Large Language Models for Code: Security Hardening and Adversarial Testing

Read original: arXiv:2302.05319 - Published 8/19/2024 by Jingxuan He, Martin Vechev
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used to generate code, but they lack awareness of security and frequently produce unsafe code.
  • This work explores two important aspects of LLM security: security hardening and adversarial testing.
  • The researchers formulate a new security task called controlled code generation to address these concerns.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that have been trained on massive amounts of data, including computer code. These models can generate new code, which is useful for tasks like software development. However, the code generated by LLMs may contain security vulnerabilities or other flaws, as the models are not specifically trained to produce secure code.

The researchers in this study aimed to address this issue in two ways:

  1. Security Hardening: Enhancing the LLM's reliability in generating secure code. The goal is to create an LLM that can produce code that is more likely to be secure and free of vulnerabilities.

  2. Adversarial Testing: Evaluating the LLM's security from an adversarial standpoint. The researchers wanted to see how the LLM would perform when faced with attempts to make it generate unsafe or insecure code.

To tackle these problems, the researchers developed a new task called controlled code generation. This task allows the LLM to be guided to generate either secure or unsafe code, while still preserving the model's ability to generate functionally correct code.

The researchers propose a novel approach called SVEN to solve this task. SVEN uses specialized vectors to guide the LLM's code generation towards the desired security properties, without modifying the LLM's underlying weights or architecture.

Technical Explanation

The researchers formulated the controlled code generation task as a way to study the security of LLMs. In this task, the LLM is given a binary input property (secure or unsafe) that guides the generation of code towards the specified property, while still maintaining the LLM's ability to generate functionally correct code.

To solve this task, the researchers developed SVEN, a novel learning-based approach. SVEN uses property-specific continuous vectors to influence the LLM's code generation without modifying the LLM's weights. These vectors are optimized during training using specialized loss terms that target different regions of the generated code.

The researchers evaluated SVEN using a state-of-the-art CodeGen LM with 2.7 billion parameters. They found that SVEN was highly effective at security hardening and adversarial testing. With SVEN, the LLM generated secure code 92.3% of the time, compared to 59.1% without SVEN. Conversely, the LLM generated unsafe code 36.8% of the time under adversarial testing, compared to 0.7% without SVEN. Importantly, SVEN maintained the LLM's functional correctness, ensuring that the generated code remained usable.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their approach has some limitations. For example, the dataset used to train SVEN may not capture the full range of security vulnerabilities that exist in real-world code. Additionally, the study only focuses on binary security properties (secure or unsafe), while real-world security challenges can be more nuanced.

Another potential issue is that the researchers only evaluated SVEN on a single LLM (CodeGen), and it's unclear how well the approach would generalize to other LLMs or code generation tasks. Further research would be needed to understand the broader applicability of SVEN.

Despite these limitations, the researchers have made an important contribution to the field of secure code generation by introducing a novel approach to enhance the security of LLMs. Their work highlights the need for careful consideration of security implications when using LLMs for code generation and other high-stakes applications.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that it is possible to enhance the security of large language models used for code generation, without compromising their ability to produce functionally correct code. The researchers' SVEN approach represents a significant step forward in addressing the security risks associated with the use of LLMs in software development and other domains. As LLMs continue to be adopted for these types of applications, further research and development in this area will be crucial to ensure the safety and reliability of the systems we rely on.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Large Language Models for Code: Security Hardening and Adversarial Testing

Jingxuan He, Martin Vechev

Large language models (large LMs) are increasingly trained on massive codebases and used to generate code. However, LMs lack awareness of security and are found to frequently produce unsafe code. This work studies the security of LMs along two important axes: (i) security hardening, which aims to enhance LMs' reliability in generating secure code, and (ii) adversarial testing, which seeks to evaluate LMs' security at an adversarial standpoint. We address both of these by formulating a new security task called controlled code generation. The task is parametric and takes as input a binary property to guide the LM to generate secure or unsafe code, while preserving the LM's capability of generating functionally correct code. We propose a novel learning-based approach called SVEN to solve this task. SVEN leverages property-specific continuous vectors to guide program generation towards the given property, without modifying the LM's weights. Our training procedure optimizes these continuous vectors by enforcing specialized loss terms on different regions of code, using a high-quality dataset carefully curated by us. Our extensive evaluation shows that SVEN is highly effective in achieving strong security control. For instance, a state-of-the-art CodeGen LM with 2.7B parameters generates secure code for 59.1% of the time. When we employ SVEN to perform security hardening (or adversarial testing) on this LM, the ratio is significantly boosted to 92.3% (or degraded to 36.8%). Importantly, SVEN closely matches the original LMs in functional correctness.

