Learning in Repeated Multi-Unit Pay-As-Bid Auctions

Overview

• This paper explores the problem of learning how to bid in repeated multi-unit pay-as-bid auctions, which are common in scenarios like Carbon Emissions Trading Schemes, Treasury Auctions, and Procurement Auctions.
• The key challenge is the combinatorial nature of the action space, as bidders must optimize their entire vector of bids.
• The paper proposes an offline optimization approach using dynamic programming and online learning algorithms that achieve sublinear regret bounds.
• The results suggest that when all agents use the proposed no-regret learning algorithms, the market dynamics converge to a welfare-maximizing equilibrium.
• The paper also demonstrates that pay-as-bid auctions consistently generate higher revenue compared to uniform price auctions.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world situations, businesses, governments, and individuals need to bid on multiple identical items, such as carbon emission credits, government bonds, or procurement contracts. These multi-unit auctions can be challenging because bidders must determine the best set of bids to submit, which creates a complex optimization problem.

This paper proposes a way for bidders to learn how to bid effectively in these types of auctions over time. The key idea is to use a dynamic programming approach to determine the optimal bids, given information about past bids by other participants. The authors then design online learning algorithms that can adapt to changing market conditions without requiring full information about other bidders.

The paper shows that these learning algorithms can achieve sublinear regret, meaning that as the number of auctions increases, the difference between the bidder's earnings and the optimal strategy's earnings vanishes. Interestingly, the authors also find that when all bidders use these no-regret learning algorithms, the market tends to converge to a welfare-maximizing equilibrium, where everyone submits uniform bids.

Finally, the paper compares pay-as-bid auctions (where winners pay their bid price) to uniform price auctions (where winners all pay the same clearing price) and finds that pay-as-bid auctions consistently generate higher revenue for the seller. This has important implications for the design of real-world auction markets.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on the problem of learning how to bid in repeated multi-unit pay-as-bid auctions, where a large number of identical items are allocated to the highest bidders, and each winning bidder pays their bid price. This setting is motivated by applications such as Carbon Emissions Trading Schemes, Treasury Auctions, and Procurement Auctions.

The key challenge is the combinatorial nature of the action space, as bidders must optimize their entire vector of bids. To overcome this, the paper focuses on the offline setting, where the bidder optimizes their bids while only having access to the past submitted bids by other bidders.

The authors show that the optimal solution to the offline problem can be obtained using a polynomial-time dynamic programming (DP) scheme. They then leverage the structure of the DP scheme to design online learning algorithms with polynomial-time and space complexity under both full information and bandit feedback settings.

The paper achieves sublinear regret bounds of $O(Msqrt{Tlog |mathcal{B}|})$ and $O(Msqrt{|mathcal{B}|Tlog |mathcal{B}|})$, where $M$ is the number of units demanded by the bidder, $T$ is the total number of auctions, and $|mathcal{B}|$ is the size of the discretized bid space. The authors also provide a regret lower bound that matches the linear dependency in $M$.

The numerical results suggest that when all agents behave according to the proposed no-regret learning algorithms, the resulting market dynamics mainly converge to a welfare-maximizing equilibrium where bidders submit uniform bids. Additionally, the paper demonstrates that pay-as-bid auctions consistently generate significantly higher revenue compared to their popular alternative, the uniform price auction.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for learning to bid effectively in multi-unit pay-as-bid auctions, which are widely used in practice. The authors' focus on the offline optimization problem and the subsequent design of online learning algorithms with sublinear regret bounds is a solid contribution.

However, the paper does not address several important practical considerations. For example, it assumes that all bidders have access to the same information about past bids, which may not always be the case in real-world scenarios. Additionally, the paper does not consider the potential for strategic manipulation or collusion among bidders, which could significantly impact the market dynamics.

Furthermore, the paper's conclusion that the pay-as-bid auction mechanism consistently outperforms the uniform price auction in terms of revenue generation may not hold in all settings. The relative performance of these auction formats can depend on factors such as the number of bidders, their risk preferences, and the distribution of their valuations.

Future research could explore the robustness of the proposed algorithms to various market conditions and bidder behaviors, as well as investigate the potential for incorporating additional constraints or objectives into the bidding optimization problem.

Conclusion

This paper presents an innovative approach for learning how to bid effectively in multi-unit pay-as-bid auctions, which are widely used in real-world scenarios such as carbon emissions trading, government bond auctions, and procurement auctions. The proposed offline optimization and online learning algorithms achieve strong theoretical guarantees, and the authors' finding that pay-as-bid auctions consistently generate higher revenue than uniform price auctions has important implications for auction design.

While the paper provides a solid foundation, further research is needed to address practical considerations and explore the robustness of the proposed approach to various market conditions and bidder behaviors. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in developing strategic, robust bidding algorithms for multi-unit auctions, which are a critical component of many economic and financial systems.