Investigating the Role of Cultural Values in Adopting Large Language Models for Software Engineering
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Software development is a socio-technical activity that involves the integration of people and technology.
- The adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) in software development exemplifies this socio-technical nature.
- While LLMs influence the development process, software development remains fundamentally human-centric, necessitating an investigation of the human factors in this adoption.
- This study explores the factors influencing the adoption of LLMs in software development, focusing on the role of professionals' cultural values.
Plain English Explanation
Software development is a complex process that involves both people and technology working together. The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into this process is a great example of how technology and human factors are closely interconnected.
While LLMs can certainly influence the software development process, the fundamental nature of this work remains centered around people. That's why it's important to understand the human factors that impact the adoption of LLMs in software development, such as the role of cultural values.
This study aims to explore the various factors that affect how software engineers adopt and use LLMs in their work. The researchers were particularly interested in understanding how the cultural values of these professionals might influence their acceptance and use of this new technology.
Technical Explanation
The researchers used the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) framework and Hofstede's cultural dimensions to investigate the adoption of LLMs by software engineers. They hypothesized that the cultural values of the professionals would moderate the relationships within the UTAUT2 framework, which includes factors like performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and habit.
Using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling, the researchers analyzed data from 188 software engineers. Their findings suggest that habit and performance expectancy are the primary drivers of LLM adoption, while cultural values do not significantly moderate this process.
Critical Analysis
The study provides valuable insights into the adoption of LLMs in software development, but it also has some limitations. The researchers acknowledge that their sample size was relatively small, and the study was conducted in a specific cultural context. Further research may be needed to understand how cultural factors might influence LLM adoption in different regions or organizations.
Additionally, the study did not deeply explore the potential challenges or concerns that software engineers may have with using LLMs in their work. Future research could delve into these issues and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the socio-technical dynamics involved in LLM adoption.
Conclusion
This study suggests that organizations can encourage the use of LLMs in software development by highlighting the performance and efficiency benefits of this technology, regardless of the cultural values of the professionals involved. Practical steps may include offering training programs, creating a supportive environment for regular use, and continuously tracking and sharing the performance improvements achieved through LLM adoption.
The findings highlight the importance of understanding the human factors in the adoption of emerging technologies like LLMs, which can have significant implications for the future of software development.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Investigating the Role of Cultural Values in Adopting Large Language Models for Software Engineering
Stefano Lambiase, Gemma Catolino, Fabio Palomba, Filomena Ferrucci, Daniel Russo
As a socio-technical activity, software development involves the close interconnection of people and technology. The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into this process exemplifies the socio-technical nature of software development. Although LLMs influence the development process, software development remains fundamentally human-centric, necessitating an investigation of the human factors in this adoption. Thus, with this study we explore the factors influencing the adoption of LLMs in software development, focusing on the role of professionals' cultural values. Guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) and Hofstede's cultural dimensions, we hypothesized that cultural values moderate the relationships within the UTAUT2 framework. Using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling and data from 188 software engineers, we found that habit and performance expectancy are the primary drivers of LLM adoption, while cultural values do not significantly moderate this process. These findings suggest that, by highlighting how LLMs can boost performance and efficiency, organizations can encourage their use, no matter the cultural differences. Practical steps include offering training programs to demonstrate LLM benefits, creating a supportive environment for regular use, and continuously tracking and sharing performance improvements from using LLMs.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Cultural Value Differences of LLMs: Prompt, Language, and Model Size
Qishuai Zhong, Yike Yun, Aixin Sun
Our study aims to identify behavior patterns in cultural values exhibited by large language models (LLMs). The studied variants include question ordering, prompting language, and model size. Our experiments reveal that each tested LLM can efficiently behave with different cultural values. More interestingly: (i) LLMs exhibit relatively consistent cultural values when presented with prompts in a single language. (ii) The prompting language e.g., Chinese or English, can influence the expression of cultural values. The same question can elicit divergent cultural values when the same LLM is queried in a different language. (iii) Differences in sizes of the same model (e.g., Llama2-7B vs 13B vs 70B) have a more significant impact on their demonstrated cultural values than model differences (e.g., Llama2 vs Mixtral). Our experiments reveal that query language and model size of LLM are the main factors resulting in cultural value differences.
Read more7/25/2024
0
Investigating Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models
Badr AlKhamissi, Muhammad ElNokrashy, Mai AlKhamissi, Mona Diab
The intricate relationship between language and culture has long been a subject of exploration within the realm of linguistic anthropology. Large Language Models (LLMs), promoted as repositories of collective human knowledge, raise a pivotal question: do these models genuinely encapsulate the diverse knowledge adopted by different cultures? Our study reveals that these models demonstrate greater cultural alignment along two dimensions -- firstly, when prompted with the dominant language of a specific culture, and secondly, when pretrained with a refined mixture of languages employed by that culture. We quantify cultural alignment by simulating sociological surveys, comparing model responses to those of actual survey participants as references. Specifically, we replicate a survey conducted in various regions of Egypt and the United States through prompting LLMs with different pretraining data mixtures in both Arabic and English with the personas of the real respondents and the survey questions. Further analysis reveals that misalignment becomes more pronounced for underrepresented personas and for culturally sensitive topics, such as those probing social values. Finally, we introduce Anthropological Prompting, a novel method leveraging anthropological reasoning to enhance cultural alignment. Our study emphasizes the necessity for a more balanced multilingual pretraining dataset to better represent the diversity of human experience and the plurality of different cultures with many implications on the topic of cross-lingual transfer.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Insights from Social Shaping Theory: The Appropriation of Large Language Models in an Undergraduate Programming Course
Aadarsh Padiyath, Xinying Hou, Amy Pang, Diego Viramontes Vargas, Xingjian Gu, Tamara Nelson-Fromm, Zihan Wu, Mark Guzdial, Barbara Ericson
The capability of large language models (LLMs) to generate, debug, and explain code has sparked the interest of researchers and educators in undergraduate programming, with many anticipating their transformative potential in programming education. However, decisions about why and how to use LLMs in programming education may involve more than just the assessment of an LLM's technical capabilities. Using the social shaping of technology theory as a guiding framework, our study explores how students' social perceptions influence their own LLM usage. We then examine the correlation of self-reported LLM usage with students' self-efficacy and midterm performances in an undergraduate programming course. Triangulating data from an anonymous end-of-course student survey (n = 158), a mid-course self-efficacy survey (n=158), student interviews (n = 10), self-reported LLM usage on homework, and midterm performances, we discovered that students' use of LLMs was associated with their expectations for their future careers and their perceptions of peer usage. Additionally, early self-reported LLM usage in our context correlated with lower self-efficacy and lower midterm scores, while students' perceived over-reliance on LLMs, rather than their usage itself, correlated with decreased self-efficacy later in the course.
Read more6/11/2024