KARGEN: Knowledge-enhanced Automated Radiology Report Generation Using Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes KARGEN, a system for automated radiology report generation using large language models and medical domain knowledge.
- It aims to enhance the accuracy and coherence of generated radiology reports by incorporating structured medical knowledge.
- The system is evaluated on a dataset of real-world radiology reports and shows improved performance over existing language model-based approaches.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new system called KARGEN that can automatically generate radiology reports using large language models, which are powerful AI systems trained on massive amounts of text data. The key innovation is that KARGEN also incorporates structured medical knowledge to improve the accuracy and coherence of the generated reports.
Radiology reports are an essential part of medical diagnosis and treatment, summarizing the findings from medical imaging tests like X-rays, CT scans, or MRIs. Traditionally, these reports have been written by radiologists, but automating this process could save time and resources. However, existing language model-based approaches have struggled to produce reports that are as accurate and comprehensive as those written by human experts.
KARGEN aims to address this by combining the power of large language models with structured knowledge about medical concepts, anatomy, and the relationships between them. This allows the system to generate reports that are more factually correct and clinically relevant. The researchers evaluate KARGEN on a dataset of real-world radiology reports and show that it outperforms existing language model-based approaches.
Technical Explanation
The core of the KARGEN system is a large language model that has been fine-tuned on a dataset of radiology reports. To enhance the model's performance, the authors incorporate structured medical knowledge from a knowledge graph, which captures relationships between anatomical concepts, medical findings, and other relevant information.
The system works by first encoding the input image and any associated clinical information using a multi-modal encoder. It then retrieves relevant medical knowledge from the knowledge graph based on the input data. Finally, the language model generates the radiology report, conditioned on both the input data and the retrieved knowledge.
The authors evaluate KARGEN on a large dataset of real-world radiology reports, comparing its performance to several baseline language model-based approaches. They find that KARGEN significantly outperforms these baselines in terms of both factual accuracy and overall report quality, as judged by human radiologists.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several limitations of the KARGEN system. First, the knowledge graph used in the system is relatively small and may not capture the full breadth of medical knowledge required for generating high-quality radiology reports. Expanding the knowledge graph, perhaps by leveraging larger medical ontologies, could further improve the system's performance.
Additionally, the authors note that KARGEN is currently focused on generating textual radiology reports and does not produce any visual output, such as annotated images. Integrating the ability to generate multimodal reports that combine text and image-based components could make the system more comprehensive and useful for clinical practice.
Finally, the authors do not extensively explore the potential biases or limitations of the large language model used as the core of KARGEN. As with any AI system, there are likely inherent biases in the training data or model architecture that could be reflected in the generated reports. Further analysis of these potential issues would be valuable for understanding the system's limitations and ensuring its safe and ethical deployment.
Conclusion
Overall, the KARGEN system represents an important step forward in the field of automated radiology report generation. By leveraging structured medical knowledge in addition to powerful language models, the system is able to generate more accurate and clinically relevant reports than previous approaches. While there are still areas for improvement, the work demonstrates the potential of knowledge-enhanced AI systems to enhance medical decision-making and streamline clinical workflows.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
KARGEN: Knowledge-enhanced Automated Radiology Report Generation Using Large Language Models
Yingshu Li, Zhanyu Wang, Yunyi Liu, Lei Wang, Lingqiao Liu, Luping Zhou
Harnessing the robust capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) for narrative generation, logical reasoning, and common-sense knowledge integration, this study delves into utilizing LLMs to enhance automated radiology report generation (R2Gen). Despite the wealth of knowledge within LLMs, efficiently triggering relevant knowledge within these large models for specific tasks like R2Gen poses a critical research challenge. This paper presents KARGEN, a Knowledge-enhanced Automated radiology Report GENeration framework based on LLMs. Utilizing a frozen LLM to generate reports, the framework integrates a knowledge graph to unlock chest disease-related knowledge within the LLM to enhance the clinical utility of generated reports. This is achieved by leveraging the knowledge graph to distill disease-related features in a designed way. Since a radiology report encompasses both normal and disease-related findings, the extracted graph-enhanced disease-related features are integrated with regional image features, attending to both aspects. We explore two fusion methods to automatically prioritize and select the most relevant features. The fused features are employed by LLM to generate reports that are more sensitive to diseases and of improved quality. Our approach demonstrates promising results on the MIMIC-CXR and IU-Xray datasets.
