Large Language Models Are Self-Taught Reasoners: Enhancing LLM Applications via Tailored Problem-Solving Demonstrations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides instructions for authors using LaTeX to submit anonymous papers to the AAAI Press.
- It covers guidelines for preparing an anonymous submission, camera-ready guidelines, and copyright information.
Plain English Explanation
The AAAI Press Anonymous Submission Instructions for Authors Using LaTeX document outlines the requirements and procedures for submitting papers to AAAI conferences or journals in an anonymous format. This is important because AAAI uses a double-blind peer review process, meaning the reviewers do not know the identities of the authors, and the authors' names are also concealed from the reviewers.
The instructions cover how to properly format the LaTeX source code to remove any identifying information about the authors. This includes removing names, affiliations, acknowledgments, and other metadata that could reveal the authors' identities. The document also provides guidelines for the camera-ready version of the paper, including formatting requirements and instructions for submitting the final files.
Additionally, the instructions address copyright and licensing for AAAI publications. Authors are required to transfer the copyright of their work to AAAI, which then has the right to publish and distribute the paper. Overall, these guidelines help ensure a fair and impartial review process for AAAI submissions.
Technical Explanation
The AAAI Press Anonymous Submission Instructions for Authors Using LaTeX document outlines the specific requirements and procedures for submitting papers to AAAI conferences or journals in an anonymous format.
The first section, [object Object], provides instructions for removing any identifying information from the LaTeX source code. This includes removing the \author command, as well as any acknowledgments, affiliations, or other metadata that could reveal the authors' identities. The instructions also cover how to properly format section headings, figures, and citations to maintain anonymity.
The second section, [object Object], outlines the requirements for the final, camera-ready version of the paper. This includes specific formatting guidelines for the title, abstract, section headings, and other elements. Authors are also instructed on how to properly submit the final LaTeX source files and PDF to the AAAI publication system.
The final section, [object Object], addresses the copyright and licensing requirements for AAAI publications. Authors are required to transfer the copyright of their work to AAAI, which then has the right to publish and distribute the paper. The instructions provide details on the specific copyright transfer agreement that authors must sign.
Critical Analysis
The AAAI Press Anonymous Submission Instructions provide a clear and comprehensive set of guidelines for authors to ensure their papers are submitted in a properly anonymized format. The instructions cover all the necessary steps to remove identifying information from the LaTeX source code, as well as the formatting requirements for the final camera-ready version.
One potential limitation of the instructions is that they are specific to the LaTeX typesetting system. Authors who use other document preparation tools, such as Microsoft Word or Google Docs, may need to find alternative methods for achieving the same level of anonymity.
Additionally, the instructions do not address the broader implications of the double-blind peer review process, such as the potential biases that can arise or the challenges of maintaining true anonymity in certain research domains. While these are important considerations, they are beyond the scope of this particular document.
Overall, the AAAI Press Anonymous Submission Instructions represent a well-designed and thoroughly documented set of guidelines that should help authors successfully navigate the AAAI submission and review process.
Conclusion
The AAAI Press Anonymous Submission Instructions for Authors Using LaTeX provide a detailed set of guidelines for authors to prepare and submit their papers to AAAI conferences and journals in an anonymous format. These instructions are crucial for maintaining the integrity of AAAI's double-blind peer review process, which helps ensure a fair and impartial evaluation of the research.
By following the guidelines for removing identifying information from the LaTeX source code and adhering to the camera-ready formatting requirements, authors can help protect their anonymity and increase the chances of their work being evaluated solely on its merits. The copyright transfer information also helps clarify the legal and licensing aspects of AAAI publications.
