When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMs
2406.01297
0
0
Abstract
Self-correction is an approach to improving responses from large language models (LLMs) by refining the responses using LLMs during inference. Prior work has proposed various self-correction frameworks using different sources of feedback, including self-evaluation and external feedback. However, there is still no consensus on the question of when LLMs can correct their own mistakes, as recent studies also report negative results. In this work, we critically survey broad papers and discuss the conditions required for successful self-correction. We first find that prior studies often do not define their research questions in detail and involve impractical frameworks or unfair evaluations that over-evaluate self-correction. To tackle these issues, we categorize research questions in self-correction research and provide a checklist for designing appropriate experiments. Our critical survey based on the newly categorized research questions shows that (1) no prior work demonstrates successful self-correction with feedback from prompted LLMs in general tasks, (2) self-correction works well in tasks that can use reliable external feedback, and (3) large-scale fine-tuning enables self-correction.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper critically examines the self-correction capabilities of large language models (LLMs), analyzing when and how they can correct their own mistakes.
- It reviews recent research on LLM self-correction, including the factors that influence their ability to self-correct, such as context alignment, confidence levels, and the use of external verifiers.
- The paper provides insights into the current limitations of LLM self-correction and highlights areas for further research and development to improve this capability.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, these models can sometimes make mistakes or produce biased or incorrect outputs. The ability for LLMs to recognize and correct their own errors, known as "self-correction," is an important capability that can enhance their reliability and trustworthiness.
This research paper takes a critical look at the self-correction capabilities of LLMs. It examines recent studies that have explored when and how LLMs can correct their own mistakes. For example, link to "Theoretical Understanding of Self-Correction Through Context Alignment" shows that LLMs can self-correct when the context provided helps them align their output with the intended meaning.
The paper also discusses factors that can influence an LLM's ability to self-correct, such as its confidence level in its own output. Link to "Confidence Matters: Revisiting Intrinsic Self-Correction Capabilities" suggests that LLMs with higher confidence in their outputs are more likely to self-correct.
Additionally, the research highlights the potential need for external "verifiers" to help LLMs identify and correct their mistakes, as described in link to "Small Language Models Need Strong Verifiers to Self-Correct". These verifiers could be additional AI systems or human experts that can provide feedback and guidance to the LLM.
The paper also acknowledges the limitations of current LLM self-correction capabilities and the challenges that still need to be addressed. For instance, link to "Self-Incorrect LLMs Struggle to Refine Self-Generated Outputs" suggests that LLMs may struggle to correct their own mistakes in self-generated outputs.
Overall, this research paper provides a comprehensive and critical analysis of the state of LLM self-correction, highlighting both the progress made and the areas that require further investigation and development to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of these powerful AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by acknowledging the remarkable capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in generating human-like text across a wide range of domains. However, it also highlights the concern that these models can sometimes produce biased, incorrect, or even harmful outputs. The ability for LLMs to recognize and correct their own errors, known as "self-correction," is identified as a crucial capability that can enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of these models.
The paper then reviews recent research on LLM self-correction, examining the factors that influence their ability to self-correct. One key factor is the alignment between the context provided to the LLM and the intended meaning, as shown in the study link to "Theoretical Understanding of Self-Correction Through Context Alignment". This research demonstrates that LLMs can self-correct when the context helps them align their output with the desired meaning.
Another important factor is the LLM's confidence in its own output, as explored in the work link to "Confidence Matters: Revisiting Intrinsic Self-Correction Capabilities". This study suggests that LLMs with higher confidence in their outputs are more likely to self-correct.
The paper also discusses the potential need for external "verifiers" to help LLMs identify and correct their mistakes, as described in link to "Small Language Models Need Strong Verifiers to Self-Correct". These verifiers could be additional AI systems or human experts that provide feedback and guidance to the LLM.
Furthermore, the paper acknowledges the limitations of current LLM self-correction capabilities and the challenges that still need to be addressed. For instance, the study link to "Self-Incorrect LLMs Struggle to Refine Self-Generated Outputs" suggests that LLMs may struggle to correct their own mistakes in self-generated outputs.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive and critical analysis of the self-correction capabilities of LLMs, highlighting both the progress made and the areas that require further research and development. The review of recent studies provides valuable insights into the factors that influence LLM self-correction, such as context alignment, confidence levels, and the use of external verifiers.
One potential limitation of the research discussed in the paper is the reliance on specific experimental setups and datasets, which may not fully capture the complexity and diversity of real-world scenarios where LLMs are deployed. Additionally, the paper acknowledges the challenge of LLMs correcting their own self-generated outputs, which raises questions about the generalizability of the self-correction capabilities observed in the reviewed studies.
Further research could explore the impact of different architectures, training approaches, and fine-tuning techniques on LLM self-correction abilities. Additionally, investigating the interplay between self-correction and other desirable properties, such as robustness, fairness, and transparency, could provide valuable insights for developing more trustworthy and reliable LLMs.
Conclusion
This paper provides a critical and insightful survey of the self-correction capabilities of large language models (LLMs). It reviews recent research that has explored the factors influencing LLM self-correction, such as context alignment, confidence levels, and the use of external verifiers. The paper also acknowledges the limitations of current self-correction capabilities and highlights areas for further research and development.
