Large-Scale Security Analysis of Real-World Backend Deployments Speaking IoT-Focused Protocols

Read original: arXiv:2405.09662 - Published 5/17/2024 by Carlotta Tagliaro, Martina Komsic, Andrea Continella, Kevin Borgolte, Martina Lindorfer
Total Score

0

🏅

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Examines the security of backend infrastructure for common Internet of Things (IoT) protocols like MQTT, CoAP, and XMPP
  • Gathers a dataset of over 337,000 IoT backends and analyzes them for three major security threats: information leakage, weak authentication, and denial of service
  • Finds significant security issues, including backends exposing sensitive information, vulnerabilities to denial of service attacks, and widespread use of insecure transport protocols

Plain English Explanation

The paper investigates the security of the backend systems that power the growing number of IoT devices, such as smart home assistants and health trackers. While prior research has focused on the vulnerabilities of individual IoT devices, this work looks at the backbone infrastructure that enables communication between these devices.

The researchers analyzed over 337,000 IoT backends that use three popular protocols: MQTT, CoAP, and XMPP. They looked for three key security issues: information leakage, where the backends expose sensitive data; weak authentication, which could allow unauthorized access; and denial of service vulnerabilities, which could disrupt the functioning of the devices.

The results paint a concerning picture of the IoT security ecosystem. The researchers found that 9.44% of the backends leaked information, 30.38% of CoAP-based backends were vulnerable to denial of service attacks, and a staggering 99.84% of MQTT and XMPP backends used insecure transport protocols. This suggests that the infrastructure supporting IoT devices has significant security flaws that need to be addressed.

Technical Explanation

The paper takes a broad, systematic approach to analyzing the security of IoT backend infrastructure. The researchers gathered a dataset of over 337,000 IoT backends across three widely-used protocols: MQTT, CoAP, and XMPP. They augmented this data with geographical and provider information to enable more comprehensive analysis.

Using non-invasive active measurements, the researchers investigated three major security threats: information leakage, weak authentication, and denial of service vulnerabilities. For information leakage, they checked if the backends exposed sensitive data. For authentication, they looked for the use of insecure transport protocols like HTTP instead of HTTPS. And for denial of service, they tested the backends' resilience to common attack vectors.

The results revealed significant security issues across the IoT ecosystem. The researchers found that 9.44% of the backends leaked information, 30.38% of CoAP-speaking backends were vulnerable to denial of service attacks, and 99.84% of MQTT and XMPP backends used insecure transport protocols, with only 0.16% adopting TLS, of which 70.93% used a vulnerable version.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable, large-scale analysis of security issues in the IoT backend infrastructure, an area that has received less attention than the vulnerabilities of individual IoT devices. By focusing on three widely-used protocols, the researchers were able to gather a comprehensive dataset and uncover systemic problems.

However, the paper does not delve into the potential causes or root sources of these security issues. It would be helpful to understand if the problems stem from poor design, insufficient security practices, or other factors. Additionally, the paper does not provide much context on the potential real-world impact of the identified vulnerabilities, which could help prioritize remediation efforts.

Further research could explore the security practices and maturity of IoT backend providers, as well as investigate potential solutions, such as secure-by-design frameworks or techniques for quarantining malicious IoT devices. Addressing the security of IoT backend infrastructure is crucial, as these systems form the backbone of the rapidly growing IoT ecosystem.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the security of IoT backend infrastructure, focusing on three widely-used protocols: MQTT, CoAP, and XMPP. The researchers found significant security issues, including information leakage, denial of service vulnerabilities, and widespread use of insecure transport protocols. These findings suggest that the underlying infrastructure supporting the IoT ecosystem has not kept pace with the rapid growth of connected devices, leaving users and their data at risk.

