Language-Agnostic Modeling of Wikipedia Articles for Content Quality Assessment across Languages
2404.09764
0
0
Abstract
Wikipedia is the largest web repository of free knowledge. Volunteer editors devote time and effort to creating and expanding articles in more than 300 language editions. As content quality varies from article to article, editors also spend substantial time rating articles with specific criteria. However, keeping these assessments complete and up-to-date is largely impossible given the ever-changing nature of Wikipedia. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel computational framework for modeling the quality of Wikipedia articles. State-of-the-art approaches to model Wikipedia article quality have leveraged machine learning techniques with language-specific features. In contrast, our framework is based on language-agnostic structural features extracted from the articles, a set of universal weights, and a language version-specific normalization criterion. Therefore, we ensure that all language editions of Wikipedia can benefit from our framework, even those that do not have their own quality assessment scheme. Using this framework, we have built datasets with the feature values and quality scores of all revisions of all articles in the existing language versions of Wikipedia. We provide a descriptive analysis of these resources and a benchmark of our framework. In addition, we discuss possible downstream tasks to be addressed with these datasets, which are released for public use.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a language-agnostic approach for modeling Wikipedia articles to assess content quality across different languages
- Focuses on developing a shared representation of articles that can be used for quality assessment, without relying on language-specific features
- Aims to enable cross-lingual content quality evaluation, which can benefit multilingual knowledge resources like Wikipedia
Plain English Explanation
This research paper presents a new way to evaluate the quality of Wikipedia articles, regardless of the language they are written in. The key idea is to create a shared, "language-agnostic" model that can understand the content of articles in different languages and assess their quality.
The researchers recognized that existing approaches to evaluating Wikipedia content often rely on language-specific features, which limits their applicability across languages. By developing a more universal representation of articles, they've created a tool that can assess the quality of content in multiple languages. This is particularly valuable for improving and maintaining large, multilingual knowledge resources like Wikipedia, where content quality can vary significantly across different language versions of the same topic.
The language-agnostic modeling approach means that the quality assessment system can be applied to articles in languages it hasn't been specifically trained on. This flexibility helps ensure that the system can be used to evaluate and improve content in a wide range of languages, supporting the growth and development of diverse, high-quality knowledge bases.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the development of a language-agnostic approach for modeling Wikipedia articles to enable cross-lingual content quality assessment. The researchers leverage large language models and multilingual text representations to create a shared encoding of article content that is not tied to any specific language.
This shared representation is then used to train a quality assessment model, which can evaluate the quality of articles in different languages without relying on linguistic features unique to those languages. The model is trained on a large corpus of Wikipedia articles, using signals like article structure, citations, and community feedback to learn what distinguishes high-quality content.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments on several Wikipedia language editions, showing that the language-agnostic model outperforms alternatives that use language-specific features. They also explore transfer learning, where the model trained on one language can be applied to assess content quality in other languages.
Critical Analysis
The language-agnostic modeling approach presented in this paper is a promising step forward for cross-lingual content quality assessment. By moving away from reliance on language-specific features, the system can be more widely applicable and scalable across multilingual knowledge resources.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations. The researchers note that their current model may still struggle with certain types of language-specific nuances or cultural references that are not fully captured in the shared article representations. There is also a need for further research to understand the biases that may be encoded in the training data and how they impact the quality assessment across diverse languages and cultural contexts.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential for interactive or iterative quality improvement using the proposed system. Integrating the language-agnostic quality model with tools for expert curation and feedback could further strengthen its ability to drive improvements in multilingual knowledge bases.
Conclusion
This research presents an innovative, language-agnostic approach to modeling Wikipedia articles for quality assessment across different languages. By moving beyond language-specific features, the proposed system can be more widely applied to support the growth and maintenance of large, multilingual knowledge resources.
