DeepfakeArt Challenge: A Benchmark Dataset for Generative AI Art Forgery and Data Poisoning Detection
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Recent advances in generative AI have led to significant successes and promise in various applications, including conversational agents, textual content generation, voice synthesis, and visual synthesis.
- However, there is growing concern over the use of generative AI for malicious purposes, particularly in the realm of visual content synthesis.
- Key areas of concern include image forgery (e.g., generation of images containing or derived from copyright content) and data poisoning (i.e., generation of adversarially contaminated images).
Plain English Explanation
Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has made tremendous progress in recent years, allowing computers to generate all kinds of content, from conversations to images. This technology, known as "generative AI," has proven to be incredibly powerful and useful in many ways. However, it has also raised concerns about potential misuse, particularly when it comes to creating fake or manipulated visual content.
One concern is [object Object], where generative AI is used to generate images that contain or are derived from copyrighted content without permission. Another concern is [object Object], where generative AI is used to create images that are intentionally contaminated in a way that could confuse or trick machine learning algorithms.
To address these concerns and encourage responsible use of generative AI, researchers have introduced the DeepfakeArt Challenge, a large-scale dataset and benchmark designed to help develop algorithms for detecting these types of malicious uses of generative AI in the context of art and visual content.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the DeepfakeArt Challenge, a large-scale dataset and benchmark designed to aid in the development of machine learning algorithms for detecting [object Object] and [object Object].
The dataset consists of over 32,000 records, each containing a pair of images - one that is a forgery or adversarially contaminated, and one that is not. The images are generated using a variety of [object Object] and have been carefully quality-checked.
The goal of the DeepfakeArt Challenge is to provide a standardized benchmark for researchers and developers to test and improve their algorithms for detecting these types of malicious uses of generative AI in the context of visual content creation and manipulation.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have addressed an important and timely issue by creating the DeepfakeArt Challenge. As generative AI becomes more powerful and widespread, the potential for misuse in areas like image forgery and data poisoning is a valid concern that needs to be addressed.
The comprehensive dataset and careful quality control measures undertaken by the researchers are commendable and should provide a valuable resource for the research community. However, it's worth noting that the dataset is limited to a specific set of generative AI techniques and visual content domains, and there may be a need for additional datasets to cover a broader range of scenarios.
Additionally, while the challenge focuses on detection, there may be a need for further research into preventative measures and regulatory frameworks to ensure the responsible development and deployment of generative AI technology.
Conclusion
The DeepfakeArt Challenge represents an important step in addressing the growing concerns around the misuse of generative AI for malicious purposes, particularly in the realm of visual content creation and manipulation. By providing a standardized benchmark for researchers and developers, the challenge aims to spur the development of more effective detection algorithms, which could ultimately help mitigate the risks associated with image forgery and data poisoning.
As generative AI continues to advance, it will be crucial for the research community, policymakers, and the public to work together to ensure that these powerful technologies are used responsibly and for the benefit of society as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
DeepfakeArt Challenge: A Benchmark Dataset for Generative AI Art Forgery and Data Poisoning Detection
Hossein Aboutalebi, Dayou Mao, Rongqi Fan, Carol Xu, Chris He, Alexander Wong
The tremendous recent advances in generative artificial intelligence techniques have led to significant successes and promise in a wide range of different applications ranging from conversational agents and textual content generation to voice and visual synthesis. Amid the rise in generative AI and its increasing widespread adoption, there has been significant growing concern over the use of generative AI for malicious purposes. In the realm of visual content synthesis using generative AI, key areas of significant concern has been image forgery (e.g., generation of images containing or derived from copyright content), and data poisoning (i.e., generation of adversarially contaminated images). Motivated to address these key concerns to encourage responsible generative AI, we introduce the DeepfakeArt Challenge, a large-scale challenge benchmark dataset designed specifically to aid in the building of machine learning algorithms for generative AI art forgery and data poisoning detection. Comprising of over 32,000 records across a variety of generative forgery and data poisoning techniques, each entry consists of a pair of images that are either forgeries / adversarially contaminated or not. Each of the generated images in the DeepfakeArt Challenge benchmark dataset footnote{The link to the dataset: http://anon_for_review.com} has been quality checked in a comprehensive manner.
