A note on the error analysis of data-driven closure models for large eddy simulations of turbulence
0
🌀
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper discusses the error analysis of data-driven closure models used in large eddy simulations (LES) of turbulent flows.
- Closure models are critical for accurately simulating turbulence, which is a complex and chaotic phenomenon.
- Data-driven approaches have emerged as a promising way to develop these closure models, leveraging machine learning techniques.
- However, the error analysis of such data-driven closure models is an important but complex challenge.
Plain English Explanation
In the field of fluid dynamics, turbulence is a fascinating but challenging phenomenon to understand and simulate. Turbulent flows, like those seen in wind, water, or even the air around a moving car, are incredibly complex and chaotic. To accurately model these turbulent flows, researchers use a technique called large eddy simulation (LES).
LES works by simulating the larger, more energetic eddies in the flow, while using simplified "closure models" to approximate the effect of the smaller, harder-to-resolve eddies. These closure models are critical for accurately capturing the overall dynamics of the turbulent flow.
Recently, there has been growing interest in using data-driven approaches, like machine learning, to develop these closure models. By training models on data from experiments or high-fidelity simulations, researchers hope to capture the complex physics of turbulence more accurately than traditional modeling approaches.
However, analyzing the errors and uncertainties in these data-driven closure models is a crucial but challenging task. That's the focus of this paper - the authors explore techniques for rigorously evaluating the performance and limitations of data-driven closure models in the context of LES.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for analyzing the errors and uncertainties associated with data-driven closure models used in LES of turbulent flows. The authors demonstrate their approach using a specific data-driven closure model developed in prior work.
The key steps in their error analysis include:
- Quantifying the bias and variance of the closure model predictions compared to high-fidelity reference data
- Investigating the scale-dependence of the closure model errors
- Assessing the sensitivity of the LES results to uncertainties in the closure model
Through this analysis, the authors gain insights into the strengths and limitations of their data-driven closure model, as well as strategies for improving its performance and robustness.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of data-driven turbulence modeling by presenting a rigorous framework for error analysis. By carefully quantifying the bias, variance, and scale-dependence of the closure model errors, the authors identify important areas for improvement.
One limitation discussed is the reliance on high-fidelity reference data, which may not always be available in practical scenarios. The authors suggest exploring ways to leverage limited data or synthetic turbulence generation to overcome this challenge.
Additionally, the analysis is focused on a single data-driven closure model, and it would be valuable to see how the framework applies to other modeling approaches. Expanding the scope to consider the relative merits of different data-driven techniques could provide further insights.
Overall, this paper lays important groundwork for the robust development and deployment of data-driven closure models in LES, which could lead to significant advances in our ability to simulate and understand turbulent flows.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive framework for analyzing the errors and uncertainties associated with data-driven closure models used in large eddy simulations of turbulent flows. By quantifying the bias, variance, and scale-dependence of the closure model errors, the authors identify key strengths and limitations of their approach, providing valuable insights for improving data-driven turbulence modeling.
The rigorous error analysis techniques demonstrated in this work are an important step towards the robust and reliable deployment of data-driven methods in computational fluid dynamics. As the field continues to evolve, such frameworks will be crucial for ensuring the accuracy and trustworthiness of turbulence simulations, which have wide-ranging applications in engineering, science, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌀
0
A note on the error analysis of data-driven closure models for large eddy simulations of turbulence
Dibyajyoti Chakraborty, Shivam Barwey, Hong Zhang, Romit Maulik
In this work, we provide a mathematical formulation for error propagation in flow trajectory prediction using data-driven turbulence closure modeling. Under the assumption that the predicted state of a large eddy simulation prediction must be close to that of a subsampled direct numerical simulation, we retrieve an upper bound for the prediction error when utilizing a data-driven closure model. We also demonstrate that this error is significantly affected by the time step size and the Jacobian which play a role in amplifying the initial one-step error made by using the closure. Our analysis also shows that the error propagates exponentially with rollout time and the upper bound of the system Jacobian which is itself influenced by the Jacobian of the closure formulation. These findings could enable the development of new regularization techniques for ML models based on the identified error-bound terms, improving their robustness and reducing error propagation.
Read more5/31/2024
0
A probabilistic, data-driven closure model for RANS simulations with aleatoric, model uncertainty
Atul Agrawal, Phaedon-Stelios Koutsourelakis
We propose a data-driven, closure model for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations that incorporates aleatoric, model uncertainty. The proposed closure consists of two parts. A parametric one, which utilizes previously proposed, neural-network-based tensor basis functions dependent on the rate of strain and rotation tensor invariants. This is complemented by latent, random variables which account for aleatoric model errors. A fully Bayesian formulation is proposed, combined with a sparsity-inducing prior in order to identify regions in the problem domain where the parametric closure is insufficient and where stochastic corrections to the Reynolds stress tensor are needed. Training is performed using sparse, indirect data, such as mean velocities and pressures, in contrast to the majority of alternatives that require direct Reynolds stress data. For inference and learning, a Stochastic Variational Inference scheme is employed, which is based on Monte Carlo estimates of the pertinent objective in conjunction with the reparametrization trick. This necessitates derivatives of the output of the RANS solver, for which we developed an adjoint-based formulation. In this manner, the parametric sensitivities from the differentiable solver can be combined with the built-in, automatic differentiation capability of the neural network library in order to enable an end-to-end differentiable framework. We demonstrate the capability of the proposed model to produce accurate, probabilistic, predictive estimates for all flow quantities, even in regions where model errors are present, on a separated flow in the backward-facing step benchmark problem.
Read more4/16/2024
0
A Priori Uncertainty Quantification of Reacting Turbulence Closure Models using Bayesian Neural Networks
Graham Pash, Malik Hassanaly, Shashank Yellapantula
While many physics-based closure model forms have been posited for the sub-filter scale (SFS) in large eddy simulation (LES), vast amounts of data available from direct numerical simulation (DNS) create opportunities to leverage data-driven modeling techniques. Albeit flexible, data-driven models still depend on the dataset and the functional form of the model chosen. Increased adoption of such models requires reliable uncertainty estimates both in the data-informed and out-of-distribution regimes. In this work, we employ Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) to capture both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties in a reacting flow model. In particular, we model the filtered progress variable scalar dissipation rate which plays a key role in the dynamics of turbulent premixed flames. We demonstrate that BNN models can provide unique insights about the structure of uncertainty of the data-driven closure models. We also propose a method for the incorporation of out-of-distribution information in a BNN. The efficacy of the model is demonstrated by a priori evaluation on a dataset consisting of a variety of flame conditions and fuels.
Read more7/26/2024
0
Data-Driven Stochastic Closure Modeling via Conditional Diffusion Model and Neural Operator
Xinghao Dong, Chuanqi Chen, Jin-Long Wu
Closure models are widely used in simulating complex multiscale dynamical systems such as turbulence and the earth system, for which direct numerical simulation that resolves all scales is often too expensive. For those systems without a clear scale separation, deterministic and local closure models often lack enough generalization capability, which limits their performance in many real-world applications. In this work, we propose a data-driven modeling framework for constructing stochastic and non-local closure models via conditional diffusion model and neural operator. Specifically, the Fourier neural operator is incorporated into a score-based diffusion model, which serves as a data-driven stochastic closure model for complex dynamical systems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs). We also demonstrate how accelerated sampling methods can improve the efficiency of the data-driven stochastic closure model. The results show that the proposed methodology provides a systematic approach via generative machine learning techniques to construct data-driven stochastic closure models for multiscale dynamical systems with continuous spatiotemporal fields.
Read more8/7/2024