KaMPIng: Flexible and (Near) Zero-overhead C++ Bindings for MPI

Read original: arXiv:2404.05610 - Published 8/26/2024 by Tim Niklas Uhl, Matthias Schimek, Lukas Hubner, Demian Hespe, Florian Kurpicz, Christoph Stelz, Peter Sanders
Total Score

0

KaMPIng: Flexible and (Near) Zero-overhead C++ Bindings for MPI

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

• This paper introduces KaMPIng, a flexible and low-overhead C++ binding for the Message Passing Interface (MPI) library, a widely used framework for parallel programming. • The primary goals of KaMPIng are to provide a modern C++ interface for MPI that is easy to use, while also maintaining near-zero overhead compared to the native C-based MPI API. • The research was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the Horizon 2020 program.

Plain English Explanation

MPI is a popular library used by programmers to write parallel programs that can run on multiple computers or processors at the same time. However, the standard MPI API is based on the C programming language, which can be cumbersome to use for developers who prefer to work in C++.

KaMPIng aims to address this issue by creating a new C++ interface for MPI that is more intuitive and easier to use, while still providing the same performance as the original C-based API. The key ideas behind KaMPIng are:

  1. Flexibility: The library allows developers to choose the level of abstraction they prefer, from low-level direct access to the MPI functions to higher-level, object-oriented interfaces.
  2. Low Overhead: KaMPIng is designed to have minimal impact on performance compared to using the native C MPI API, ensuring that parallel programs do not suffer a significant slowdown when switching to the C++ bindings.

By providing a modern C++ interface for MPI, KaMPIng aims to make parallel programming more accessible and approachable for developers who prefer to work in C++, while still maintaining the efficiency and performance of the original MPI library.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces KaMPIng: Flexible and (Near) Zero-overhead C++Bindings for MPI, a new C++ interface for the widely-used Message Passing Interface (MPI) library. MPI is a popular framework for writing parallel programs that can run across multiple computers or processors, but its standard API is based on the C programming language, which can be cumbersome for C++ developers to use.

KaMPIng addresses this issue by providing a C++ binding for MPI that maintains a near-zero overhead compared to the native C-based MPI API, while offering a more flexible and intuitive interface for C++ programmers. The library allows developers to choose the level of abstraction they prefer, from low-level direct access to the MPI functions to higher-level, object-oriented interfaces.

The paper presents the design and implementation of KaMPIng, which includes several key features:

  1. Automatic Type Deduction: KaMPIng uses C++11 features like auto and template type deduction to simplify the syntax and reduce boilerplate code when working with MPI data types.
  2. Unified Error Handling: The library provides a consistent error handling mechanism that integrates with the C++ exception handling system, making it easier to write robust parallel programs.
  3. Performance Optimization: The authors have carefully designed KaMPIng to minimize overhead and maintain performance parity with the native C MPI API, using techniques like [object Object] and [object Object].

The paper also includes an evaluation of KaMPIng's performance, demonstrating that it achieves near-zero overhead compared to the C-based MPI API across a range of benchmark scenarios, including point-to-point communication, collective operations, and the [object Object].

Critical Analysis

The KaMPIng paper presents a promising approach to improving the usability of MPI for C++ developers, while maintaining the performance characteristics of the original C-based API. The authors have clearly put a lot of thought into the design and implementation of the library, and their evaluation results are encouraging.

However, the paper does not discuss some potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, it would be interesting to see how KaMPIng's performance and ease of use compares to other C++ bindings for MPI, such as [object Object] or [object Object]. Additionally, the paper does not address how KaMPIng might integrate with other modern C++ features and libraries, such as [object Object] or [object Object].

Overall, the KaMPIng paper presents a compelling approach to improving the C++ experience for MPI developers, and the authors have clearly put a lot of thought and effort into the design and implementation of the library. However, further research and comparison to other solutions could help to better understand the strengths and limitations of the KaMPIng approach.

Conclusion

The KaMPIng paper introduces a new C++ binding for the popular MPI parallel programming library, with the goal of providing a more flexible and intuitive interface for C++ developers while maintaining near-zero overhead compared to the original C-based API.

The key innovations of KaMPIng include automatic type deduction, unified error handling, and careful performance optimization through techniques like function overloading and template metaprogramming. The authors' evaluation results are promising, demonstrating that KaMPIng can achieve performance parity with the native C MPI API across a range of benchmark scenarios.

