Learning Mutually Informed Representations for Characters and Subwords

Overview

• Most language models use subword tokenization, which breaks text into smaller units like characters or words.
• Different text granularities (characters, subwords, words) can contain different types of information.
• Prior studies show that using multiple input granularities improves model performance, but few output representations for each granularity.
• This paper introduces the "entanglement model" to combine character and subword language models, generating mutually informed representations for both.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers behind this paper noticed that most language models - AI systems that can understand and generate human language - work by breaking text down into smaller pieces called "subwords." This subword tokenization can help the models handle words they haven't seen before.

However, the researchers also realized that different levels of text - like individual characters, subwords, or full words - can actually contain distinct types of information that could be useful for the models. Previous studies had shown that incorporating multiple input granularities (character, subword, word) can improve a model's overall performance, but these models typically didn't produce useful representations for each granularity as output.

To address this, the researchers developed a new model called the "entanglement model." Inspired by vision-language models that can process both images and text, the entanglement model treats characters and subwords as separate "modalities" and learns to generate mutually informed representations for both.

The researchers evaluated this entanglement model on a variety of language tasks like text classification, named entity recognition, and sequence labeling. Notably, they found that the entanglement model outperformed its underlying language models, especially when dealing with noisy or low-resource languages. It even beat larger pre-trained models on some English language tasks.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this paper is the "entanglement model," which aims to combine character-level and subword-level language models to generate more informative representations for both granularities.

Inspired by vision-language models, the entanglement model treats characters and subwords as separate "modalities" and learns to generate mutually informed representations for them. This is in contrast to typical language models that use subword tokenization but don't explicitly model the interactions between different text granularities.

The entanglement model has two main components: a character-level encoder and a subword-level encoder. The character encoder takes a sequence of characters as input and produces a character-level representation. The subword encoder takes a sequence of subwords and generates a subword-level representation. Crucially, the two encoders are connected, allowing the representations to inform each other.

The researchers evaluated the entanglement model on a range of language tasks, including text classification, named entity recognition, POS-tagging, and character-level sequence labeling. They found that the entanglement model outperformed its underlying character-level and subword-level language models, especially in the presence of noisy or low-resource data. Remarkably, the entanglement model also surpassed larger pre-trained language models on all English sequence labeling and classification tasks.

Critical Analysis

One potential limitation of the entanglement model is that it requires training separate character-level and subword-level encoders, which could be more computationally expensive than a single, unified language model. The paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the model's training time or inference latency compared to other approaches.

Additionally, the researchers only evaluated the entanglement model on a limited set of tasks, primarily focusing on sequence labeling and classification. It would be interesting to see how the model performs on other language understanding and generation tasks, such as translation, summarization, or open-ended dialogue.

The paper also does not provide a thorough analysis of the learned character-level and subword-level representations, nor does it explore the specific types of information captured by each granularity. A more in-depth examination of the internal workings of the entanglement model could yield additional insights.

Overall, the entanglement model presents a promising approach to leveraging multiple text granularities, and the strong performance on the evaluated tasks suggests it could be a valuable tool for a variety of language-related applications. However, further research is needed to fully understand its capabilities and limitations.

Conclusion

This paper introduces the "entanglement model," a novel language model that combines character-level and subword-level representations to improve performance on a range of language tasks. By treating characters and subwords as separate modalities and learning mutually informed representations for both, the entanglement model outperforms its underlying language models, particularly in the presence of noisy or low-resource data.

The strong results on sequence labeling and classification tasks demonstrate the potential of the entanglement model to enhance language understanding and processing. While more research is needed to fully explore its capabilities, this work highlights the benefits of incorporating multiple text granularities and cross-modal interactions in language models, potentially leading to more robust and versatile AI systems for a variety of real-world applications.