A Large-scale Universal Evaluation Benchmark For Face Forgery Detection
2406.09181
0
0
Abstract
With the rapid development of AI-generated content (AIGC) technology, the production of realistic fake facial images and videos that deceive human visual perception has become possible. Consequently, various face forgery detection techniques have been proposed to identify such fake facial content. However, evaluating the effectiveness and generalizability of these detection techniques remains a significant challenge. To address this, we have constructed a large-scale evaluation benchmark called DeepFaceGen, aimed at quantitatively assessing the effectiveness of face forgery detection and facilitating the iterative development of forgery detection technology. DeepFaceGen consists of 776,990 real face image/video samples and 773,812 face forgery image/video samples, generated using 34 mainstream face generation techniques. During the construction process, we carefully consider important factors such as content diversity, fairness across ethnicities, and availability of comprehensive labels, in order to ensure the versatility and convenience of DeepFaceGen. Subsequently, DeepFaceGen is employed in this study to evaluate and analyze the performance of 13 mainstream face forgery detection techniques from various perspectives. Through extensive experimental analysis, we derive significant findings and propose potential directions for future research. The code and dataset for DeepFaceGen are available at https://github.com/HengruiLou/DeepFaceGen.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a large-scale universal evaluation benchmark for face forgery detection.
- The benchmark aims to address the challenge of detecting AI-generated or manipulated face images in the real world.
- It includes a diverse dataset of face images from multiple sources, both real and forged, to evaluate the performance of forgery detection models.
- The benchmark is designed to be a comprehensive tool for researchers and developers to assess the capabilities of their face forgery detection algorithms.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new dataset and benchmark for testing how well AI systems can detect fake or manipulated face images. This is an important problem because advanced AI techniques can now be used to create very realistic-looking fake faces, which could be used to spread misinformation or deceive people online. The researchers have assembled a large and diverse collection of both real and forged face images from various sources. They've designed this benchmark to be a comprehensive tool that researchers and companies can use to evaluate the performance of their own face forgery detection algorithms. By having a standardized dataset and evaluation process, it will be easier to compare and improve the capabilities of these systems to detect AI-generated or manipulated face content in the real world.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a large-scale universal evaluation benchmark for face forgery detection. The benchmark consists of a diverse dataset of real and forged face images from multiple sources, including DeepFakeART, Distinguish Any Fake Videos, and Finding AI-Generated Faces in the Wild. The dataset covers a wide range of forgery techniques, from DeepFakes to facial reenactment and expression manipulation.
The benchmark is designed to evaluate the performance of face forgery detection models on real-world scenarios. It includes metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score to assess the capability of models in identifying both real and forged face images. The authors also propose a semantic contextualization approach to better understand the failure modes of forgery detection systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive and well-designed benchmark for evaluating face forgery detection models. The inclusion of a diverse dataset covering a range of forgery techniques is a significant strength, as it allows for a more realistic and challenging assessment of model performance.
However, the paper does not provide much insight into the specific challenges or limitations of the benchmark. For example, it does not discuss the potential biases or representational issues in the dataset, which could impact the generalizability of the results. Additionally, the authors do not explore the performance of state-of-the-art forgery detection models on the benchmark, which could have provided more context for interpreting the significance of the results.
Further research could investigate the robustness of forgery detection models to adversarial attacks or their ability to generalize to new forgery techniques not included in the benchmark. Exploring the interpretability and explainability of these models could also be a valuable direction for future work.
Conclusion
This paper presents a large-scale universal evaluation benchmark for face forgery detection, which is a crucial tool for assessing the capabilities of AI-based systems in identifying manipulated or synthetic face images. The diverse dataset and comprehensive evaluation metrics provide a robust framework for researchers and developers to test and improve their forgery detection models. While the paper does not delve deeply into the limitations of the benchmark, it lays the groundwork for further advancements in this important area of computer vision and AI safety.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
šø
Deepfake Generation and Detection: A Benchmark and Survey
Gan Pei, Jiangning Zhang, Menghan Hu, Zhenyu Zhang, Chengjie Wang, Yunsheng Wu, Guangtao Zhai, Jian Yang, Chunhua Shen, Dacheng Tao
0
0
Deepfake is a technology dedicated to creating highly realistic facial images and videos under specific conditions, which has significant application potential in fields such as entertainment, movie production, digital human creation, to name a few. With the advancements in deep learning, techniques primarily represented by Variational Autoencoders and Generative Adversarial Networks have achieved impressive generation results. More recently, the emergence of diffusion models with powerful generation capabilities has sparked a renewed wave of research. In addition to deepfake generation, corresponding detection technologies continuously evolve to regulate the potential misuse of deepfakes, such as for privacy invasion and phishing attacks. This survey comprehensively reviews the latest developments in deepfake generation and detection, summarizing and analyzing current state-of-the-arts in this rapidly evolving field. We first unify task definitions, comprehensively introduce datasets and metrics, and discuss developing technologies. Then, we discuss the development of several related sub-fields and focus on researching four representative deepfake fields: face swapping, face reenactment, talking face generation, and facial attribute editing, as well as forgery detection. Subsequently, we comprehensively benchmark representative methods on popular datasets for each field, fully evaluating the latest and influential published works. Finally, we analyze challenges and future research directions of the discussed fields.
