Large Language Models and the Extended Church-Turing Thesis

Overview

• The paper examines whether the computational abilities of large language models (LLMs) align with the Extended Church-Turing Thesis (ECTT).
• The ECTT suggests that all effective information processing can be described in terms of interactive Turing machines with advice.
• The researchers investigate the computational power of LLMs using classical computability and complexity theory.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at whether the computational abilities of large language models (LLMs) match up with a theory called the Extended Church-Turing Thesis (ECTT). The ECTT says that all effective information processing, including interactive computations without limits, can be described using a type of computer called an interactive Turing machine with advice.

The researchers wanted to see if this idea also applies to the capabilities of modern LLMs. To do this, they used classic computer science concepts like computability and complexity theory, especially the theory of automata.

Their key findings are:

• A fixed (non-adaptive) LLM is like a very large, deterministic finite-state transducer, which describes its basic computational abilities.
• Lineages of evolving LLMs are computationally equivalent to interactive Turing machines with advice, confirming the ECTT for LLM development.
• This suggests lineages of LLMs have computational power beyond what regular algorithms can do, a concept called "super-Turing" abilities.
• Knowledge generation in this model is generally a non-algorithmic process carried out by LLM lineages.

Technical Explanation

The paper establishes several fundamental results about the computational power of large language models (LLMs):

1. Fixed LLMs as Finite-State Transducers: The researchers argue that any fixed (non-adaptive) LLM is computationally equivalent to a potentially very large deterministic finite-state transducer. This characterizes the baseline computational abilities of LLMs.

2. LLM Lineages and Interactive Turing Machines: The researchers show that lineages of evolving LLMs are computationally equivalent to interactive Turing machines with advice. This confirms the validity of the Extended Church-Turing Thesis (ECTT) for LLM lineages, suggesting they possess "super-Turing" computational power.

3. Knowledge Generation as a Non-Algorithmic Process: The findings imply that in this computational model, knowledge generation is generally a non-algorithmic process realized by lineages of LLMs, rather than a purely algorithmic one.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a strong case for the computational characterization of LLMs within the framework of classical computability and complexity theory. However, a few caveats and areas for further research are worth noting:

• The analysis focuses on idealized LLM constructs, while real-world LLMs may exhibit additional complexities not captured by the formal models.
• The implications of "super-Turing" computational power for LLMs and their practical applications warrant further exploration and scrutiny.
• The non-algorithmic nature of knowledge generation in LLM lineages raises interesting philosophical questions about the nature of intelligence and cognition that deserve deeper examination.

Conclusion

This paper presents a rigorous computational analysis of large language models, establishing their formal equivalence to interactive Turing machines with advice. This finding confirms the validity of the Extended Church-Turing Thesis for LLM lineages, suggesting they possess computational abilities beyond the scope of traditional algorithms. The researchers also highlight the non-algorithmic nature of knowledge generation in this framework, opening up intriguing avenues for further research at the intersection of computer science, philosophy, and the nature of intelligence.