The findings presented in this paper have important implications for the continued advancement and deployment of LLMs in real-world applications. Improving the self-correction capabilities of these powerful AI systems can enhance their reliability, trustworthiness, and safe deployment, ultimately benefiting both the research community and society at large.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
New!Large Language Models have Intrinsic Self-Correction Ability
Dancheng Liu, Amir Nassereldine, Ziming Yang, Chenhui Xu, Yuting Hu, Jiajie Li, Utkarsh Kumar, Changjae Lee, Jinjun Xiong
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have attracted significant attention for their remarkable abilities in various natural language processing tasks, but they suffer from hallucinations that will cause performance degradation. One promising solution to improve the LLMs' performance is to ask LLMs to revise their answer after generation, a technique known as self-correction. Among the two types of self-correction, intrinsic self-correction is considered a promising direction because it does not utilize external knowledge. However, recent works doubt the validity of LLM's ability to conduct intrinsic self-correction. In this paper, we present a novel perspective on the intrinsic self-correction capabilities of LLMs through theoretical analyses and empirical experiments. In addition, we identify two critical factors for successful self-correction: zero temperature and fair prompts. Leveraging these factors, we demonstrate that intrinsic self-correction ability is exhibited across multiple existing LLMs. Our findings offer insights into the fundamental theories underlying the self-correction behavior of LLMs and remark on the importance of unbiased prompts and zero temperature settings in harnessing their full potential.
6/26/2024
A Theoretical Understanding of Self-Correction through In-context Alignment
Yifei Wang, Yuyang Wu, Zeming Wei, Stefanie Jegelka, Yisen Wang
0
0
Going beyond mimicking limited human experiences, recent studies show initial evidence that, like humans, large language models (LLMs) are capable of improving their abilities purely by self-correction, i.e., correcting previous responses through self-examination, in certain circumstances. Nevertheless, little is known about how such capabilities arise. In this work, based on a simplified setup akin to an alignment task, we theoretically analyze self-correction from an in-context learning perspective, showing that when LLMs give relatively accurate self-examinations as rewards, they are capable of refining responses in an in-context way. Notably, going beyond previous theories on over-simplified linear transformers, our theoretical construction underpins the roles of several key designs of realistic transformers for self-correction: softmax attention, multi-head attention, and the MLP block. We validate these findings extensively on synthetic datasets. Inspired by these findings, we also illustrate novel applications of self-correction, such as defending against LLM jailbreaks, where a simple self-correction step does make a large difference. We believe that these findings will inspire further research on understanding, exploiting, and enhancing self-correction for building better foundation models.
5/30/2024
On the Intrinsic Self-Correction Capability of LLMs: Uncertainty and Latent Concept
Guangliang Liu, Haitao Mao, Bochuan Cao, Zhiyu Xue, Kristen Johnson, Jiliang Tang, Rongrong Wang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) can improve their responses when instructed to do so, a capability known as self-correction. When these instructions lack specific details about the issues in the response, this is referred to as leveraging the intrinsic self-correction capability. The empirical success of self-correction can be found in various applications, e.g., text detoxification and social bias mitigation. However, leveraging this self-correction capability may not always be effective, as it has the potential to revise an initially correct response into an incorrect one. In this paper, we endeavor to understand how and why leveraging the self-correction capability is effective. We identify that appropriate instructions can guide LLMs to a convergence state, wherein additional self-correction steps do not yield further performance improvements. We empirically demonstrate that model uncertainty and activated latent concepts jointly characterize the effectiveness of self-correction. Furthermore, we provide a mathematical formulation indicating that the activated latent concept drives the convergence of the model uncertainty and self-correction performance. Our analysis can also be generalized to the self-correction behaviors observed in Vision-Language Models (VLMs). Moreover, we highlight that task-agnostic debiasing can benefit from our principle in terms of selecting effective fine-tuning samples. Such initial success demonstrates the potential extensibility for better instruction tuning and safety alignment.
6/5/2024
💬
Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Minimal Effort
Zhenyu Wu, Qingkai Zeng, Zhihan Zhang, Zhaoxuan Tan, Chao Shen, Meng Jiang
0
0
Intrinsic self-correct was a method that instructed large language models (LLMs) to verify and correct their responses without external feedback. Unfortunately, the study concluded that the LLMs could not self-correct reasoning yet. We find that a simple yet effective verification method can unleash inherent capabilities of the LLMs. That is to mask a key condition in the question, add the current response to construct a verification question, and predict the condition to verify the response. The condition can be an entity in an open-domain question or a numeric value in a math question, which requires minimal effort (via prompting) to identify. We propose an iterative verify-then-correct framework to progressively identify and correct (probably) false responses, named ProCo. We conduct experiments on three reasoning tasks. On average, ProCo, with GPT-3.5-Turbo as the backend LLM, yields $+6.8$ exact match on four open-domain question answering datasets, $+14.1$ accuracy on three arithmetic reasoning datasets, and $+9.6$ accuracy on a commonsense reasoning dataset, compared to Self-Correct.
6/26/2024