Justice in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence in Africa

Read original: arXiv:2406.10653 - Published 6/18/2024 by Aloysius Ochasi, Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Russ B. Altman
Total Score

0

🎯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper discusses the benefits and risks of using artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, particularly in resource-constrained settings like Africa.
  • AI has the potential to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and accessibility of healthcare services, but its development and use also raise ethical, legal, and socio-economic concerns.
  • The paper focuses on the concept of justice and how AI can amplify social inequities, and it explores related principles like solidarity, the Common Good, sustainability, AI bias, and fairness.
  • The paper argues that for Africa to effectively benefit from AI in healthcare, these principles must be aligned with the local context while balancing the risks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines the debate around the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare. AI has the potential to improve healthcare in many ways, such as making services more effective, efficient, and accessible, especially in places with limited healthcare resources like much of Africa. However, the development and use of AI-based healthcare systems also raise a lot of concerns.

One major issue is justice and how AI can worsen social inequalities. AI systems can be biased or unfair, and this can have serious consequences when used in critical areas like healthcare. The paper looks at other related principles, like the idea of "solidarity" (everyone working together for the common good) and "sustainability" (making sure the benefits of AI are long-lasting).

The key point is that for AI to be truly helpful in African healthcare, these justice-related principles need to be carefully considered and balanced against the risks. This is different from the more general ethical debates around AI, as it requires understanding the specific context and challenges faced in resource-constrained settings like much of Africa.

Technical Explanation

The paper discusses the potential benefits and risks of using artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare delivery and patient outcomes, particularly in resource-constrained settings such as Africa. The authors argue that while AI can improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and accessibility of healthcare services, its development and use raise numerous ethical, legal, and socio-economic issues.

The core focus of the paper is on the concept of justice and how AI can amplify social inequities. The authors explore related principles such as solidarity, the Common Good, sustainability, AI bias, and fairness. They suggest that for Africa to effectively benefit from AI in healthcare, these principles must be aligned with the local context while balancing the risks.

Compared to mainstream ethical debates on justice, the paper offers context-specific considerations for equitable healthcare AI development in Africa. This includes addressing issues of fairness and bias in AI systems and ensuring the long-term sustainability and common good of AI-driven healthcare innovations.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important considerations around the use of AI in healthcare, particularly in resource-constrained settings like Africa. The authors rightly highlight the potential benefits of AI, such as improved accessibility and efficiency, but also emphasize the significant ethical, legal, and socio-economic challenges that must be addressed.

The focus on justice and related principles like solidarity and the Common Good is well-justified, as these are crucial factors that are often overlooked in more general discussions of AI ethics. The authors provide a nuanced perspective that considers the specific contextual factors relevant to Africa, which is a valuable contribution to the literature.

However, the paper could have delved deeper into some of the practical implementation challenges and potential mitigation strategies. For example, it could have explored in more detail how to ensure AI systems are designed to be fair and unbiased, or how to foster collaboration and solidarity among diverse stakeholders.

Additionally, the paper could have considered other important factors, such as data privacy and security, the impact of AI on healthcare jobs and workflows, and the role of regulations and governance frameworks in guiding the development and use of AI in healthcare.

Conclusion

This paper offers a thought-provoking perspective on the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare, particularly in resource-constrained settings like Africa. It highlights the significant potential benefits of AI, such as improved effectiveness, efficiency, and accessibility of healthcare services, but also the complex ethical, legal, and socio-economic issues that must be carefully navigated.

The paper's focus on the concept of justice and related principles like solidarity, the Common Good, and fairness is a valuable contribution to the ongoing debate around the responsible development and deployment of AI. By considering the specific contextual factors relevant to Africa, the authors provide a nuanced and context-specific approach to ensuring that the benefits of healthcare AI are equitably distributed and the risks are effectively managed.