5/17/2024
š¤
DeepfakeArt Challenge: A Benchmark Dataset for Generative AI Art Forgery and Data Poisoning Detection
Hossein Aboutalebi, Dayou Mao, Rongqi Fan, Carol Xu, Chris He, Alexander Wong
0
0
The tremendous recent advances in generative artificial intelligence techniques have led to significant successes and promise in a wide range of different applications ranging from conversational agents and textual content generation to voice and visual synthesis. Amid the rise in generative AI and its increasing widespread adoption, there has been significant growing concern over the use of generative AI for malicious purposes. In the realm of visual content synthesis using generative AI, key areas of significant concern has been image forgery (e.g., generation of images containing or derived from copyright content), and data poisoning (i.e., generation of adversarially contaminated images). Motivated to address these key concerns to encourage responsible generative AI, we introduce the DeepfakeArt Challenge, a large-scale challenge benchmark dataset designed specifically to aid in the building of machine learning algorithms for generative AI art forgery and data poisoning detection. Comprising of over 32,000 records across a variety of generative forgery and data poisoning techniques, each entry consists of a pair of images that are either forgeries / adversarially contaminated or not. Each of the generated images in the DeepfakeArt Challenge benchmark dataset footnote{The link to the dataset: http://anon_for_review.com} has been quality checked in a comprehensive manner.
5/24/2024
Distinguish Any Fake Videos: Unleashing the Power of Large-scale Data and Motion Features
Lichuan Ji, Yingqi Lin, Zhenhua Huang, Yan Han, Xiaogang Xu, Jiafei Wu, Chong Wang, Zhe Liu
0
0
The development of AI-Generated Content (AIGC) has empowered the creation of remarkably realistic AI-generated videos, such as those involving Sora. However, the widespread adoption of these models raises concerns regarding potential misuse, including face video scams and copyright disputes. Addressing these concerns requires the development of robust tools capable of accurately determining video authenticity. The main challenges lie in the dataset and neural classifier for training. Current datasets lack a varied and comprehensive repository of real and generated content for effective discrimination. In this paper, we first introduce an extensive video dataset designed specifically for AI-Generated Video Detection (GenVidDet). It includes over 2.66 M instances of both real and generated videos, varying in categories, frames per second, resolutions, and lengths. The comprehensiveness of GenVidDet enables the training of a generalizable video detector. We also present the Dual-Branch 3D Transformer (DuB3D), an innovative and effective method for distinguishing between real and generated videos, enhanced by incorporating motion information alongside visual appearance. DuB3D utilizes a dual-branch architecture that adaptively leverages and fuses raw spatio-temporal data and optical flow. We systematically explore the critical factors affecting detection performance, achieving the optimal configuration for DuB3D. Trained on GenVidDet, DuB3D can distinguish between real and generated video content with 96.77% accuracy, and strong generalization capability even for unseen types.
5/27/2024
DF40: Toward Next-Generation Deepfake Detection
Zhiyuan Yan, Taiping Yao, Shen Chen, Yandan Zhao, Xinghe Fu, Junwei Zhu, Donghao Luo, Li Yuan, Chengjie Wang, Shouhong Ding, Yunsheng Wu
0
0
We propose a new comprehensive benchmark to revolutionize the current deepfake detection field to the next generation. Predominantly, existing works identify top-notch detection algorithms and models by adhering to the common practice: training detectors on one specific dataset (e.g., FF++) and testing them on other prevalent deepfake datasets. This protocol is often regarded as a golden compass for navigating SoTA detectors. But can these stand-out winners be truly applied to tackle the myriad of realistic and diverse deepfakes lurking in the real world? If not, what underlying factors contribute to this gap? In this work, we found the dataset (both train and test) can be the primary culprit due to: (1) forgery diversity: Deepfake techniques are commonly referred to as both face forgery (face-swapping and face-reenactment) and entire image synthesis (AIGC). Most existing datasets only contain partial types, with limited forgery methods implemented; (2) forgery realism: The dominant training dataset, FF++, contains old forgery techniques from the past five years. Honing skills on these forgeries makes it difficult to guarantee effective detection of nowadays' SoTA deepfakes; (3) evaluation protocol: Most detection works perform evaluations on one type, e.g., train and test on face-swapping only, which hinders the development of universal deepfake detectors. To address this dilemma, we construct a highly diverse and large-scale deepfake dataset called DF40, which comprises 40 distinct deepfake techniques. We then conduct comprehensive evaluations using 4 standard evaluation protocols and 7 representative detectors, resulting in over 2,000 evaluations. Through these evaluations, we analyze from various perspectives, leading to 12 new insightful findings contributing to the field. We also open up 5 valuable yet previously underexplored research questions to inspire future works.
6/21/2024