Read more

8/19/2024

Is Your AI-Generated Code Really Safe? Evaluating Large Language Models on Secure Code Generation with CodeSecEval
Total Score

0

Is Your AI-Generated Code Really Safe? Evaluating Large Language Models on Secure Code Generation with CodeSecEval

Jiexin Wang, Xitong Luo, Liuwen Cao, Hongkui He, Hailin Huang, Jiayuan Xie, Adam Jatowt, Yi Cai

Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant advancements to code generation and code repair, benefiting both novice and experienced developers. However, their training using unsanitized data from open-source repositories, like GitHub, raises the risk of inadvertently propagating security vulnerabilities. Despite numerous studies investigating the safety of code LLMs, there remains a gap in comprehensively addressing their security features. In this work, we aim to present a comprehensive study aimed at precisely evaluating and enhancing the security aspects of code LLMs. To support our research, we introduce CodeSecEval, a meticulously curated dataset designed to address 44 critical vulnerability types with 180 distinct samples. CodeSecEval serves as the foundation for the automatic evaluation of code models in two crucial tasks: code generation and code repair, with a strong emphasis on security. Our experimental results reveal that current models frequently overlook security issues during both code generation and repair processes, resulting in the creation of vulnerable code. In response, we propose different strategies that leverage vulnerability-aware information and insecure code explanations to mitigate these security vulnerabilities. Furthermore, our findings highlight that certain vulnerability types particularly challenge model performance, influencing their effectiveness in real-world applications. Based on these findings, we believe our study will have a positive impact on the software engineering community, inspiring the development of improved methods for training and utilizing LLMs, thereby leading to safer and more trustworthy model deployment.

Read more

7/8/2024

Exploring Safety Generalization Challenges of Large Language Models via Code
Total Score

0

Exploring Safety Generalization Challenges of Large Language Models via Code

Qibing Ren, Chang Gao, Jing Shao, Junchi Yan, Xin Tan, Wai Lam, Lizhuang Ma

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has brought about remarkable generative capabilities but also raised concerns about their potential misuse. While strategies like supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback have enhanced their safety, these methods primarily focus on natural languages, which may not generalize to other domains. This paper introduces CodeAttack, a framework that transforms natural language inputs into code inputs, presenting a novel environment for testing the safety generalization of LLMs. Our comprehensive studies on state-of-the-art LLMs including GPT-4, Claude-2, and Llama-2 series reveal a new and universal safety vulnerability of these models against code input: CodeAttack bypasses the safety guardrails of all models more than 80% of the time. We find that a larger distribution gap between CodeAttack and natural language leads to weaker safety generalization, such as encoding natural language input with data structures. Furthermore, we give our hypotheses about the success of CodeAttack: the misaligned bias acquired by LLMs during code training, prioritizing code completion over avoiding the potential safety risk. Finally, we analyze potential mitigation measures. These findings highlight new safety risks in the code domain and the need for more robust safety alignment algorithms to match the code capabilities of LLMs.

Read more

9/17/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Security Code Review by Large Language Models

Jiaxin Yu, Peng Liang, Yujia Fu, Amjed Tahir, Mojtaba Shahin, Chong Wang, Yangxiao Cai

Security code review, as a time-consuming and labour-intensive process, typically requires integration with automated security defect detection tools to ensure code security. Despite the emergence of numerous security analysis tools, those tools face challenges in terms of their poor generalization, high false positive rates, and coarse detection granularity. A recent development with Large Language Models (LLMs) has made them a promising candidate to support security code review. To this end, we conducted the first empirical study to understand the capabilities of LLMs in security code review, delving into the performance, quality problems, and influential factors of LLMs to detect security defects in code reviews. Specifically, we compared the performance of 6 LLMs under five different prompts with the state-of-the-art static analysis tools to detect and analyze security defects. For the best-performing LLM, we conducted a linguistic analysis to explore quality problems in its responses, as well as a regression analysis to investigate the factors influencing its performance. The results are that: (1) existing pre-trained LLMs have limited capability in detecting security defects during code review but significantly outperform the state-of-the-art static analysis tools. (2) GPT-4 performs best among all LLMs when provided with a CWE list for reference. (3) GPT-4 makes few factual errors but frequently generates unnecessary content or responses that are not compliant with the task requirements given in the prompts. (4) GPT-4 is more adept at identifying security defects in code files with fewer tokens, containing functional logic and written by developers with less involvement in the project.

Read more

6/11/2024