Learning About Structural Errors in Models of Complex Dynamical Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how to model and learn about structural errors in complex dynamical systems using data-driven approaches.
- The key idea is to develop methods to calibrate error models that can capture the inherent uncertainties and limitations of mathematical models in representing real-world complex systems.
- The paper discusses the challenges of data availability and representativeness, as well as approaches to leverage different types of data to improve error modeling.
Plain English Explanation
Many real-world systems, like the weather or the economy, are incredibly complex and difficult to model mathematically. Even the most sophisticated mathematical models will have some level of error or inaccuracy when representing these complex dynamics. This paper explores how to better understand and model these structural errors in complex dynamical systems.
The core challenge is that the inherent uncertainties and limitations of mathematical models are not always well-characterized. This paper proposes developing methods to "calibrate error models" - essentially, building additional models that can capture the errors and uncertainties in the primary model of the complex system. By doing this, researchers can get a better handle on where their models are falling short and how to improve them.
A key aspect is dealing with the availability and representativeness of data. Complex systems often have incomplete or noisy data, which makes it difficult to build accurate error models. The paper discusses strategies to leverage different types of data, even if it is imperfect, to still improve the error modeling process. This connects to work on learning dynamical systems from limited data.
Overall, the goal is to develop more robust and reliable models of complex systems by directly accounting for the structural errors and uncertainties inherent in the mathematical descriptions. This could lead to better predictions, decision-making, and ultimately, a deeper understanding of the complex phenomena being studied.
Technical Explanation
The core technical challenge addressed in this paper is learning about the structural errors present in mathematical models of complex dynamical systems. These errors arise because real-world complex systems often have underlying mechanisms and behaviors that are difficult to capture fully in theoretical models.
The authors propose a framework for "calibrating error models" - developing additional statistical models that can characterize the inherent uncertainties and limitations of the primary dynamical model. This involves leveraging available data, which can be incomplete or noisy, to infer the error structure.
Key aspects of the technical approach include:
- Handling different types of data, including partial observations, indirect measurements, and heterogeneous sources, to build robust error models.
- Accounting for the representativeness of the available data and its impact on the accuracy of the error models.
- Developing efficient computational methods to learn the error model parameters from data.
- Incorporating the error models back into the primary dynamical system model to improve overall predictive capabilities.
The paper also discusses connections to related work on learning causal structures and collective behaviors from limited observations. The core insight is that directly modeling the structural errors can lead to more reliable and interpretable models of complex systems.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several key limitations and challenges in their approach:
- The availability and representativeness of data is a critical factor, and the error models may be sensitive to biases or gaps in the observed data.
- Computational complexity can be an issue, especially for high-dimensional systems, and the authors note the need for efficient inference algorithms.
- The paper focuses on a general theoretical framework, and more work is needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach on real-world complex systems.
Additionally, one could raise the following questions:
- How well do the error models generalize to new regimes or scenarios beyond the training data?
- What are the potential pitfalls of overfitting the error models, and how can that be mitigated?
- Are there alternative approaches, beyond the statistical modeling used here, that could also be effective at capturing structural errors?
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents an important step towards more robust and reliable modeling of complex dynamical systems. However, further work is needed to fully validate the practical utility of the proposed methods and address the remaining challenges.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel framework for learning about the structural errors present in mathematical models of complex dynamical systems. By developing methods to calibrate error models that can capture the inherent uncertainties and limitations of the primary model, the authors aim to improve the overall reliability and interpretability of complex system representations.
The key insights are the importance of leveraging diverse data sources, even if they are incomplete or noisy, and the potential benefits of directly modeling the error structure rather than treating it as a black box. This work has broad implications for fields that rely on mathematical models of complex phenomena, such as climate science, ecology, and economics, where improving model fidelity is crucial for better decision-making and scientific understanding.
