Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2310.10701 - Published 6/28/2024 by Huao Li, Yu Quan Chong, Simon Stepputtis, Joseph Campbell, Dana Hughes, Michael Lewis, Katia Sycara
Total Score

0

Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to enable multi-agent collaboration through the lens of Theory of Mind (ToM).
  • The researchers investigate how LLMs can represent and reason about the beliefs, desires, and intentions of other agents to facilitate effective collaboration.
  • The study evaluates LLM performance on various ToM-related tasks and analyzes the opportunities and risks of using LLMs for multi-agent coordination.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. In this paper, the researchers explore how LLMs can be used to enable collaboration between multiple agents, such as robots or virtual assistants, by helping them understand each other's perspectives.

The key idea is that for agents to work together effectively, they need to be able to reason about the beliefs, desires, and intentions of their collaborators. This ability, known as Theory of Mind (ToM), is crucial for coordinating actions, communicating effectively, and anticipating each other's behavior. The researchers investigate whether LLMs can develop ToM-like capabilities and how this could be leveraged to improve multi-agent collaboration.

Through a series of experiments, the researchers evaluate the ToM-related skills of LLMs, such as their ability to understand the beliefs of others, reason about complex social situations, and achieve human-level performance on higher-order ToM tasks. The findings suggest that LLMs can indeed acquire ToM-like capabilities, which could be harnessed to improve the alignment and coordination of multi-agent systems.

However, the researchers also highlight potential risks and challenges, such as the difficulty of ensuring that LLMs' ToM-based reasoning aligns with human values and intentions. They emphasize the importance of carefully designing and evaluating LLM-based multi-agent systems to leverage the benefits while mitigating the risks.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to facilitate multi-agent collaboration through the lens of Theory of Mind (ToM). ToM refers to the ability to attribute mental states, such as beliefs, desires, and intentions, to oneself and others, and to use this understanding to predict and explain behavior.

The researchers investigate whether LLMs can develop ToM-like capabilities and how these capabilities could be leveraged to improve the coordination and alignment of multi-agent systems. They conduct a series of experiments to evaluate LLM performance on various ToM-related tasks, including higher-order ToM tasks that require reasoning about nested mental states.

The results suggest that LLMs can indeed acquire ToM-like skills, such as the ability to represent the beliefs of others, reason about complex social situations, and coordinate actions based on shared understanding. The researchers analyze the opportunities and risks of using LLMs for multi-agent coordination, highlighting the potential benefits in terms of improved alignment and collaboration, as well as the challenges in ensuring that the LLMs' ToM-based reasoning aligns with human values and intentions.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and insightful exploration of the use of LLMs for multi-agent collaboration through the lens of Theory of Mind. The researchers have designed a robust experimental setup to evaluate LLM performance on a range of ToM-related tasks, and their findings offer valuable insights into the current capabilities and limitations of these models.

One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on synthetic or simplified environments for the experiments. While this approach allows for controlled testing, it may not fully capture the complexity and nuance of real-world multi-agent scenarios. [Further research may be needed to assess the performance and generalizability of LLM-based multi-agent systems in more realistic, multimodal settings.

Additionally, the researchers have highlighted the importance of ensuring that the ToM-based reasoning of LLMs aligns with human values and intentions. This is a critical challenge that requires careful design, evaluation, and ongoing monitoring of these systems to mitigate potential risks and unintended consequences.

Conclusion

This paper presents a compelling exploration of the use of large language models (LLMs) to facilitate multi-agent collaboration through the lens of Theory of Mind (ToM). The researchers have demonstrated that LLMs can develop ToM-like capabilities, which could be leveraged to improve the alignment and coordination of multi-agent systems.

The findings offer significant potential for advancements in areas such as robotics, virtual assistants, and other collaborative AI applications. However, the researchers have also highlighted the need for cautious and responsible development of these systems to ensure that the ToM-based reasoning of LLMs aligns with human values and intentions.

As the field of AI continues to evolve, this paper provides valuable insights and a framework for future research on the intersection of large language models, multi-agent collaboration, and the fundamental cognitive capabilities that underpin effective teamwork and coordination.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Models

Huao Li, Yu Quan Chong, Simon Stepputtis, Joseph Campbell, Dana Hughes, Michael Lewis, Katia Sycara

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive accomplishments in both reasoning and planning, their abilities in multi-agent collaborations remains largely unexplored. This study evaluates LLM-based agents in a multi-agent cooperative text game with Theory of Mind (ToM) inference tasks, comparing their performance with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) and planning-based baselines. We observed evidence of emergent collaborative behaviors and high-order Theory of Mind capabilities among LLM-based agents. Our results reveal limitations in LLM-based agents' planning optimization due to systematic failures in managing long-horizon contexts and hallucination about the task state. We explore the use of explicit belief state representations to mitigate these issues, finding that it enhances task performance and the accuracy of ToM inferences for LLM-based agents.

