Large Language Models have Intrinsic Self-Correction Ability
2406.15673
0
0
💬
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have attracted significant attention for their remarkable abilities in various natural language processing tasks, but they suffer from hallucinations that will cause performance degradation. One promising solution to improve the LLMs' performance is to ask LLMs to revise their answer after generation, a technique known as self-correction. Among the two types of self-correction, intrinsic self-correction is considered a promising direction because it does not utilize external knowledge. However, recent works doubt the validity of LLM's ability to conduct intrinsic self-correction. In this paper, we present a novel perspective on the intrinsic self-correction capabilities of LLMs through theoretical analyses and empirical experiments. In addition, we identify two critical factors for successful self-correction: zero temperature and fair prompts. Leveraging these factors, we demonstrate that intrinsic self-correction ability is exhibited across multiple existing LLMs. Our findings offer insights into the fundamental theories underlying the self-correction behavior of LLMs and remark on the importance of unbiased prompts and zero temperature settings in harnessing their full potential.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a proof demonstrating the effectiveness of self-correction (SC) capabilities in large language models (LLMs).
- The authors conduct experiments to investigate the intrinsic self-correction capabilities of LLMs and how they can be leveraged to improve model uncertainty and robustness.
- The research explores the theoretical underpinnings of self-correction and provides empirical evidence supporting the idea that LLMs can effectively correct their own mistakes.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the ability of large language models (LLMs) to self-correct, meaning they can identify and fix their own errors. This is an important capability for LLMs, as it allows them to be more reliable and trustworthy.
The researchers provide a mathematical proof showing why self-correction is an effective strategy for LLMs. They also conducted experiments to further investigate this phenomenon and better understand how self-correction works in practice. The paper explores the mechanisms behind self-correction and demonstrates that LLMs can indeed correct their own mistakes, even in biased scenarios.
The findings suggest that self-correction is a fundamental capability of LLMs that can be leveraged to improve their overall performance and reliability. This could have important implications for the development of more robust and trustworthy AI systems that can be relied upon in critical applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a formal proof demonstrating the effectiveness of self-correction (SC) capabilities in large language models (LLMs). The authors leverage the concept of context alignment, which captures the similarity between the model's internal representations and the ground truth, to show that SC can lead to improved model uncertainty and robustness.
The researchers conducted experiments to investigate the intrinsic self-correction capabilities of LLMs. They designed a setup where the model was presented with biased prompts, and the results showed that the LLMs were able to self-correct and provide more accurate outputs, even in the presence of biased information.
The paper also includes an ablation study that explores the impact of different factors on the self-correction process. This provides valuable insights into the mechanics of self-correction and how it can be leveraged to improve model performance and reliability.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the self-correction capabilities of LLMs and provides a strong theoretical and empirical foundation for this important capability. However, the research also acknowledges some potential limitations and areas for further investigation.
For example, the experiments were conducted on a specific set of tasks and prompts, and it would be valuable to explore the generalizability of the self-correction capabilities across a wider range of applications and scenarios. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential biases or limitations of the self-correction process, which could be an area for future research.
It would also be interesting to see how the self-correction capabilities of LLMs compare to other approaches for improving model uncertainty and robustness, such as ensemble methods or more advanced uncertainty quantification techniques.
Conclusion
This paper makes a significant contribution to our understanding of the intrinsic self-correction capabilities of large language models. The formal proof and empirical evidence presented in the study demonstrate that LLMs can effectively identify and correct their own mistakes, even in the presence of biased information.
These findings have important implications for the development of more reliable and trustworthy AI systems that can be deployed in critical applications. By leveraging the self-correction capabilities of LLMs, researchers and practitioners can work towards creating AI systems that are more robust, transparent, and accountable.
Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the fundamental capabilities of large language models and opens up new avenues for further research and innovation in the field of AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
On the Intrinsic Self-Correction Capability of LLMs: Uncertainty and Latent Concept
Guangliang Liu, Haitao Mao, Bochuan Cao, Zhiyu Xue, Kristen Johnson, Jiliang Tang, Rongrong Wang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) can improve their responses when instructed to do so, a capability known as self-correction. When these instructions lack specific details about the issues in the response, this is referred to as leveraging the intrinsic self-correction capability. The empirical success of self-correction can be found in various applications, e.g., text detoxification and social bias mitigation. However, leveraging this self-correction capability may not always be effective, as it has the potential to revise an initially correct response into an incorrect one. In this paper, we endeavor to understand how and why leveraging the self-correction capability is effective. We identify that appropriate instructions can guide LLMs to a convergence state, wherein additional self-correction steps do not yield further performance improvements. We empirically demonstrate that model uncertainty and activated latent concepts jointly characterize the effectiveness of self-correction. Furthermore, we provide a mathematical formulation indicating that the activated latent concept drives the convergence of the model uncertainty and self-correction performance. Our analysis can also be generalized to the self-correction behaviors observed in Vision-Language Models (VLMs). Moreover, we highlight that task-agnostic debiasing can benefit from our principle in terms of selecting effective fine-tuning samples. Such initial success demonstrates the potential extensibility for better instruction tuning and safety alignment.
6/5/2024
Confidence Matters: Revisiting Intrinsic Self-Correction Capabilities of Large Language Models
Loka Li, Zhenhao Chen, Guangyi Chen, Yixuan Zhang, Yusheng Su, Eric Xing, Kun Zhang
0
0
The recent success of Large Language Models (LLMs) has catalyzed an increasing interest in their self-correction capabilities. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the intrinsic self-correction of LLMs, attempting to address the ongoing debate about its feasibility. Our research has identified an important latent factor - the confidence of LLMs - during the self-correction process. Overlooking this factor may cause the models to over-criticize themselves, resulting in unreliable conclusions regarding the efficacy of self-correction. We have experimentally observed that LLMs possess the capability to understand the confidence in their own responses. It motivates us to develop an If-or-Else (IoE) prompting framework, designed to guide LLMs in assessing their own confidence, facilitating intrinsic self-corrections. We conduct extensive experiments and demonstrate that our IoE-based Prompt can achieve a consistent improvement regarding the accuracy of self-corrected responses over the initial answers. Our study not only sheds light on the underlying factors affecting self-correction in LLMs, but also introduces a practical framework that utilizes the IoE prompting principle to efficiently improve self-correction capabilities with confidence. The code is available at https://github.com/MBZUAI-CLeaR/IoE-Prompting.git.
5/14/2024
When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMs
Ryo Kamoi, Yusen Zhang, Nan Zhang, Jiawei Han, Rui Zhang
0
0
Self-correction is an approach to improving responses from large language models (LLMs) by refining the responses using LLMs during inference. Prior work has proposed various self-correction frameworks using different sources of feedback, including self-evaluation and external feedback. However, there is still no consensus on the question of when LLMs can correct their own mistakes, as recent studies also report negative results. In this work, we critically survey broad papers and discuss the conditions required for successful self-correction. We first find that prior studies often do not define their research questions in detail and involve impractical frameworks or unfair evaluations that over-evaluate self-correction. To tackle these issues, we categorize research questions in self-correction research and provide a checklist for designing appropriate experiments. Our critical survey based on the newly categorized research questions shows that (1) no prior work demonstrates successful self-correction with feedback from prompted LLMs in general tasks, (2) self-correction works well in tasks that can use reliable external feedback, and (3) large-scale fine-tuning enables self-correction.
6/4/2024
Small Language Model Can Self-correct
Haixia Han, Jiaqing Liang, Jie Shi, Qianyu He, Yanghua Xiao
0
0
Generative Language Models (LMs) such as ChatGPT have exhibited remarkable performance across various downstream tasks. Nevertheless, one of their most prominent drawbacks is generating inaccurate or false information with a confident tone. Previous studies have devised sophisticated pipelines and prompts to induce large LMs to exhibit the capability for self-correction. However, large LMs are explicitly prompted to verify and modify its answers separately rather than completing all steps spontaneously like humans. Moreover, these complex prompts are extremely challenging for small LMs to follow. In this paper, we introduce the underline{I}ntrinsic underline{S}elf-underline{C}orrection (ISC) in generative language models, aiming to correct the initial output of LMs in a self-triggered manner, even for those small LMs with 6 billion parameters. Specifically, we devise a pipeline for constructing self-correction data and propose Partial Answer Masking (PAM), aiming to endow the model with the capability for intrinsic self-correction through fine-tuning. We conduct experiments using LMs with parameters sizes ranging from 6 billion to 13 billion in two tasks, including commonsense reasoning and factual knowledge reasoning. Our experiments demonstrate that the outputs generated using ISC outperform those generated without self-correction. We believe that the output quality of even small LMs can be further improved by empowering them with the ability to intrinsic self-correct.
5/14/2024