While challenges remain, this research represents an important step towards more robust and trustworthy modeling of the real world's intricate dynamics.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learning About Structural Errors in Models of Complex Dynamical Systems
Jin-Long Wu, Matthew E. Levine, Tapio Schneider, Andrew Stuart
Complex dynamical systems are notoriously difficult to model because some degrees of freedom (e.g., small scales) may be computationally unresolvable or are incompletely understood, yet they are dynamically important. For example, the small scales of cloud dynamics and droplet formation are crucial for controlling climate, yet are unresolvable in global climate models. Semi-empirical closure models for the effects of unresolved degrees of freedom often exist and encode important domain-specific knowledge. Building on such closure models and correcting them through learning the structural errors can be an effective way of fusing data with domain knowledge. Here we describe a general approach, principles, and algorithms for learning about structural errors. Key to our approach is to include structural error models inside the models of complex systems, for example, in closure models for unresolved scales. The structural errors then map, usually nonlinearly, to observable data. As a result, however, mismatches between model output and data are only indirectly informative about structural errors, due to a lack of labeled pairs of inputs and outputs of structural error models. Additionally, derivatives of the model may not exist or be readily available. We discuss how structural error models can be learned from indirect data with derivative-free Kalman inversion algorithms and variants, how sparsity constraints enforce a do no harm principle, and various ways of modeling structural errors. We also discuss the merits of using non-local and/or stochastic error models. In addition, we demonstrate how data assimilation techniques can assist the learning about structural errors in non-ergodic systems. The concepts and algorithms are illustrated in two numerical examples based on the Lorenz-96 system and a human glucose-insulin model.
Read more5/29/2024
🧠
0
Neural Structure Learning with Stochastic Differential Equations
Benjie Wang, Joel Jennings, Wenbo Gong
Discovering the underlying relationships among variables from temporal observations has been a longstanding challenge in numerous scientific disciplines, including biology, finance, and climate science. The dynamics of such systems are often best described using continuous-time stochastic processes. Unfortunately, most existing structure learning approaches assume that the underlying process evolves in discrete-time and/or observations occur at regular time intervals. These mismatched assumptions can often lead to incorrect learned structures and models. In this work, we introduce a novel structure learning method, SCOTCH, which combines neural stochastic differential equations (SDE) with variational inference to infer a posterior distribution over possible structures. This continuous-time approach can naturally handle both learning from and predicting observations at arbitrary time points. Theoretically, we establish sufficient conditions for an SDE and SCOTCH to be structurally identifiable, and prove its consistency under infinite data limits. Empirically, we demonstrate that our approach leads to improved structure learning performance on both synthetic and real-world datasets compared to relevant baselines under regular and irregular sampling intervals.
Read more5/7/2024
🔗
0
Learning Collective Behaviors from Observation
Jinchao Feng, Ming Zhong
We present a comprehensive examination of learning methodologies employed for the structural identification of dynamical systems. These techniques are designed to elucidate emergent phenomena within intricate systems of interacting agents. Our approach not only ensures theoretical convergence guarantees but also exhibits computational efficiency when handling high-dimensional observational data. The methods adeptly reconstruct both first- and second-order dynamical systems, accommodating observation and stochastic noise, intricate interaction rules, absent interaction features, and real-world observations in agent systems. The foundational aspect of our learning methodologies resides in the formulation of tailored loss functions using the variational inverse problem approach, inherently equipping our methods with dimension reduction capabilities.
Read more4/8/2024
🌀
0
A note on the error analysis of data-driven closure models for large eddy simulations of turbulence
Dibyajyoti Chakraborty, Shivam Barwey, Hong Zhang, Romit Maulik
In this work, we provide a mathematical formulation for error propagation in flow trajectory prediction using data-driven turbulence closure modeling. Under the assumption that the predicted state of a large eddy simulation prediction must be close to that of a subsampled direct numerical simulation, we retrieve an upper bound for the prediction error when utilizing a data-driven closure model. We also demonstrate that this error is significantly affected by the time step size and the Jacobian which play a role in amplifying the initial one-step error made by using the closure. Our analysis also shows that the error propagates exponentially with rollout time and the upper bound of the system Jacobian which is itself influenced by the Jacobian of the closure formulation. These findings could enable the development of new regularization techniques for ML models based on the identified error-bound terms, improving their robustness and reducing error propagation.
Read more5/31/2024