Artificial Intelligence for Multi-Unit Auction design
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to design more realistic and effective multi-unit auctions.
- The study is supported by the Translation Investment Fund (TIF23015) at RMIT University, and the authors acknowledge valuable feedback from seminar participants.
- The paper aims to advance the state of the art in auction design, with potential applications in areas like online advertising auctions and federated learning.
Plain English Explanation
Multi-unit auctions are a type of auction where multiple units of a product or service are sold at the same time. These auctions are commonly used in various industries, such as online advertising and cryptocurrency markets.
The researchers in this paper aim to improve the design of these multi-unit auctions by incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Their goal is to create auction mechanisms that are more realistic and effective, potentially leading to better outcomes for both buyers and sellers.
The key idea is to use AI models to better understand the complex dynamics and behaviors of auction participants, and then use this knowledge to design auction rules and mechanisms that are more aligned with the real-world needs and preferences of the participants.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a theoretical framework for incorporating AI into the design of multi-unit auctions. The researchers develop a model that captures the strategic interactions between buyers and sellers in these auctions, taking into account factors such as bidder preferences, budget constraints, and the potential for collusion or manipulation.
Using this model, the researchers then explore how AI-powered algorithms can be used to optimize the auction design, such as by determining optimal reserve prices, bid allocation rules, and payment schemes. The paper also discusses how these AI-powered auction mechanisms can be implemented in practice, including the use of deep learning and [reinforcement learning] techniques.
Through a series of simulations and case studies, the authors demonstrate the potential benefits of their AI-powered auction design approach, including increased revenue, improved allocative efficiency, and better alignment with the preferences of auction participants.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling and well-reasoned approach to leveraging AI for the design of more realistic and effective multi-unit auctions. The researchers have developed a robust theoretical framework and have provided concrete examples of how their techniques can be applied in practice.
One potential limitation of the research is that it is primarily focused on the design of the auction mechanism itself, without fully addressing the potential impacts on broader social and economic factors. For example, the paper does not delve deeply into the distributional effects of these AI-powered auctions, or the potential for unintended consequences, such as increased market concentration or the exploitation of vulnerable participants.
Additionally, the paper acknowledges that the implementation of these AI-powered auction mechanisms may face practical challenges, such as the need for extensive data, computational resources, and regulatory oversight. Further research may be needed to address these practical considerations and ensure the responsible and ethical deployment of these technologies.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a promising approach to leveraging artificial intelligence for the design of more realistic and effective multi-unit auctions. By incorporating AI techniques into the auction design process, the researchers aim to create mechanisms that better align with the real-world needs and preferences of auction participants, potentially leading to improved outcomes for buyers, sellers, and the broader market.
While the paper acknowledges some potential limitations and challenges, the overall approach is well-conceived and could have significant implications for industries that rely on multi-unit auctions, such as online advertising and federated learning. As the field of AI and auction design continues to evolve, this research represents an important step forward in creating more sophisticated and impactful auction mechanisms.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Artificial Intelligence for Multi-Unit Auction design
Peyman Khezr, Kendall Taylor
Understanding bidding behavior in multi-unit auctions remains an ongoing challenge for researchers. Despite their widespread use, theoretical insights into the bidding behavior, revenue ranking, and efficiency of commonly used multi-unit auctions are limited. This paper utilizes artificial intelligence, specifically reinforcement learning, as a model free learning approach to simulate bidding in three prominent multi-unit auctions employed in practice. We introduce six algorithms that are suitable for learning and bidding in multi-unit auctions and compare them using an illustrative example. This paper underscores the significance of using artificial intelligence in auction design, particularly in enhancing the design of multi-unit auctions.