By making parallel programming more accessible and approachable for C++ developers, KaMPIng has the potential to significantly impact the field of high-performance computing and scientific computing, where MPI is widely used. Further research and comparison to other C++ MPI bindings could help to better understand the strengths and limitations of the KaMPIng approach.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

KaMPIng: Flexible and (Near) Zero-overhead C++ Bindings for MPI
Total Score

0

KaMPIng: Flexible and (Near) Zero-overhead C++ Bindings for MPI

Tim Niklas Uhl, Matthias Schimek, Lukas Hubner, Demian Hespe, Florian Kurpicz, Christoph Stelz, Peter Sanders

The Message-Passing Interface (MPI) and C++ form the backbone of high-performance computing, but MPI only provides C and Fortran bindings. While this offers great language interoperability, high-level programming languages like C++ make software development quicker and less error-prone. We propose novel C++ language bindings that cover all abstraction levels from low-level MPI calls to convenient STL-style bindings, where most parameters are inferred from a small subset of parameters, by bringing named parameters to C++. This enables rapid prototyping and fine-tuning runtime behavior and memory management. A flexible type system and additional safety guarantees help to prevent programming errors. By exploiting C++'s template metaprogramming capabilities, this has (near) zero overhead, as only required code paths are generated at compile time. We demonstrate that our library is a strong foundation for a future distributed standard library using multiple application benchmarks, ranging from text-book sorting algorithms to phylogenetic interference.

Read more

8/26/2024

Towards a Scalable and Efficient PGAS-based Distributed OpenMP
Total Score

0

Towards a Scalable and Efficient PGAS-based Distributed OpenMP

Baodi Shan, Mauricio Araya-Polo, Barbara Chapman

MPI+X has been the de facto standard for distributed memory parallel programming. It is widely used primarily as an explicit two-sided communication model, which often leads to complex and error-prone code. Alternatively, PGAS model utilizes efficient one-sided communication and more intuitive communication primitives. In this paper, we present a novel approach that integrates PGAS concepts into the OpenMP programming model, leveraging the LLVM compiler infrastructure and the GASNet-EX communication library. Our model addresses the complexity associated with traditional MPI+OpenMP programming models while ensuring excellent performance and scalability. We evaluate our approach using a set of micro-benchmarks and application kernels on two distinct platforms: Ookami from Stony Brook University and NERSC Perlmutter. The results demonstrate that DiOMP achieves superior bandwidth and lower latency compared to MPI+OpenMP, up to 25% higher bandwidth and down to 45% on latency. DiOMP offers a promising alternative to the traditional MPI+OpenMP hybrid programming model, towards providing a more productive and efficient way to develop high-performance parallel applications for distributed memory systems.

Read more

9/5/2024

📊

Total Score

0

A More Scalable Sparse Dynamic Data Exchange

Andrew Geyko, Gerald Collom, Derek Schafer, Patrick Bridges, Amanda Bienz

Parallel architectures are continually increasing in performance and scale, while underlying algorithmic infrastructure often fail to take full advantage of available compute power. Within the context of MPI, irregular communication patterns create bottlenecks in parallel applications. One common bottleneck is the sparse dynamic data exchange, often required when forming communication patterns within applications. There are a large variety of approaches for these dynamic exchanges, with optimizations implemented directly in parallel applications. This paper proposes a novel API within an MPI extension library, allowing for applications to utilize the variety of provided optimizations for sparse dynamic data exchange methods. Further, the paper presents novel locality-aware sparse dynamic data exchange algorithms. Finally, performance results show significant speedups up to 20x with the novel locality-aware algorithms.

Read more

4/4/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

MPIrigen: MPI Code Generation through Domain-Specific Language Models

Nadav Schneider, Niranjan Hasabnis, Vy A. Vo, Tal Kadosh, Neva Krien, Mihai Capotu{a}, Guy Tamir, Ted Willke, Nesreen Ahmed, Yuval Pinter, Timothy Mattson, Gal Oren

The imperative need to scale computation across numerous nodes highlights the significance of efficient parallel computing, particularly in the realm of Message Passing Interface (MPI) integration. The challenging parallel programming task of generating MPI-based parallel programs has remained unexplored. This study first investigates the performance of state-of-the-art language models in generating MPI-based parallel programs. Findings reveal that widely used models such as GPT-3.5 and PolyCoder (specialized multi-lingual code models) exhibit notable performance degradation, when generating MPI-based programs compared to general-purpose programs. In contrast, domain-specific models such as MonoCoder, which are pretrained on MPI-related programming languages of C and C++, outperform larger models. Subsequently, we introduce a dedicated downstream task of MPI-based program generation by fine-tuning MonoCoder on HPCorpusMPI. We call the resulting model as MPIrigen. We propose an innovative preprocessing for completion only after observing the whole code, thus enabling better completion with a wider context. Comparative analysis against GPT-3.5 zero-shot performance, using a novel HPC-oriented evaluation method, demonstrates that MPIrigen excels in generating accurate MPI functions up to 0.8 accuracy in location and function predictions, and with more than 0.9 accuracy for argument predictions. The success of this tailored solution underscores the importance of domain-specific fine-tuning in optimizing language models for parallel computing code generation, paving the way for a new generation of automatic parallelization tools. The sources of this work are available at our GitHub MPIrigen repository: https://github.com/Scientific-Computing-Lab-NRCN/MPI-rigen

Read more

4/24/2024