As AI continues to play an increasingly critical role in healthcare, this paper serves as an important reminder that technological progress must be balanced with a deep understanding of the local context and a commitment to prioritizing the well-being of all members of society.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🎯

Total Score

0

Justice in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence in Africa

Aloysius Ochasi, Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Russ B. Altman

There is an ongoing debate on balancing the benefits and risks of artificial intelligence (AI) as AI is becoming critical to improving healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. Such improvements are essential in resource-constrained settings where millions lack access to adequate healthcare services, such as in Africa. AI in such a context can potentially improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and accessibility of healthcare services. Nevertheless, the development and use of AI-driven healthcare systems raise numerous ethical, legal, and socio-economic issues. Justice is a major concern in AI that has implications for amplifying social inequities. This paper discusses these implications and related justice concepts such as solidarity, Common Good, sustainability, AI bias, and fairness. For Africa to effectively benefit from AI, these principles should align with the local context while balancing the risks. Compared to mainstream ethical debates on justice, this perspective offers context-specific considerations for equitable healthcare AI development in Africa.

Read more

6/18/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Data Ethics in the Era of Healthcare Artificial Intelligence in Africa: An Ubuntu Philosophy Perspective

Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Aloysius Ochasi, Russ B. Altman

Data are essential in developing healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) systems. However, patient data collection, access, and use raise ethical concerns, including informed consent, data bias, data protection and privacy, data ownership, and benefit sharing. Various ethical frameworks have been proposed to ensure the ethical use of healthcare data and AI, however, these frameworks often align with Western cultural values, social norms, and institutional contexts emphasizing individual autonomy and well-being. Ethical guidelines must reflect political and cultural settings to account for cultural diversity, inclusivity, and historical factors such as colonialism. Thus, this paper discusses healthcare data ethics in the AI era in Africa from the Ubuntu philosophy perspective. It focuses on the contrast between individualistic and communitarian approaches to data ethics. The proposed framework could inform stakeholders, including AI developers, healthcare providers, the public, and policy-makers about healthcare data ethical usage in AI in Africa.

Read more

6/17/2024

Total Score

0

AI-Driven Healthcare: A Survey on Ensuring Fairness and Mitigating Bias

Sribala Vidyadhari Chinta, Zichong Wang, Xingyu Zhang, Thang Doan Viet, Ayesha Kashif, Monique Antoinette Smith, Wenbin Zhang

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly advancing in healthcare, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of services across various specialties, including cardiology, ophthalmology, dermatology, emergency medicine, etc. AI applications have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, treatment personalization, and patient outcome predictions by leveraging technologies such as machine learning, neural networks, and natural language processing. However, these advancements also introduce substantial ethical and fairness challenges, particularly related to biases in data and algorithms. These biases can lead to disparities in healthcare delivery, affecting diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes across different demographic groups. This survey paper examines the integration of AI in healthcare, highlighting critical challenges related to bias and exploring strategies for mitigation. We emphasize the necessity of diverse datasets, fairness-aware algorithms, and regulatory frameworks to ensure equitable healthcare delivery. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research, advocating for interdisciplinary approaches, transparency in AI decision-making, and the development of innovative and inclusive AI applications.

Read more

7/30/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Towards Clinical AI Fairness: Filling Gaps in the Puzzle

Mingxuan Liu, Yilin Ning, Salinelat Teixayavong, Xiaoxuan Liu, Mayli Mertens, Yuqing Shang, Xin Li, Di Miao, Jie Xu, Daniel Shu Wei Ting, Lionel Tim-Ee Cheng, Jasmine Chiat Ling Ong, Zhen Ling Teo, Ting Fang Tan, Narrendar RaviChandran, Fei Wang, Leo Anthony Celi, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Nan Liu

The ethical integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare necessitates addressing fairness-a concept that is highly context-specific across medical fields. Extensive studies have been conducted to expand the technical components of AI fairness, while tremendous calls for AI fairness have been raised from healthcare. Despite this, a significant disconnect persists between technical advancements and their practical clinical applications, resulting in a lack of contextualized discussion of AI fairness in clinical settings. Through a detailed evidence gap analysis, our review systematically pinpoints several deficiencies concerning both healthcare data and the provided AI fairness solutions. We highlight the scarcity of research on AI fairness in many medical domains where AI technology is increasingly utilized. Additionally, our analysis highlights a substantial reliance on group fairness, aiming to ensure equality among demographic groups from a macro healthcare system perspective; in contrast, individual fairness, focusing on equity at a more granular level, is frequently overlooked. To bridge these gaps, our review advances actionable strategies for both the healthcare and AI research communities. Beyond applying existing AI fairness methods in healthcare, we further emphasize the importance of involving healthcare professionals to refine AI fairness concepts and methods to ensure contextually relevant and ethically sound AI applications in healthcare.

Read more

5/29/2024