Addressing these security problems is crucial as IoT devices become increasingly ubiquitous, from smart home assistants to health monitoring devices. The paper highlights the need for IoT backend providers to prioritize security and adopt best practices to protect the sensitive data and functionality of these connected systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏅

Total Score

0

Large-Scale Security Analysis of Real-World Backend Deployments Speaking IoT-Focused Protocols

Carlotta Tagliaro, Martina Komsic, Andrea Continella, Kevin Borgolte, Martina Lindorfer

Internet-of-Things devices, ranging from smart home assistants to health devices, are pervasive: Forecasts estimate their number to reach 29 billion by 2030. Understanding the security of their machine-to-machine communication is crucial. Prior work focused on identifying devices' vulnerabilities or proposed protocol-specific solutions. Instead, in this paper, we investigate the security of backends speaking Internet-of-Things (IoT) protocols at scale, that is, the backbone of the entire IoT ecosystem. We focus on three real-world protocols used by IoT for our large-scale analysis: MQTT, CoAP, and XMPP. We gather a dataset of over 337,000 backends, augment it with geographical and provider data, and perform non-invasive active measurements to investigate three major security threats: information leakage, weak authentication, and denial of service. Our results provide quantitative evidence of a problematic immaturity in the IoT security ecosystem. Among other issues, we find that 9.44% backends expose information, 30.38% CoAP-speaking backends are vulnerable to denial of service attacks, and 99.84% of MQTT-speaking and XMPP-speaking backends use insecure transport protocols (only 0.16% adopt TLS, of which 70.93% adopt a vulnerable version).

Read more

5/17/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Cyberattack Data Analysis in IoT Environments using Big Data

Neelam Patidar, Sally Zreiqat, Sirisha Mahesh, Jongwook Woo

In the landscape of the Internet of Things (IoT), transforming various industries, our research addresses the growing connectivity and security challenges, including interoperability and standardized protocols. Despite the anticipated exponential growth in IoT connections, network security remains a major concern due to inadequate datasets that fail to fully encompass potential cyberattacks in realistic IoT environments. Using Apache Hadoop and Hive, our in-depth analysis of security vulnerabilities identified intricate patterns and threats, such as attack behavior, network traffic anomalies, TCP flag usage, and targeted attacks, underscoring the critical need for robust data platforms to enhance IoT security.

Read more

6/18/2024

Software-based Security Framework for Edge and Mobile IoT
Total Score

0

Software-based Security Framework for Edge and Mobile IoT

Jos'e Cec'ilio, Alan Oliveira de S'a, Andr'e Souto

With the proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, ensuring secure communications has become imperative. Due to their low cost and embedded nature, many of these devices operate with computational and energy constraints, neglecting the potential security vulnerabilities that they may bring. This work-in-progress is focused on designing secure communication among remote servers and embedded IoT devices to balance security robustness and energy efficiency. The proposed approach uses lightweight cryptography, optimizing device performance and security without overburdening their limited resources. Our architecture stands out for integrating Edge servers and a central Name Server, allowing secure and decentralized authentication and efficient connection transitions between different Edge servers. This architecture enhances the scalability of the IoT network and reduces the load on each server, distributing the responsibility for authentication and key management.

Read more

4/10/2024

Unveiling Behavioral Transparency of Protocols Communicated by IoT Networked Assets (Full Version)
Total Score

0

Unveiling Behavioral Transparency of Protocols Communicated by IoT Networked Assets (Full Version)

Savindu Wannigama (Department of Computer Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka), Arunan Sivanathan (School of EE&T, UNSW Sydney, Australia), Ayyoob Hamza (School of EE&T, UNSW Sydney, Australia), Hassan Habibi Gharakheili (School of EE&T, UNSW Sydney, Australia)

Behavioral transparency for Internet-of-Things (IoT) networked assets involves two distinct yet interconnected tasks: (a) characterizing device types by discerning the patterns exhibited in their network traffic, and (b) assessing vulnerabilities they introduce to the network. While identifying communication protocols, particularly at the application layer, plays a vital role in effective network management, current methods are, at best, ad-hoc. Accurate protocol identification and attribute extraction from packet payloads are crucial for distinguishing devices and discovering vulnerabilities. This paper makes three contributions: (1) We process a public dataset to construct specific packet traces pertinent to six standard protocols (TLS, HTTP, DNS, NTP, DHCP, and SSDP) of ten commercial IoT devices. We manually analyze TLS and HTTP flows, highlighting their characteristics, parameters, and adherence to best practices-we make our data publicly available; (2) We develop a common model to describe protocol signatures that help with the systematic analysis of protocols even when communicated through non-standard port numbers; and, (3) We evaluate the efficacy of our data models for the six protocols, which constitute approximately 97% of our dataset. Our data models, except for SSDP in 0.3% of Amazon Echo's flows, produce no false positives for protocol detection. We draw insights into how various IoT devices behave across those protocols by applying these models to our IoT traces.

Read more

4/12/2024