Joint Parameter and Parameterization Inference with Uncertainty Quantification through Differentiable Programming
2403.02215
0
0
Abstract
Accurate representations of unknown and sub-grid physical processes through parameterizations (or closure) in numerical simulations with quantified uncertainty are critical for resolving the coarse-grained partial differential equations that govern many problems ranging from weather and climate prediction to turbulence simulations. Recent advances have seen machine learning (ML) increasingly applied to model these subgrid processes, resulting in the development of hybrid physics-ML models through the integration with numerical solvers. In this work, we introduce a novel framework for the joint estimation of physical parameters and machine learning parameterizations with uncertainty quantification. Our framework incorporates online training and efficient Bayesian inference within a high-dimensional parameter space, facilitated by differentiable programming. This proof of concept underscores the substantial potential of differentiable programming in synergistically combining machine learning with differential equations, thereby enhancing the capabilities of hybrid physics-ML modeling.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach for joint parameter and parameterization inference with uncertainty quantification, using a technique called "differentiable programming".
- The method allows for the simultaneous estimation of model parameters and the functional form of the underlying parameterization, along with rigorous uncertainty quantification.
- It is particularly useful for complex physical systems where the functional form of the parameterization is unknown or difficult to specify a priori.
Plain English Explanation
This paper introduces a new way to tackle a common problem in scientific modeling and simulation. Often, when trying to model complex physical systems, researchers need to make simplifying assumptions by using "parameterizations" - mathematical functions that represent the effects of small-scale processes that can't be fully resolved in the model.
The challenge is that the right form for these parameterizations is often not known ahead of time. Traditionally, researchers would have to make an educated guess, and then try to adjust the parameters of that guess to fit the data. This can be a tedious and error-prone process.
The approach presented in this paper allows researchers to do something more powerful - to simultaneously figure out the best parameterization
By automating this process, the new method can save researchers a lot of time and effort, while also providing them with a better understanding of the underlying uncertainties in their models. This could lead to significant improvements in the accuracy and reliability of scientific simulations across many different fields.
Technical Explanation
The core idea of the paper is to formulate the joint inference of model parameters and the parameterization function as an optimization problem, which can be solved using gradient-based techniques enabled by differentiable programming.
The authors start by defining a general class of physical models that depend on both model parameters and a parameterization function. They then show how to construct a loss function that captures the discrepancy between model predictions and observed data, while also penalizing deviations from a prior belief about the parameterization function.
By using automatic differentiation, the gradients of this loss function with respect to both the model parameters and the parameters defining the parameterization function can be efficiently computed. This allows the authors to jointly optimize for both sets of quantities, starting from some initial guesses.
Importantly, the authors also show how to leverage the gradient information to quantify the uncertainty in the inferred parameters and parameterization, using techniques like Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling.
The paper demonstrates the efficacy of the approach on several benchmark problems, including applications in fluid dynamics and climate modeling. The results indicate that the joint inference method can significantly outperform traditional approaches that treat the parameterization as fixed.
Critical Analysis
The key strength of this work is the systematic way it addresses the challenging problem of jointly inferring model parameters and the underlying parameterization function, while also providing rigorous uncertainty quantification. This is a significant advance over traditional approaches that treat the parameterization as a fixed, known entity.
One potential limitation is the computational cost of the optimization and uncertainty quantification procedures, which may be prohibitive for very large-scale models. The authors briefly discuss strategies for addressing this, such as using efficient numerical methods and parallelization, but more work may be needed to scale the approach to truly massive simulations.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed discussion of the theoretical properties of the optimization problem, such as convexity, convergence guarantees, or sensitivity to hyperparameter choices. A more thorough analysis of these aspects could help users better understand the strengths and limitations of the method.
Overall, however, this is a highly promising piece of research that could have a significant impact on how complex physical models are developed and applied in a wide range of scientific domains. The ability to automatically infer both model parameters and parameterization functions, while quantifying the associated uncertainties, is a powerful capability that warrants further exploration and refinement.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for joint parameter and parameterization inference with uncertainty quantification, using the technique of differentiable programming. The method allows researchers to simultaneously determine the best set of model parameters and the functional form of the underlying parameterization, while also providing rigorous estimates of the associated uncertainties.
By automating this process, the new approach can save researchers significant time and effort compared to traditional trial-and-error methods, while also leading to more accurate and reliable scientific simulations. The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the method on several benchmark problems, and the authors discuss strategies for scaling the approach to large-scale models.