While the current model shows promising results, there are opportunities for further research to address some of the remaining challenges, such as handling cultural nuances and ensuring fairness across diverse languages and contexts. Integrating the language-agnostic quality assessment with interactive curation tools could also enhance its practical impact in real-world knowledge management scenarios.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in enabling more efficient and scalable quality control for multilingual content, with the potential to improve the accuracy and reliability of large-scale knowledge bases like Wikipedia.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
An Open Multilingual System for Scoring Readability of Wikipedia
Mykola Trokhymovych, Indira Sen, Martin Gerlach
0
0
With over 60M articles, Wikipedia has become the largest platform for open and freely accessible knowledge. While it has more than 15B monthly visits, its content is believed to be inaccessible to many readers due to the lack of readability of its text. However, previous investigations of the readability of Wikipedia have been restricted to English only, and there are currently no systems supporting the automatic readability assessment of the 300+ languages in Wikipedia. To bridge this gap, we develop a multilingual model to score the readability of Wikipedia articles. To train and evaluate this model, we create a novel multilingual dataset spanning 14 languages, by matching articles from Wikipedia to simplified Wikipedia and online children encyclopedias. We show that our model performs well in a zero-shot scenario, yielding a ranking accuracy of more than 80% across 14 languages and improving upon previous benchmarks. These results demonstrate the applicability of the model at scale for languages in which there is no ground-truth data available for model fine-tuning. Furthermore, we provide the first overview on the state of readability in Wikipedia beyond English.
6/5/2024
Assisting in Writing Wikipedia-like Articles From Scratch with Large Language Models
Yijia Shao, Yucheng Jiang, Theodore A. Kanell, Peter Xu, Omar Khattab, Monica S. Lam
0
0
We study how to apply large language models to write grounded and organized long-form articles from scratch, with comparable breadth and depth to Wikipedia pages. This underexplored problem poses new challenges at the pre-writing stage, including how to research the topic and prepare an outline prior to writing. We propose STORM, a writing system for the Synthesis of Topic Outlines through Retrieval and Multi-perspective Question Asking. STORM models the pre-writing stage by (1) discovering diverse perspectives in researching the given topic, (2) simulating conversations where writers carrying different perspectives pose questions to a topic expert grounded on trusted Internet sources, (3) curating the collected information to create an outline. For evaluation, we curate FreshWiki, a dataset of recent high-quality Wikipedia articles, and formulate outline assessments to evaluate the pre-writing stage. We further gather feedback from experienced Wikipedia editors. Compared to articles generated by an outline-driven retrieval-augmented baseline, more of STORM's articles are deemed to be organized (by a 25% absolute increase) and broad in coverage (by 10%). The expert feedback also helps identify new challenges for generating grounded long articles, such as source bias transfer and over-association of unrelated facts.
4/9/2024
Text Quality-Based Pruning for Efficient Training of Language Models
Vasu Sharma, Karthik Padthe, Newsha Ardalani, Kushal Tirumala, Russell Howes, Hu Xu, Po-Yao Huang, Shang-Wen Li, Armen Aghajanyan, Gargi Ghosh, Luke Zettlemoyer
0
0
In recent times training Language Models (LMs) have relied on computationally heavy training over massive datasets which makes this training process extremely laborious. In this paper we propose a novel method for numerically evaluating text quality in large unlabelled NLP datasets in a model agnostic manner to assign the text instances a quality score. By proposing the text quality metric, the paper establishes a framework to identify and eliminate low-quality text instances, leading to improved training efficiency for LM models. Experimental results over multiple models and datasets demonstrate the efficacy of this approach, showcasing substantial gains in training effectiveness and highlighting the potential for resource-efficient LM training. For example, we observe an absolute accuracy improvement of 0.9% averaged over 14 downstream evaluation tasks for multiple LM models while using 40% lesser data and training 42% faster when training on the OpenWebText dataset and 0.8% average absolute accuracy improvement while using 20% lesser data and training 21% faster on the Wikipedia dataset.
5/14/2024
Assessing the quality of information extraction
Filip Seitl, Tom'av{s} Kov'av{r}'ik, Soheyla Mirshahi, Jan Kryv{s}tr{u}fek, Rastislav Dujava, Mat'uv{s} Ondreiv{c}ka, Herbert Ullrich, Petr Gronat
0
0
Advances in large language models have notably enhanced the efficiency of information extraction from unstructured and semi-structured data sources. As these technologies become integral to various applications, establishing an objective measure for the quality of information extraction becomes imperative. However, the scarcity of labeled data presents significant challenges to this endeavor. In this paper, we introduce an automatic framework to assess the quality of the information extraction/retrieval and its completeness. The framework focuses on information extraction in the form of entity and its properties. We discuss how to handle the input/output size limitations of the large language models and analyze their performance when extracting the information. In particular, we introduce scores to evaluate the quality of the extraction and provide an extensive discussion on how to interpret them.
5/24/2024