Read more

6/28/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Hypothetical Minds: Scaffolding Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Tasks with Large Language Models

Logan Cross, Violet Xiang, Agam Bhatia, Daniel LK Yamins, Nick Haber

Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) methods struggle with the non-stationarity of multi-agent systems and fail to adaptively learn online when tested with novel agents. Here, we leverage large language models (LLMs) to create an autonomous agent that can handle these challenges. Our agent, Hypothetical Minds, consists of a cognitively-inspired architecture, featuring modular components for perception, memory, and hierarchical planning over two levels of abstraction. We introduce the Theory of Mind module that scaffolds the high-level planning process by generating hypotheses about other agents' strategies in natural language. It then evaluates and iteratively refines these hypotheses by reinforcing hypotheses that make correct predictions about the other agents' behavior. Hypothetical Minds significantly improves performance over previous LLM-agent and RL baselines on a range of competitive, mixed motive, and collaborative domains in the Melting Pot benchmark, including both dyadic and population-based environments. Additionally, comparisons against LLM-agent baselines and ablations reveal the importance of hypothesis evaluation and refinement for succeeding on complex scenarios.

Read more

7/10/2024

Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task
Total Score

0

Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task

Shao Zhang, Xihuai Wang, Wenhao Zhang, Yongshan Chen, Landi Gao, Dakuo Wang, Weinan Zhang, Xinbing Wang, Ying Wen

Theory of Mind (ToM) significantly impacts human collaboration and communication as a crucial capability to understand others. When AI agents with ToM capability collaborate with humans, Mutual Theory of Mind (MToM) arises in such human-AI teams (HATs). The MToM process, which involves interactive communication and ToM-based strategy adjustment, affects the team's performance and collaboration process. To explore the MToM process, we conducted a mixed-design experiment using a large language model-driven AI agent with ToM and communication modules in a real-time shared-workspace task. We find that the agent's ToM capability does not significantly impact team performance but enhances human understanding of the agent and the feeling of being understood. Most participants in our study believe verbal communication increases human burden, and the results show that bidirectional communication leads to lower HAT performance. We discuss the results' implications for designing AI agents that collaborate with humans in real-time shared workspace tasks.

Read more

9/16/2024

LLM-Coordination: Evaluating and Analyzing Multi-agent Coordination Abilities in Large Language Models
Total Score

0

LLM-Coordination: Evaluating and Analyzing Multi-agent Coordination Abilities in Large Language Models

Saaket Agashe, Yue Fan, Anthony Reyna, Xin Eric Wang

The emergent reasoning and Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities demonstrated by Large Language Models (LLMs) make them promising candidates for developing coordination agents. In this study, we introduce a new LLM-Coordination Benchmark aimed at a detailed analysis of LLMs within the context of Pure Coordination Games, where participating agents need to cooperate for the most gain. This benchmark evaluates LLMs through two distinct tasks: (1) emph{Agentic Coordination}, where LLMs act as proactive participants for cooperation in 4 pure coordination games; (2) emph{Coordination Question Answering (QA)}, where LLMs are prompted to answer 198 multiple-choice questions from the 4 games for evaluation of three key reasoning abilities: Environment Comprehension, ToM Reasoning, and Joint Planning. Furthermore, to enable LLMs for multi-agent coordination, we introduce a Cognitive Architecture for Coordination (CAC) framework that can easily integrate different LLMs as plug-and-play modules for pure coordination games. Our findings indicate that LLM agents equipped with GPT-4-turbo achieve comparable performance to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning methods in games that require commonsense actions based on the environment. Besides, zero-shot coordination experiments reveal that, unlike RL methods, LLM agents are robust to new unseen partners. However, results on Coordination QA show a large room for improvement in the Theory of Mind reasoning and joint planning abilities of LLMs. The analysis also sheds light on how the ability of LLMs to understand their environment and their partner's beliefs and intentions plays a part in their ability to plan for coordination. Our code is available at url{https://github.com/eric-ai-lab/llm_coordination}.

Read more

4/4/2024