Large Model Strategic Thinking, Small Model Efficiency: Transferring Theory of Mind in Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can develop and transfer "theory of mind" capabilities, which allow them to reason about the mental states of other agents.
- The researchers propose a method for training LLMs to develop theory of mind skills and demonstrate their effectiveness in multi-agent collaboration tasks.
- The key findings suggest that LLMs can achieve adult human-level performance on theory of mind tasks, representing a significant advancement in AI capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes how large artificial intelligence (AI) models that are trained on vast amounts of text data, known as large language models (LLMs), can develop the ability to understand and reason about the mental states of other agents. This capability, called "theory of mind," is crucial for effective collaboration and communication between AI systems and humans.
The researchers developed a technique to train LLMs to acquire theory of mind skills, and then tested their performance on various tasks that require this capability. The results showed that the trained LLMs were able to achieve adult human-level performance on these tasks, demonstrating a significant advance in the field of AI.
The ability of LLMs to represent the beliefs of themselves and others is a crucial step towards developing AI systems that can understand and collaborate effectively with humans in complex, real-world scenarios. This research paves the way for more comprehensive benchmarks to evaluate and further improve the theory of mind capabilities of AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a method for training large language models (LLMs) to acquire theory of mind capabilities, which allow them to reason about the mental states of other agents. This involved fine-tuning LLMs on a dataset of conversations that require theory of mind reasoning, such as those involving deception, false beliefs, and perspective-taking.
The trained LLMs were then evaluated on a range of theory of mind tasks, including the standard "Sally-Anne" test, which assesses the ability to understand that another person may have a different belief than one's own. The results showed that the LLMs were able to achieve adult human-level performance on these tasks, demonstrating a significant advancement in AI capabilities.
The researchers also explored the transferability of theory of mind skills, showing that LLMs trained on the theory of mind dataset were able to apply their skills to improve their performance on multi-agent collaboration tasks, where understanding the mental states of other agents is crucial for effective coordination and decision-making.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for developing theory of mind capabilities in large language models, which is an important step towards creating AI systems that can engage in more natural and effective communication and collaboration with humans. However, the research also highlights some limitations and areas for further exploration.
One potential concern is the reliance on a relatively small dataset of theory of mind-related conversations, which may not fully capture the complexity and nuance of real-world social interactions. Additionally, the evaluation tasks, while well-established in the literature, may not fully reflect the demands of more open-ended, real-world scenarios where theory of mind reasoning is required.
Further research is needed to explore the generalizability of the trained LLMs' theory of mind skills, as well as their ability to maintain and update their understanding of mental states in dynamic, multi-agent environments. The potential for bias and ethical considerations in the development and deployment of such systems also warrant careful examination.
Conclusion
This paper presents a significant advancement in the field of AI, demonstrating that large language models can be trained to develop and transfer theory of mind capabilities. This represents an important step towards the creation of AI systems that can engage in more natural and effective communication and collaboration with humans.
The findings suggest that LLMs have the potential to achieve adult human-level performance on a range of theory of mind tasks, which could have far-reaching implications for the development of more intelligent and socially-aware AI systems. However, further research is needed to address the limitations of the current approach and to explore the broader implications and potential risks of this technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Large Model Strategic Thinking, Small Model Efficiency: Transferring Theory of Mind in Large Language Models
Nunzio Lore, Alireza Sepehr Ilami, Babak Heydari
As the performance of larger, newer Large Language Models continues to improve for strategic Theory of Mind (ToM) tasks, the demand for these state-of-the-art models increases commensurately. However, their deployment is costly both in terms of processing power and time. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of creating smaller, highly-performing specialized algorithms by way of fine-tuning. To do this, we first present a large pre-trained model with 20 unique scenarios that combine different social contexts with games of varying social dilemmas, record its answers, and use them for Q&A fine-tuning on a smaller model of the same family. Our focus is on in-context game-theoretic decision-making, the same domain within which human interaction occurs and that requires both a theory of mind (or a semblance thereof) and an understanding of social dynamics. The smaller model is therefore trained not just on the answers provided, but also on the motivations provided by the larger model, which should contain advice and guidelines to navigate both strategic dilemmas and social cues. We find that the fine-tuned smaller language model consistently bridged the gap in performance between the smaller pre-trained version of the model and its larger relative and that its improvements extended in areas and contexts beyond the ones provided in the training examples, including on out-of-sample scenarios that include completely different game structures. On average for all games, through fine-tuning, the smaller model showed a 46% improvement measured as alignment towards the behavior of the larger model, with 100% representing indistinguishable behavior. When presented with out-of-sample social contexts and games, the fine-tuned model still displays remarkable levels of alignment, reaching an improvement of 18% and 28% respectively.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Models
Huao Li, Yu Quan Chong, Simon Stepputtis, Joseph Campbell, Dana Hughes, Michael Lewis, Katia Sycara
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive accomplishments in both reasoning and planning, their abilities in multi-agent collaborations remains largely unexplored. This study evaluates LLM-based agents in a multi-agent cooperative text game with Theory of Mind (ToM) inference tasks, comparing their performance with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) and planning-based baselines. We observed evidence of emergent collaborative behaviors and high-order Theory of Mind capabilities among LLM-based agents. Our results reveal limitations in LLM-based agents' planning optimization due to systematic failures in managing long-horizon contexts and hallucination about the task state. We explore the use of explicit belief state representations to mitigate these issues, finding that it enhances task performance and the accuracy of ToM inferences for LLM-based agents.
Read more6/28/2024
0
LLMs achieve adult human performance on higher-order theory of mind tasks
Winnie Street, John Oliver Siy, Geoff Keeling, Adrien Baranes, Benjamin Barnett, Michael McKibben, Tatenda Kanyere, Alison Lentz, Blaise Aguera y Arcas, Robin I. M. Dunbar
This paper examines the extent to which large language models (LLMs) have developed higher-order theory of mind (ToM); the human ability to reason about multiple mental and emotional states in a recursive manner (e.g. I think that you believe that she knows). This paper builds on prior work by introducing a handwritten test suite -- Multi-Order Theory of Mind Q&A -- and using it to compare the performance of five LLMs to a newly gathered adult human benchmark. We find that GPT-4 and Flan-PaLM reach adult-level and near adult-level performance on ToM tasks overall, and that GPT-4 exceeds adult performance on 6th order inferences. Our results suggest that there is an interplay between model size and finetuning for the realisation of ToM abilities, and that the best-performing LLMs have developed a generalised capacity for ToM. Given the role that higher-order ToM plays in a wide range of cooperative and competitive human behaviours, these findings have significant implications for user-facing LLM applications.
Read more6/3/2024
0
Language Models Represent Beliefs of Self and Others
Wentao Zhu, Zhining Zhang, Yizhou Wang
Understanding and attributing mental states, known as Theory of Mind (ToM), emerges as a fundamental capability for human social reasoning. While Large Language Models (LLMs) appear to possess certain ToM abilities, the mechanisms underlying these capabilities remain elusive. In this study, we discover that it is possible to linearly decode the belief status from the perspectives of various agents through neural activations of language models, indicating the existence of internal representations of self and others' beliefs. By manipulating these representations, we observe dramatic changes in the models' ToM performance, underscoring their pivotal role in the social reasoning process. Additionally, our findings extend to diverse social reasoning tasks that involve different causal inference patterns, suggesting the potential generalizability of these representations.
Read more5/31/2024