Overall, these instructions serve as an important resource for authors seeking to submit their research to AAAI venues, and they contribute to the broader goal of promoting high-quality, unbiased scientific discourse in the field of artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Large Language Models Are Self-Taught Reasoners: Enhancing LLM Applications via Tailored Problem-Solving Demonstrations
Kai Tzu-iunn Ong, Taeyoon Kwon, Jinyoung Yeo
Guiding large language models with a selected set of human-authored demonstrations is a common practice for improving LLM applications. However, human effort can be costly, especially in specialized domains (e.g., clinical diagnosis), and does not guarantee optimal performance due to the potential discrepancy of target skills between selected demonstrations and real test instances. Motivated by these, this paper explores the automatic creation of customized demonstrations, whose target skills align with the given target instance. We present SELF-TAUGHT, a problem-solving framework, which facilitates demonstrations that are tailored to the target problem and filtered for better quality (i.e., correctness) in a zero-shot manner. In 15 tasks of multiple-choice questions of diverse domains and the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with real-world patients, SELF-TAUGHT achieves superior performance to strong baselines (e.g., Few-shot CoT, Plan-and-Solve, Auto-CoT). We conduct comprehensive analyses on SELF-TAUGHT, including its generalizability to existing prompting methods and different LLMs, the quality of its intermediate generation, and more.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Self-training Large Language Models through Knowledge Detection
Wei Jie Yeo, Teddy Ferdinan, Przemyslaw Kazienko, Ranjan Satapathy, Erik Cambria
Large language models (LLMs) often necessitate extensive labeled datasets and training compute to achieve impressive performance across downstream tasks. This paper explores a self-training paradigm, where the LLM autonomously curates its own labels and selectively trains on unknown data samples identified through a reference-free consistency method. Empirical evaluations demonstrate significant improvements in reducing hallucination in generation across multiple subjects. Furthermore, the selective training framework mitigates catastrophic forgetting in out-of-distribution benchmarks, addressing a critical limitation in training LLMs. Our findings suggest that such an approach can substantially reduce the dependency on large labeled datasets, paving the way for more scalable and cost-effective language model training.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Reasoning with Large Language Models, a Survey
Aske Plaat, Annie Wong, Suzan Verberne, Joost Broekens, Niki van Stein, Thomas Back
Scaling up language models to billions of parameters has opened up possibilities for in-context learning, allowing instruction tuning and few-shot learning on tasks that the model was not specifically trained for. This has achieved breakthrough performance on language tasks such as translation, summarization, and question-answering. Furthermore, in addition to these associative System 1 tasks, recent advances in Chain-of-thought prompt learning have demonstrated strong System 2 reasoning abilities, answering a question in the field of artificial general intelligence whether LLMs can reason. The field started with the question whether LLMs can solve grade school math word problems. This paper reviews the rapidly expanding field of prompt-based reasoning with LLMs. Our taxonomy identifies different ways to generate, evaluate, and control multi-step reasoning. We provide an in-depth coverage of core approaches and open problems, and we propose a research agenda for the near future. Finally, we highlight the relation between reasoning and prompt-based learning, and we discuss the relation between reasoning, sequential decision processes, and reinforcement learning. We find that self-improvement, self-reflection, and some metacognitive abilities of the reasoning processes are possible through the judicious use of prompts. True self-improvement and self-reasoning, to go from reasoning with LLMs to reasoning by LLMs, remains future work.
Read more7/17/2024
0
LLMs Could Autonomously Learn Without External Supervision
Ke Ji, Junying Chen, Anningzhe Gao, Wenya Xie, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang
In the quest for super-human performance, Large Language Models (LLMs) have traditionally been tethered to human-annotated datasets and predefined training objectives-a process that is both labor-intensive and inherently limited. This paper presents a transformative approach: Autonomous Learning for LLMs, a self-sufficient learning paradigm that frees models from the constraints of human supervision. This method endows LLMs with the ability to self-educate through direct interaction with text, akin to a human reading and comprehending literature. Our approach eliminates the reliance on annotated data, fostering an Autonomous Learning environment where the model independently identifies and reinforces its knowledge gaps. Empirical results from our comprehensive experiments, which utilized a diverse array of learning materials and were evaluated against standard public quizzes, reveal that Autonomous Learning outstrips the performance of both Pre-training and Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), as well as retrieval-augmented methods. These findings underscore the potential of Autonomous Learning to not only enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of LLM training but also to pave the way for the development of more advanced, self-reliant AI systems.
Read more6/10/2024