Keystroke Dynamics Against Academic Dishonesty in the Age of LLMs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of keystroke dynamics, a behavioral biometric technique, to detect academic dishonesty in the age of Large Language Models (LLMs).
- The researchers investigate whether keystroke patterns can be used to identify individuals and distinguish between human-written and AI-generated text.
- The goal is to develop an effective method for preventing academic dishonesty, such as the use of AI-powered writing tools, in educational settings.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on using a person's typing patterns, known as keystroke dynamics, to help prevent cheating in academic settings, especially with the rise of powerful AI writing tools like large language models. The idea is that each person has a unique way of typing, with subtle differences in things like how long they hold down keys or the rhythm of their typing. By analyzing these typing patterns, the researchers aim to be able to identify individual students and determine if the text they submit was written by them or generated by an AI system, like the ones discussed in this paper.
This approach could be useful for teachers and schools trying to ensure the work students turn in is genuinely their own, and not just generated by an advanced AI writing assistant. As AI-generated content becomes more prevalent, being able to reliably detect when a student is using such tools could help maintain the integrity of academic assessments.
Technical Explanation
The researchers collected data on the keystroke patterns of participants as they typed a set of passages. They analyzed features like key press duration, keystroke latency, and typing rhythm to build machine learning models that could distinguish between text written by individual participants and text generated by an LLM.
Through their experiments, the researchers found that keystroke dynamics could be an effective way to identify individual writers and detect AI-generated text with a high degree of accuracy. They also discuss the potential challenges and limitations of this approach, such as the need to collect sufficient training data and the possibility of adversarial attacks to bypass the detection system.
Critical Analysis
While the research presented in this paper shows promising results, it is important to consider the potential limitations and ethical implications of using keystroke dynamics for academic integrity purposes. There are concerns about privacy, as collecting and analyzing students' typing patterns could be seen as an invasion of their personal data. Additionally, the effectiveness of this approach may be diminished if students become aware of the detection system and adapt their typing behaviors accordingly.
It is also worth noting that while keystroke dynamics can be a useful tool, it may not be a silver bullet for preventing academic dishonesty. AI-powered writing assistants are becoming increasingly sophisticated, and they may be able to generate text that mimics human typing patterns. Further research is needed to explore the long-term viability of this approach and to address any unintended consequences.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative approach to combating academic dishonesty in the age of LLMs by leveraging keystroke dynamics. The researchers have demonstrated the potential of this technique to identify individual writers and detect AI-generated text with a high degree of accuracy. However, there are important ethical and practical considerations that need to be addressed before such a system could be widely implemented in educational settings.
As AI-powered writing tools continue to evolve, it will be critical for researchers, educators, and policymakers to explore a range of strategies to maintain the integrity of academic assessments and ensure that students are developing their own writing and critical thinking skills. The work presented in this paper represents an important step in that direction.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Keystroke Dynamics Against Academic Dishonesty in the Age of LLMs
Debnath Kundu, Atharva Mehta, Rajesh Kumar, Naman Lal, Avinash Anand, Apoorv Singh, Rajiv Ratn Shah
The transition to online examinations and assignments raises significant concerns about academic integrity. Traditional plagiarism detection systems often struggle to identify instances of intelligent cheating, particularly when students utilize advanced generative AI tools to craft their responses. This study proposes a keystroke dynamics-based method to differentiate between bona fide and assisted writing within academic contexts. To facilitate this, a dataset was developed to capture the keystroke patterns of individuals engaged in writing tasks, both with and without the assistance of generative AI. The detector, trained using a modified TypeNet architecture, achieved accuracies ranging from 74.98% to 85.72% in condition-specific scenarios and from 52.24% to 80.54% in condition-agnostic scenarios. The findings highlight significant differences in keystroke dynamics between genuine and assisted writing. The outcomes of this study enhance our understanding of how users interact with generative AI and have implications for improving the reliability of digital educational platforms.
Read more6/24/2024
0
Navigating the Shadows: Unveiling Effective Disturbances for Modern AI Content Detectors
Ying Zhou, Ben He, Le Sun
With the launch of ChatGPT, large language models (LLMs) have attracted global attention. In the realm of article writing, LLMs have witnessed extensive utilization, giving rise to concerns related to intellectual property protection, personal privacy, and academic integrity. In response, AI-text detection has emerged to distinguish between human and machine-generated content. However, recent research indicates that these detection systems often lack robustness and struggle to effectively differentiate perturbed texts. Currently, there is a lack of systematic evaluations regarding detection performance in real-world applications, and a comprehensive examination of perturbation techniques and detector robustness is also absent. To bridge this gap, our work simulates real-world scenarios in both informal and professional writing, exploring the out-of-the-box performance of current detectors. Additionally, we have constructed 12 black-box text perturbation methods to assess the robustness of current detection models across various perturbation granularities. Furthermore, through adversarial learning experiments, we investigate the impact of perturbation data augmentation on the robustness of AI-text detectors. We have released our code and data at https://github.com/zhouying20/ai-text-detector-evaluation.
Read more6/14/2024
0
Survey on Plagiarism Detection in Large Language Models: The Impact of ChatGPT and Gemini on Academic Integrity
Shushanta Pudasaini, Luis Miralles-Pechu'an, David Lillis, Marisa Llorens Salvador
The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and Gemini has posed new challenges for the academic community. With the help of these models, students can easily complete their assignments and exams, while educators struggle to detect AI-generated content. This has led to a surge in academic misconduct, as students present work generated by LLMs as their own, without putting in the effort required for learning. As AI tools become more advanced and produce increasingly human-like text, detecting such content becomes more challenging. This development has significantly impacted the academic world, where many educators are finding it difficult to adapt their assessment methods to this challenge. This research first demonstrates how LLMs have increased academic dishonesty, and then reviews state-of-the-art solutions for academic plagiarism in detail. A survey of datasets, algorithms, tools, and evasion strategies for plagiarism detection has been conducted, focusing on how LLMs and AI-generated content (AIGC) detection have affected this area. The survey aims to identify the gaps in existing solutions. Lastly, potential long-term solutions are presented to address the issue of academic plagiarism using LLMs based on AI tools and educational approaches in an ever-changing world.
Read more7/19/2024
0
Enhancing Text Authenticity: A Novel Hybrid Approach for AI-Generated Text Detection
Ye Zhang, Qian Leng, Mengran Zhu, Rui Ding, Yue Wu, Jintong Song, Yulu Gong
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has ushered in an era where AI-generated text is increasingly indistinguishable from human-generated content. Detecting AI-generated text has become imperative to combat misinformation, ensure content authenticity, and safeguard against malicious uses of AI. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid approach that combines traditional TF-IDF techniques with advanced machine learning models, including Bayesian classifiers, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Categorical Gradient Boosting (CatBoost), and 12 instances of Deberta-v3-large models. Our approach aims to address the challenges associated with detecting AI-generated text by leveraging the strengths of both traditional feature extraction methods and state-of-the-art deep learning models. Through extensive experiments on a comprehensive dataset, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method in accurately distinguishing between human and AI-generated text. Our approach achieves superior performance compared to existing methods. This research contributes to the advancement of AI-generated text detection techniques and lays the foundation for developing robust solutions to mitigate the challenges posed by AI-generated content.
Read more6/12/2024