Learning-based Models for Vulnerability Detection: An Extensive Study
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents an extensive study on the use of learning-based models for detecting software vulnerabilities.
- The researchers evaluated the performance of various machine learning and deep learning models, including large language models, on multiple vulnerability detection tasks.
- The study provides insights into the strengths and limitations of these models in identifying different types of software vulnerabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how machine learning and deep learning models, including large language models, can be used to detect vulnerabilities in software. Vulnerabilities are weaknesses in software that can be exploited by attackers. The researchers tested different types of models to see how well they can identify different kinds of vulnerabilities.
They found that these models can be useful for detecting vulnerabilities, but they also have some limitations. The models were better at finding some types of vulnerabilities than others. The paper provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of using these models for vulnerability detection, which can help developers and security experts make more informed decisions about how to use them.
Technical Explanation
The paper evaluates the performance of various machine learning and deep learning models, including large language models, on multiple vulnerability detection tasks. The researchers used a range of datasets containing real-world software vulnerabilities to test the models.
The models were trained to classify whether a given code snippet or software component contained a vulnerability or not. The researchers compared the performance of different model architectures, such as convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, and transformer-based models, on tasks like binary classification, multi-class classification, and vulnerability type prediction.
The results show that the models can achieve good performance on certain vulnerability detection tasks, but their effectiveness varies depending on the type of vulnerability and the model architecture. The paper also discusses the potential limitations of these models, such as their inability to handle complex code structures and their sensitivity to code style and formatting.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of learning-based models for vulnerability detection, which is a crucial area of research for improving software security. However, the study also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.
One limitation is that the models were primarily tested on small-scale datasets, which may not fully capture the complexity and diversity of real-world software vulnerabilities. The researchers suggest that expanding the datasets and exploring transfer learning techniques could help address this issue.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the interpretability and explainability of the models' decisions, which is an important consideration for deploying these models in security-critical applications. Further research is needed to understand the internal decision-making processes of the models and ensure their reliability and trustworthiness.
The paper also highlights the need for more work on incorporating domain-specific knowledge, such as programming languages and software engineering principles, into the model design and training process. This could potentially lead to more robust and accurate vulnerability detection capabilities.
Conclusion
This extensive study on the use of learning-based models for vulnerability detection provides valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in the field of software security. The findings suggest that these models can be a useful tool for identifying vulnerabilities, but their effectiveness is influenced by the type of vulnerability and the model architecture.
The paper's critical analysis highlights the need for further research to address the limitations of the current approaches and to explore ways of making these models more reliable, interpretable, and suitable for real-world deployment. As the field of software security continues to evolve, the insights from this study can inform the development of more advanced and effective vulnerability detection solutions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learning-based Models for Vulnerability Detection: An Extensive Study
Chao Ni, Liyu Shen, Xiaodan Xu, Xin Yin, Shaohua Wang
Though many deep learning-based models have made great progress in vulnerability detection, we have no good understanding of these models, which limits the further advancement of model capability, understanding of the mechanism of model detection, and efficiency and safety of practical application of models. In this paper, we extensively and comprehensively investigate two types of state-of-the-art learning-based approaches (sequence-based and graph-based) by conducting experiments on a recently built large-scale dataset. We investigate seven research questions from five dimensions, namely model capabilities, model interpretation, model stability, ease of use of model, and model economy. We experimentally demonstrate the priority of sequence-based models and the limited abilities of both LLM (ChatGPT) and graph-based models. We explore the types of vulnerability that learning-based models skilled in and reveal the instability of the models though the input is subtlely semantical-equivalently changed. We empirically explain what the models have learned. We summarize the pre-processing as well as requirements for easily using the models. Finally, we initially induce the vital information for economically and safely practical usage of these models.
Read more8/15/2024
0
Security Vulnerability Detection with Multitask Self-Instructed Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
Aidan Z. H. Yang, Haoye Tian, He Ye, Ruben Martins, Claire Le Goues
Software security vulnerabilities allow attackers to perform malicious activities to disrupt software operations. Recent Transformer-based language models have significantly advanced vulnerability detection, surpassing the capabilities of static analysis based deep learning models. However, language models trained solely on code tokens do not capture either the explanation of vulnerability type or the data flow structure information of code, both of which are crucial for vulnerability detection. We propose a novel technique that integrates a multitask sequence-to-sequence LLM with pro-gram control flow graphs encoded as a graph neural network to achieve sequence-to-classification vulnerability detection. We introduce MSIVD, multitask self-instructed fine-tuning for vulnerability detection, inspired by chain-of-thought prompting and LLM self-instruction. Our experiments demonstrate that MSIVD achieves superior performance, outperforming the highest LLM-based vulnerability detector baseline (LineVul), with a F1 score of 0.92 on the BigVul dataset, and 0.48 on the PreciseBugs dataset. By training LLMs and GNNs simultaneously using a combination of code and explanatory metrics of a vulnerable program, MSIVD represents a promising direction for advancing LLM-based vulnerability detection that generalizes to unseen data. Based on our findings, we further discuss the necessity for new labelled security vulnerability datasets, as recent LLMs have seen or memorized prior datasets' held-out evaluation data.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Can LLMs be Fooled? Investigating Vulnerabilities in LLMs
Sara Abdali, Jia He, CJ Barberan, Richard Anarfi
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has garnered significant popularity and wielded immense power across various domains within Natural Language Processing (NLP). While their capabilities are undeniably impressive, it is crucial to identify and scrutinize their vulnerabilities especially when those vulnerabilities can have costly consequences. One such LLM, trained to provide a concise summarization from medical documents could unequivocally leak personal patient data when prompted surreptitiously. This is just one of many unfortunate examples that have been unveiled and further research is necessary to comprehend the underlying reasons behind such vulnerabilities. In this study, we delve into multiple sections of vulnerabilities which are model-based, training-time, inference-time vulnerabilities, and discuss mitigation strategies including Model Editing which aims at modifying LLMs behavior, and Chroma Teaming which incorporates synergy of multiple teaming strategies to enhance LLMs' resilience. This paper will synthesize the findings from each vulnerability section and propose new directions of research and development. By understanding the focal points of current vulnerabilities, we can better anticipate and mitigate future risks, paving the road for more robust and secure LLMs.
Read more7/31/2024
0
Learning on Graphs with Large Language Models(LLMs): A Deep Dive into Model Robustness
Kai Guo, Zewen Liu, Zhikai Chen, Hongzhi Wen, Wei Jin, Jiliang Tang, Yi Chang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across various natural language processing tasks. Recently, several LLMs-based pipelines have been developed to enhance learning on graphs with text attributes, showcasing promising performance. However, graphs are well-known to be susceptible to adversarial attacks and it remains unclear whether LLMs exhibit robustness in learning on graphs. To address this gap, our work aims to explore the potential of LLMs in the context of adversarial attacks on graphs. Specifically, we investigate the robustness against graph structural and textual perturbations in terms of two dimensions: LLMs-as-Enhancers and LLMs-as-Predictors. Through extensive experiments, we find that, compared to shallow models, both LLMs-as-Enhancers and LLMs-as-Predictors offer superior robustness against structural and textual attacks.Based on these findings, we carried out additional analyses to investigate the underlying causes. Furthermore, we have made our benchmark library openly available to facilitate quick and fair evaluations, and to encourage ongoing innovative research in this field.
Read more7/30/2024