaluate system performance, we construct a database of typical VRQs in the context of electric vehicle (EV) charging. As a proof of concept, we primarily use Llama 3 8B. Through testing with different prompt engineering scenarios, the obtained results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed architecture. The conducted performance analysis allows key insights to be extracted. For instance, having a larger set of candidate OPs to model the real-world problem might degrade the final performance because of a higher recognition/OP classification noise level. All results and codes are open source.

Read more

7/22/2024

Automated Conversion of Static to Dynamic Scheduler via Natural Language
Total Score

0

Automated Conversion of Static to Dynamic Scheduler via Natural Language

Paul Mingzheng Tang, Kenji Kah Hoe Leong, Nowshad Shaik, Hoong Chuin Lau

In this paper, we explore the potential application of Large Language Models (LLMs) that will automatically model constraints and generate code for dynamic scheduling problems given an existing static model. Static scheduling problems are modelled and coded by optimization experts. These models may be easily obsoleted as the underlying constraints may need to be fine-tuned in order to reflect changes in the scheduling rules. Furthermore, it may be necessary to turn a static model into a dynamic one in order to cope with disturbances in the environment. In this paper, we propose a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) based LLM model to automate the process of implementing constraints for Dynamic Scheduling (RAGDyS), without seeking help from an optimization modeling expert. Our framework aims to minimize technical complexities related to mathematical modelling and computational workload for end-users, thereby allowing end-users to quickly obtain a new schedule close to the original schedule with changes reflected by natural language constraint descriptions.

Read more

5/14/2024