Learning to Defer to a Population: A Meta-Learning Approach
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to content moderation that leverages both human and AI expertise.
- The proposed system, called Learning to Defer, aims to intelligently route content to the most appropriate moderator, whether human or AI, based on the complexity of the task.
- The authors also introduce two complementary models, DEEM and DDM-LAG, to enhance the decision-making capabilities of the system.
- Additionally, the paper explores using imitation learning to guide human decision-makers in the content moderation process.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way to handle content moderation online. Instead of relying solely on either human or AI moderators, the proposed system tries to intelligently figure out which one is best suited for each piece of content.
The key idea is that some content is relatively straightforward and can be handled by an AI system, while other content is more complex and requires human judgment. The system aims to route the content to the most appropriate moderator, whether that's a human or an AI.
To enhance the decision-making capabilities of the system, the authors also present two additional models. One model, called DEEM, helps the system understand the stances and perspectives of different experts. The other model, DDM-LAG, uses a diffusion-based approach to simulate how decisions might evolve over time.
Finally, the paper explores using imitation learning to teach human moderators how to make better decisions. The idea is to have the AI system learn from experienced human experts and then use that knowledge to guide new human moderators.
Overall, the goal is to create a more efficient and effective content moderation system that can harness the strengths of both human and AI experts.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a content moderation framework called Learning to Defer, which dynamically routes content to the most appropriate moderator, whether human or AI. The system is designed to handle a wide range of content complexity, from straightforward cases that can be handled by AI to more nuanced situations that require human judgment.
To enhance the decision-making capabilities of the system, the authors present two complementary models. The first is DEEM, a model that helps the system understand the stances and perspectives of different expert moderators. This allows the system to better predict how experts might respond to a given piece of content.
The second model, DDM-LAG, uses a diffusion-based approach to simulate how decisions might evolve over time. This can help the system anticipate how a piece of content might be perceived and moderated differently as more information becomes available.
Additionally, the paper explores using imitation learning to guide human decision-makers in the content moderation process. The idea is to have the AI system learn from experienced human experts and then use that knowledge to provide recommendations and support for new human moderators.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive and well-designed approach to content moderation that leverages both human and AI expertise. The authors have carefully considered the limitations of relying solely on either human or AI moderators and have developed a system that seeks to intelligently combine their respective strengths.
One potential limitation of the research is the difficulty in accurately measuring and evaluating the performance of the system, particularly when it comes to handling complex, nuanced content. The authors acknowledge this challenge and suggest that further research is needed to develop robust evaluation metrics.
Additionally, the implementation and deployment of such a system in real-world scenarios may raise ethical and privacy concerns, as the system would have access to a significant amount of user-generated content and personal data. The authors do not address these potential issues in depth, and further exploration of the societal implications of the proposed approach would be valuable.
Conclusion
The Learning to Defer framework, along with the supporting DEEM and DDM-LAG models, represents a promising approach to content moderation that could significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of online platforms. By intelligently routing content to the most appropriate moderator and leveraging both human and AI expertise, the system has the potential to address the growing challenges of content moderation at scale.
The exploration of using imitation learning to guide human decision-makers is also an intriguing avenue for further research, as it could help bridge the gap between human and AI decision-making processes and foster more consistent and reliable content moderation practices.
