On the KL-Divergence-based Robust Satisficing Model
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores a robust satisficing model based on Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence.
- It provides a theoretical framework for understanding the properties and behavior of this model.
- The model aims to find decisions that satisfy a minimum performance threshold while being robust to uncertainty.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a type of decision-making model called "robust satisficing," which tries to find choices that meet a minimum performance level while also being resilient to uncertainty or unpredictable situations.
The key idea is to use a statistical measure called Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence to quantify the difference between the actual outcome of a decision and the desired or target outcome. The model then seeks decisions that minimize this KL divergence, ensuring the outcomes are close enough to the target while also being robust to variations.
This approach contrasts with traditional optimization models that aim to maximize performance, as the robust satisficing model is more concerned with satisfying a baseline requirement rather than achieving the absolute best outcome. The authors provide a theoretical analysis to understand the properties and behavior of this KL-divergence-based robust satisficing model.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a formal framework for a robust satisficing decision-making model based on Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. The key idea is to find decisions that satisfy a minimum performance threshold while also being robust to uncertainty.
Specifically, the model seeks to minimize the KL divergence between the actual outcome distribution and a target or "satisficing" outcome distribution. This ensures the realized outcomes are close enough to the desired target, while also accounting for potential variations or perturbations in the environment.
The authors analyze the theoretical properties of this KL-divergence-based robust satisficing model, examining aspects like the existence and structure of optimal solutions, the role of ambiguity aversion, and connections to other decision-making frameworks like Bregman divergence and distributionally robust optimization.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical treatment of the KL-divergence-based robust satisficing model, exploring its mathematical properties and connections to related decision-making frameworks. However, the analysis is mostly limited to the theoretical realm, and the authors do not present any empirical validation or case studies demonstrating the practical application and performance of this model.
Additionally, while the authors discuss the model's ability to handle uncertainty, they do not explicitly address how the model might perform in the face of model misspecification or distributional shift - situations where the true underlying distribution deviates from the assumed target distribution. Further research could investigate the robustness of the model to such challenges.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a novel decision-making framework based on KL divergence, which aims to find robust satisficing solutions that meet a minimum performance threshold while being resilient to uncertainty. The theoretical analysis provides insights into the properties and behavior of this model, but more empirical validation would be needed to assess its practical applicability and advantages over other robust optimization approaches. Overall, the work contributes to the ongoing research on developing decision-making models that can balance performance and robustness in the face of real-world complexities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
On the KL-Divergence-based Robust Satisficing Model
Haojie Yan, Minglong Zhou, Jiayi Guo
Empirical risk minimization, a cornerstone in machine learning, is often hindered by the Optimizer's Curse stemming from discrepancies between the empirical and true data-generating distributions.To address this challenge, the robust satisficing framework has emerged recently to mitigate ambiguity in the true distribution. Distinguished by its interpretable hyperparameter and enhanced performance guarantees, this approach has attracted increasing attention from academia. However, its applicability in tackling general machine learning problems, notably deep neural networks, remains largely unexplored due to the computational challenges in solving this model efficiently across general loss functions. In this study, we delve into the Kullback Leibler divergence based robust satisficing model under a general loss function, presenting analytical interpretations, diverse performance guarantees, efficient and stable numerical methods, convergence analysis, and an extension tailored for hierarchical data structures. Through extensive numerical experiments across three distinct machine learning tasks, we demonstrate the superior performance of our model compared to state-of-the-art benchmarks.
Read more8/20/2024
0
Statistical Properties of Robust Satisficing
Zhiyi Li, Yunbei Xu, Ruohan Zhan
The Robust Satisficing (RS) model is an emerging approach to robust optimization, offering streamlined procedures and robust generalization across various applications. However, the statistical theory of RS remains unexplored in the literature. This paper fills in the gap by comprehensively analyzing the theoretical properties of the RS model. Notably, the RS structure offers a more straightforward path to deriving statistical guarantees compared to the seminal Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO), resulting in a richer set of results. In particular, we establish two-sided confidence intervals for the optimal loss without the need to solve a minimax optimization problem explicitly. We further provide finite-sample generalization error bounds for the RS optimizer. Importantly, our results extend to scenarios involving distribution shifts, where discrepancies exist between the sampling and target distributions. Our numerical experiments show that the RS model consistently outperforms the baseline empirical risk minimization in small-sample regimes and under distribution shifts. Furthermore, compared to the DRO model, the RS model exhibits lower sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning, highlighting its practicability for robustness considerations.
Read more6/3/2024
🔎
0
A unified law of robustness for Bregman divergence losses
Santanu Das, Jatin Batra, Piyush Srivastava
In contemporary deep learning practice, models are often trained to near zero loss i.e. to nearly interpolate the training data. However, the number of parameters in the model is usually far more than the number of data points $n$, the theoretical minimum needed for interpolation: a phenomenon referred to as overparameterization. In an interesting piece of work that contributes to the considerable research that has been devoted to understand overparameterization, Bubeck and Sellke showed that for a broad class of covariate distributions (specifically those satisfying a natural notion of concentration of measure), overparameterization is necessary for robust interpolation i.e. if the interpolating function is required to be Lipschitz. However, their robustness results were proved only in the setting of regression with square loss. In practice, however many other kinds of losses are used, e.g. cross entropy loss for classification. In this work, we generalize Bubeck and Selke's result to Bregman divergence losses, which form a common generalization of square loss and cross-entropy loss. Our generalization relies on identifying a bias-variance type decomposition that lies at the heart of the proof and Bubeck and Sellke.
Read more9/9/2024
0
Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization
Nicola Bariletto, Nhat Ho
Training machine learning and statistical models often involves optimizing a data-driven risk criterion. The risk is usually computed with respect to the empirical data distribution, but this may result in poor and unstable out-of-sample performance due to distributional uncertainty. In the spirit of distributionally robust optimization, we propose a novel robust criterion by combining insights from Bayesian nonparametric (i.e., Dirichlet process) theory and a recent decision-theoretic model of smooth ambiguity-averse preferences. First, we highlight novel connections with standard regularized empirical risk minimization techniques, among which Ridge and LASSO regressions. Then, we theoretically demonstrate the existence of favorable finite-sample and asymptotic statistical guarantees on the performance of the robust optimization procedure. For practical implementation, we propose and study tractable approximations of the criterion based on well-known Dirichlet process representations. We also show that the smoothness of the criterion naturally leads to standard gradient-based numerical optimization. Finally, we provide insights into the workings of our method by applying it to a variety of tasks based on simulated and real datasets.
Read more5/21/2024