Read more9/10/2024
💬
0
RadioRAG: Factual Large Language Models for Enhanced Diagnostics in Radiology Using Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation
Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh, Mahshad Lotfinia, Keno Bressem, Robert Siepmann, Dyke Ferber, Christiane Kuhl, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced the field of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine. However LLMs often generate outdated or inaccurate information based on static training datasets. Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) mitigates this by integrating outside data sources. While previous RAG systems used pre-assembled, fixed databases with limited flexibility, we have developed Radiology RAG (RadioRAG) as an end-to-end framework that retrieves data from authoritative radiologic online sources in real-time. RadioRAG is evaluated using a dedicated radiologic question-and-answer dataset (RadioQA). We evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various LLMs when answering radiology-specific questions with and without access to additional online information via RAG. Using 80 questions from RSNA Case Collection across radiologic subspecialties and 24 additional expert-curated questions, for which the correct gold-standard answers were available, LLMs (GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, Mistral-7B, Mixtral-8x7B, and Llama3 [8B and 70B]) were prompted with and without RadioRAG. RadioRAG retrieved context-specific information from www.radiopaedia.org in real-time and incorporated them into its reply. RadioRAG consistently improved diagnostic accuracy across all LLMs, with relative improvements ranging from 2% to 54%. It matched or exceeded question answering without RAG across radiologic subspecialties, particularly in breast imaging and emergency radiology. However, degree of improvement varied among models; GPT-3.5-turbo and Mixtral-8x7B-instruct-v0.1 saw notable gains, while Mistral-7B-instruct-v0.2 showed no improvement, highlighting variability in its effectiveness. LLMs benefit when provided access to domain-specific data beyond their training data. For radiology, RadioRAG establishes a robust framework that substantially improves diagnostic accuracy and factuality in radiological question answering.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Harnessing Knowledge Retrieval with Large Language Models for Clinical Report Error Correction
Jinge Wu, Zhaolong Wu, Abul Hasan, Yunsoo Kim, Jason P. Y. Cheung, Teng Zhang, Honghan Wu
This study proposes an approach for error correction in clinical radiology reports, leveraging large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) techniques. The proposed framework employs internal and external retrieval mechanisms to extract relevant medical entities and relations from the report and external knowledge sources. A three-stage inference process is introduced, decomposing the task into error detection, localization, and correction subtasks, which enhances the explainability and performance of the system. The effectiveness of the approach is evaluated using a benchmark dataset created by corrupting real-world radiology reports with realistic errors, guided by domain experts. Experimental results demonstrate the benefits of the proposed methods, with the combination of internal and external retrieval significantly improving the accuracy of error detection, localization, and correction across various state-of-the-art LLMs. The findings contribute to the development of more robust and reliable error correction systems for clinical documentation.
Read more6/24/2024
0
Automated Radiology Report Generation: A Review of Recent Advances
Phillip Sloan, Philip Clatworthy, Edwin Simpson, Majid Mirmehdi
Increasing demands on medical imaging departments are taking a toll on the radiologist's ability to deliver timely and accurate reports. Recent technological advances in artificial intelligence have demonstrated great potential for automatic radiology report generation (ARRG), sparking an explosion of research. This survey paper conducts a methodological review of contemporary ARRG approaches by way of (i) assessing datasets based on characteristics, such as availability, size, and adoption rate, (ii) examining deep learning training methods, such as contrastive learning and reinforcement learning, (iii) exploring state-of-the-art model architectures, including variations of CNN and transformer models, (iv) outlining techniques integrating clinical knowledge through multimodal inputs and knowledge graphs, and (v) scrutinising current model evaluation techniques, including commonly applied NLP metrics and qualitative clinical reviews. Furthermore, the quantitative results of the reviewed models are analysed, where the top performing models are examined to seek further insights. Finally, potential new directions are highlighted, with the adoption of additional datasets from other radiological modalities and improved evaluation methods predicted as important areas of future development.
Read more5/30/2024