Read more5/24/2024
0
A Large-scale Universal Evaluation Benchmark For Face Forgery Detection
Yijun Bei, Hengrui Lou, Jinsong Geng, Erteng Liu, Lechao Cheng, Jie Song, Mingli Song, Zunlei Feng
With the rapid development of AI-generated content (AIGC) technology, the production of realistic fake facial images and videos that deceive human visual perception has become possible. Consequently, various face forgery detection techniques have been proposed to identify such fake facial content. However, evaluating the effectiveness and generalizability of these detection techniques remains a significant challenge. To address this, we have constructed a large-scale evaluation benchmark called DeepFaceGen, aimed at quantitatively assessing the effectiveness of face forgery detection and facilitating the iterative development of forgery detection technology. DeepFaceGen consists of 776,990 real face image/video samples and 773,812 face forgery image/video samples, generated using 34 mainstream face generation techniques. During the construction process, we carefully consider important factors such as content diversity, fairness across ethnicities, and availability of comprehensive labels, in order to ensure the versatility and convenience of DeepFaceGen. Subsequently, DeepFaceGen is employed in this study to evaluate and analyze the performance of 13 mainstream face forgery detection techniques from various perspectives. Through extensive experimental analysis, we derive significant findings and propose potential directions for future research. The code and dataset for DeepFaceGen are available at https://github.com/HengruiLou/DeepFaceGen.
Read more6/17/2024
🔗
0
Deepfake Media Forensics: State of the Art and Challenges Ahead
Irene Amerini, Mauro Barni, Sebastiano Battiato, Paolo Bestagini, Giulia Boato, Tania Sari Bonaventura, Vittoria Bruni, Roberto Caldelli, Francesco De Natale, Rocco De Nicola, Luca Guarnera, Sara Mandelli, Gian Luca Marcialis, Marco Micheletto, Andrea Montibeller, Giulia Orru', Alessandro Ortis, Pericle Perazzo, Giovanni Puglisi, Davide Salvi, Stefano Tubaro, Claudia Melis Tonti, Massimo Villari, Domenico Vitulano
AI-generated synthetic media, also called Deepfakes, have significantly influenced so many domains, from entertainment to cybersecurity. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Diffusion Models (DMs) are the main frameworks used to create Deepfakes, producing highly realistic yet fabricated content. While these technologies open up new creative possibilities, they also bring substantial ethical and security risks due to their potential misuse. The rise of such advanced media has led to the development of a cognitive bias known as Impostor Bias, where individuals doubt the authenticity of multimedia due to the awareness of AI's capabilities. As a result, Deepfake detection has become a vital area of research, focusing on identifying subtle inconsistencies and artifacts with machine learning techniques, especially Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Research in forensic Deepfake technology encompasses five main areas: detection, attribution and recognition, passive authentication, detection in realistic scenarios, and active authentication. This paper reviews the primary algorithms that address these challenges, examining their advantages, limitations, and future prospects.
Read more8/14/2024
0
Deep Image Composition Meets Image Forgery
Eren Tahir, Mert Bal
Image forgery is a topic that has been studied for many years. Before the breakthrough of deep learning, forged images were detected using handcrafted features that did not require training. These traditional methods failed to perform satisfactorily even on datasets much worse in quality than real-life image manipulations. Advances in deep learning have impacted image forgery detection as much as they have impacted other areas of computer vision and have improved the state of the art. Deep learning models require large amounts of labeled data for training. In the case of image forgery, labeled data at the pixel level is a very important factor for the models to learn. None of the existing datasets have sufficient size, realism and pixel-level labeling at the same time. This is due to the high cost of producing and labeling quality images. It can take hours for an image editing expert to manipulate just one image. To bridge this gap, we automate data generation using image composition techniques that are very related to image forgery. Unlike other automated data generation frameworks, we use state of the art image composition deep learning models to generate spliced images close to the quality of real-life manipulations. Finally, we test the generated dataset on the SOTA image manipulation detection model and show that its prediction performance is lower compared to existing datasets, i.e. we produce realistic images that are more difficult to detect. Dataset will be available at https://github.com/99eren99/DIS25k .
Read more4/29/2024