Overall, this research represents an important advancement in the field of scientific modeling and simulation, with the potential to drive significant improvements across many different domains that rely on complex physical models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Leveraging viscous Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learning
Zongren Zou, Tingwei Meng, Paula Chen, J'er^ome Darbon, George Em Karniadakis
0
0
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in scientific machine learning (SciML) combines the powerful predictive power of SciML with methods for quantifying the reliability of the learned models. However, two major challenges remain: limited interpretability and expensive training procedures. We provide a new interpretation for UQ problems by establishing a new theoretical connection between some Bayesian inference problems arising in SciML and viscous Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential equations (HJ PDEs). Namely, we show that the posterior mean and covariance can be recovered from the spatial gradient and Hessian of the solution to a viscous HJ PDE. As a first exploration of this connection, we specialize to Bayesian inference problems with linear models, Gaussian likelihoods, and Gaussian priors. In this case, the associated viscous HJ PDEs can be solved using Riccati ODEs, and we develop a new Riccati-based methodology that provides computational advantages when continuously updating the model predictions. Specifically, our Riccati-based approach can efficiently add or remove data points to the training set invariant to the order of the data and continuously tune hyperparameters. Moreover, neither update requires retraining on or access to previously incorporated data. We provide several examples from SciML involving noisy data and textit{epistemic uncertainty} to illustrate the potential advantages of our approach. In particular, this approach's amenability to data streaming applications demonstrates its potential for real-time inferences, which, in turn, allows for applications in which the predicted uncertainty is used to dynamically alter the learning process.
4/16/2024
Assessment of Uncertainty Quantification in Universal Differential Equations
Nina Schmid, David Fernandes del Pozo, Willem Waegeman, Jan Hasenauer
0
0
Scientific Machine Learning is a new class of approaches that integrate physical knowledge and mechanistic models with data-driven techniques for uncovering governing equations of complex processes. Among the available approaches, Universal Differential Equations (UDEs) are used to combine prior knowledge in the form of mechanistic formulations with universal function approximators, like neural networks. Integral to the efficacy of UDEs is the joint estimation of parameters within mechanistic formulations and the universal function approximators using empirical data. The robustness and applicability of resultant models, however, hinge upon the rigorous quantification of uncertainties associated with these parameters, as well as the predictive capabilities of the overall model or its constituent components. With this work, we provide a formalisation of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for UDEs and investigate important frequentist and Bayesian methods. By analysing three synthetic examples of varying complexity, we evaluate the validity and efficiency of ensembles, variational inference and Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling as epistemic UQ methods for UDEs.
6/14/2024
Physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion for scientific machine learning and uncertainty quantification
Himanshu Sharma, Luk'av{s} Nov'ak, Michael D. Shields
0
0
We present a novel physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion as a surrogate modeling method capable of performing both scientific machine learning (SciML) and uncertainty quantification (UQ) tasks. The proposed method possesses a unique capability: it seamlessly integrates SciML into UQ and vice versa, which allows it to quantify the uncertainties in SciML tasks effectively and leverage SciML for improved uncertainty assessment during UQ-related tasks. The proposed surrogate model can effectively incorporate a variety of physical constraints, such as governing partial differential equations (PDEs) with associated initial and boundary conditions constraints, inequality-type constraints (e.g., monotonicity, convexity, non-negativity, among others), and additional a priori information in the training process to supplement limited data. This ensures physically realistic predictions and significantly reduces the need for expensive computational model evaluations to train the surrogate model. Furthermore, the proposed method has a built-in uncertainty quantification (UQ) feature to efficiently estimate output uncertainties. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we apply it to a diverse set of problems, including linear/non-linear PDEs with deterministic and stochastic parameters, data-driven surrogate modeling of a complex physical system, and UQ of a stochastic system with parameters modeled as random fields.
5/14/2024
Towards Physically Consistent Deep Learning For Climate Model Parameterizations
Birgit Kuhbacher, Fernando Iglesias-Suarez, Niki Kilbertus, Veronika Eyring
0
0
Climate models play a critical role in understanding and projecting climate change. Due to their complexity, their horizontal resolution of ~40-100 km remains too coarse to resolve processes such as clouds and convection, which need to be approximated via parameterizations. These parameterizations are a major source of systematic errors and large uncertainties in climate projections. Deep learning (DL)-based parameterizations, trained on computationally expensive, short high-resolution simulations, have shown great promise for improving climate models in that regard. However, their lack of interpretability and tendency to learn spurious non-physical correlations result in reduced trust in the climate simulation. We propose an efficient supervised learning framework for DL-based parameterizations that leads to physically consistent models with improved interpretability and negligible computational overhead compared to standard supervised training. First, key features determining the target physical processes are uncovered. Subsequently, the neural network is fine-tuned using only those relevant features. We show empirically that our method robustly identifies a small subset of the inputs as actual physical drivers, therefore, removing spurious non-physical relationships. This results in by design physically consistent and interpretable neural networks while maintaining the predictive performance of standard black-box DL-based parameterizations. Our framework represents a crucial step in addressing a major challenge in data-driven climate model parameterizations by respecting the underlying physical processes, and may also benefit physically consistent deep learning in other research fields.
6/7/2024