Read more4/30/2024
🤖
0
Learning in Repeated Multi-Unit Pay-As-Bid Auctions
Rigel Galgana, Negin Golrezaei
Motivated by Carbon Emissions Trading Schemes, Treasury Auctions, and Procurement Auctions, which all involve the auctioning of homogeneous multiple units, we consider the problem of learning how to bid in repeated multi-unit pay-as-bid auctions. In each of these auctions, a large number of (identical) items are to be allocated to the largest submitted bids, where the price of each of the winning bids is equal to the bid itself. The problem of learning how to bid in pay-as-bid auctions is challenging due to the combinatorial nature of the action space. We overcome this challenge by focusing on the offline setting, where the bidder optimizes their vector of bids while only having access to the past submitted bids by other bidders. We show that the optimal solution to the offline problem can be obtained using a polynomial time dynamic programming (DP) scheme. We leverage the structure of the DP scheme to design online learning algorithms with polynomial time and space complexity under full information and bandit feedback settings. We achieve an upper bound on regret of $O(Msqrt{Tlog |mathcal{B}|})$ and $O(Msqrt{|mathcal{B}|Tlog |mathcal{B}|})$ respectively, where $M$ is the number of units demanded by the bidder, $T$ is the total number of auctions, and $|mathcal{B}|$ is the size of the discretized bid space. We accompany these results with a regret lower bound, which match the linear dependency in $M$. Our numerical results suggest that when all agents behave according to our proposed no regret learning algorithms, the resulting market dynamics mainly converge to a welfare maximizing equilibrium where bidders submit uniform bids. Lastly, our experiments demonstrate that the pay-as-bid auction consistently generates significantly higher revenue compared to its popular alternative, the uniform price auction.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Understanding Iterative Combinatorial Auction Designs via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Greg d'Eon, Neil Newman, Kevin Leyton-Brown
Iterative combinatorial auctions are widely used in high stakes settings such as spectrum auctions. Such auctions can be hard to analyze, making it difficult for bidders to determine how to behave and for designers to optimize auction rules to ensure desirable outcomes such as high revenue or welfare. In this paper, we investigate whether multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms can be used to understand iterative combinatorial auctions, given that these algorithms have recently shown empirical success in several other domains. We find that MARL can indeed benefit auction analysis, but that deploying it effectively is nontrivial. We begin by describing modelling decisions that keep the resulting game tractable without sacrificing important features such as imperfect information or asymmetry between bidders. We also discuss how to navigate pitfalls of various MARL algorithms, how to overcome challenges in verifying convergence, and how to generate and interpret multiple equilibria. We illustrate the promise of our resulting approach by using it to evaluate a specific rule change to a clock auction, finding substantially different auction outcomes due to complex changes in bidders' behavior.
Read more7/25/2024
➖
0
Advancing Ad Auction Realism: Practical Insights & Modeling Implications
Ming Chen, Sareh Nabi, Marciano Siniscalchi
Contemporary real-world online ad auctions differ from canonical models [Edelman et al., 2007; Varian, 2009] in at least four ways: (1) values and click-through rates can depend upon users' search queries, but advertisers can only partially tune their bids to specific queries; (2) advertisers do not know the number, identity, and precise value distribution of competing bidders; (3) advertisers only receive partial, aggregated feedback, and (4) payment rules are only partially known to bidders. These features make it virtually impossible to fully characterize equilibrium bidding behavior. This paper shows that, nevertheless, one can still gain useful insight into modern ad auctions by modeling advertisers as agents governed by an adversarial bandit algorithm, independent of auction mechanism intricacies. To demonstrate our approach, we first simulate soft-floor auctions [Zeithammer, 2019], a complex, real-world pricing rule for which no complete equilibrium characterization is known. We find that (i) when values and click-through rates are query-dependent, soft floors can improve revenues relative to standard auction formats even if bidder types are drawn from the same distribution; and (ii) with distributional asymmetries that reflect relevant real-world scenario, we find that soft floors yield lower revenues than suitably chosen reserve prices, even restricting attention to a single query. We then demonstrate how to infer advertiser value distributions from observed bids for a variety of pricing rules, and illustrate our approach with aggregate data from an e-commerce website.
Read more4/11/2024