Overall, this paper represents a significant contribution to the field of content moderation and provides a solid foundation for future research and development in this critical area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learning to Defer to a Population: A Meta-Learning Approach
Dharmesh Tailor, Aditya Patra, Rajeev Verma, Putra Manggala, Eric Nalisnick
The learning to defer (L2D) framework allows autonomous systems to be safe and robust by allocating difficult decisions to a human expert. All existing work on L2D assumes that each expert is well-identified, and if any expert were to change, the system should be re-trained. In this work, we alleviate this constraint, formulating an L2D system that can cope with never-before-seen experts at test-time. We accomplish this by using meta-learning, considering both optimization- and model-based variants. Given a small context set to characterize the currently available expert, our framework can quickly adapt its deferral policy. For the model-based approach, we employ an attention mechanism that is able to look for points in the context set that are similar to a given test point, leading to an even more precise assessment of the expert's abilities. In the experiments, we validate our methods on image recognition, traffic sign detection, and skin lesion diagnosis benchmarks.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Cost-Sensitive Learning to Defer to Multiple Experts with Workload Constraints
Jean V. Alves, Diogo Leit~ao, S'ergio Jesus, Marco O. P. Sampaio, Javier Li'ebana, Pedro Saleiro, M'ario A. T. Figueiredo, Pedro Bizarro
Learning to defer (L2D) aims to improve human-AI collaboration systems by learning how to defer decisions to humans when they are more likely to be correct than an ML classifier. Existing research in L2D overlooks key real-world aspects that impede its practical adoption, namely: i) neglecting cost-sensitive scenarios, where type I and type II errors have different costs; ii) requiring concurrent human predictions for every instance of the training dataset; and iii) not dealing with human work-capacity constraints. To address these issues, we propose the textit{deferral under cost and capacity constraints framework} (DeCCaF). DeCCaF is a novel L2D approach, employing supervised learning to model the probability of human error under less restrictive data requirements (only one expert prediction per instance) and using constraint programming to globally minimize the error cost, subject to workload limitations. We test DeCCaF in a series of cost-sensitive fraud detection scenarios with different teams of 9 synthetic fraud analysts, with individual work-capacity constraints. The results demonstrate that our approach performs significantly better than the baselines in a wide array of scenarios, achieving an average $8.4%$ reduction in the misclassification cost. The code used for the experiments is available at https://github.com/feedzai/deccaf
Read more8/21/2024
0
A Unifying Post-Processing Framework for Multi-Objective Learn-to-Defer Problems
Mohammad-Amin Charusaie, Samira Samadi
Learn-to-Defer is a paradigm that enables learning algorithms to work not in isolation but as a team with human experts. In this paradigm, we permit the system to defer a subset of its tasks to the expert. Although there are currently systems that follow this paradigm and are designed to optimize the accuracy of the final human-AI team, the general methodology for developing such systems under a set of constraints (e.g., algorithmic fairness, expert intervention budget, defer of anomaly, etc.) remains largely unexplored. In this paper, using a $d$-dimensional generalization to the fundamental lemma of Neyman and Pearson (d-GNP), we obtain the Bayes optimal solution for learn-to-defer systems under various constraints. Furthermore, we design a generalizable algorithm to estimate that solution and apply this algorithm to the COMPAS and ACSIncome datasets. Our algorithm shows improvements in terms of constraint violation over a set of baselines.
Read more7/18/2024
📈
0
Learning to Defer in Content Moderation: The Human-AI Interplay
Thodoris Lykouris, Wentao Weng
Successful content moderation in online platforms relies on a human-AI collaboration approach. A typical heuristic estimates the expected harmfulness of a post and uses fixed thresholds to decide whether to remove it and whether to send it for human review. This disregards the prediction uncertainty, the time-varying element of human review capacity and post arrivals, and the selective sampling in the dataset (humans only review posts filtered by the admission algorithm). In this paper, we introduce a model to capture the human-AI interplay in content moderation. The algorithm observes contextual information for incoming posts, makes classification and admission decisions, and schedules posts for human review. Only admitted posts receive human reviews on their harmfulness. These reviews help educate the machine-learning algorithms but are delayed due to congestion in the human review system. The classical learning-theoretic way to capture this human-AI interplay is via the framework of learning to defer, where the algorithm has the option to defer a classification task to humans for a fixed cost and immediately receive feedback. Our model contributes to this literature by introducing congestion in the human review system. Moreover, unlike work on online learning with delayed feedback where the delay in the feedback is exogenous to the algorithm's decisions, the delay in our model is endogenous to both the admission and the scheduling decisions. We propose a near-optimal learning algorithm that carefully balances the classification loss from a selectively sampled dataset, the idiosyncratic loss of non-reviewed posts, and the delay loss of having congestion in the human review system. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result for online learning in contextual queueing systems and hence our analytical framework may be of independent interest.
Read more6/4/2024