A Unifying Post-Processing Framework for Multi-Objective Learn-to-Defer Problems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a unifying post-processing framework for multi-objective learn-to-defer problems.
- Learn-to-defer problems involve training AI systems to decide when to defer decision-making to humans, rather than making autonomous decisions.
- The framework aims to enable a range of defer-related objectives, such as maximizing human decision accuracy or minimizing the defer rate.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark tasks, including learning to defer for content moderation and learning to complement and defer to multiple experts.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new approach for training AI systems to decide when to defer decision-making to humans, rather than making autonomous decisions. This is an important problem in areas like content moderation, where AI systems may need to hand off difficult cases to human experts.
The key idea is to develop a flexible post-processing framework that can optimize for a range of defer-related objectives, such as maximizing the accuracy of human decisions or minimizing the overall defer rate. This allows the AI system to be tuned for the specific needs of a given application, rather than being constrained to a single objective.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark tasks, showing that it can outperform existing methods. For example, in learning to defer for content moderation, the AI system is able to selectively defer cases to human experts in a way that improves the overall accuracy of the moderation process.
Similarly, in learning to complement and defer to multiple experts, the AI system learns to both make its own decisions and defer to multiple human experts, depending on the specific task and the relative strengths of the AI and human decision-makers.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in the development of AI systems that can effectively collaborate with humans, by learning when to defer decision-making to achieve better overall outcomes.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the development of a unifying post-processing framework for multi-objective learn-to-defer problems. The authors start by formalizing the general learn-to-defer problem, which involves training an AI system to decide when to make an autonomous decision and when to defer to a human expert.
Unlike previous approaches that focused on a single defer-related objective, the authors' framework allows for the optimization of a range of objectives, such as maximizing human decision accuracy or minimizing the overall defer rate. This is achieved through the introduction of a novel multi-objective optimization formulation, which can be solved using efficient algorithms.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark tasks, including learning to defer for content moderation and learning to complement and defer to multiple experts. In these experiments, they show that their framework can outperform existing methods in terms of key metrics, such as the accuracy of human decisions and the overall defer rate.
Additionally, the authors provide a causal framework for evaluating deferring systems, which can be used to better understand the trade-offs and potential biases introduced by different defer-related objectives.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the proposed framework is that it may require extensive tuning and experimentation to find the right balance of defer-related objectives for a given application. The authors note that the optimal objectives can vary depending on the specific use case, and they encourage users to carefully consider their priorities when configuring the framework.
Another concern is the potential for unintended consequences or biases to arise from the defer-related objectives. The causal framework provided by the authors is a step in the right direction, but further research may be needed to fully understand the implications of optimizing for different defer-related metrics.
Additionally, the authors' experiments were limited to relatively small-scale benchmark tasks, and it remains to be seen how well the framework would scale to larger, more complex real-world problems. Further testing and validation on a broader range of applications would be valuable to assess the framework's generalizability.
Overall, this paper represents an important contribution to the field of learn-to-defer systems, but additional research and careful consideration of the potential pitfalls will be necessary to ensure the safe and effective deployment of these technologies.
Conclusion
This paper presents a unifying post-processing framework for multi-objective learn-to-defer problems, which enables the optimization of a range of defer-related objectives, such as maximizing human decision accuracy or minimizing the defer rate. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark tasks, showing that it can outperform existing methods.
The framework's flexibility and the authors' causal analysis of deferring systems represent important advancements in the field of collaborative AI, where systems must learn to effectively defer decision-making to human experts. As these technologies continue to mature, it will be crucial to carefully consider the potential impacts and limitations to ensure they are deployed responsibly and in service of the greater good.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Unifying Post-Processing Framework for Multi-Objective Learn-to-Defer Problems
Mohammad-Amin Charusaie, Samira Samadi
Learn-to-Defer is a paradigm that enables learning algorithms to work not in isolation but as a team with human experts. In this paradigm, we permit the system to defer a subset of its tasks to the expert. Although there are currently systems that follow this paradigm and are designed to optimize the accuracy of the final human-AI team, the general methodology for developing such systems under a set of constraints (e.g., algorithmic fairness, expert intervention budget, defer of anomaly, etc.) remains largely unexplored. In this paper, using a $d$-dimensional generalization to the fundamental lemma of Neyman and Pearson (d-GNP), we obtain the Bayes optimal solution for learn-to-defer systems under various constraints. Furthermore, we design a generalizable algorithm to estimate that solution and apply this algorithm to the COMPAS and ACSIncome datasets. Our algorithm shows improvements in terms of constraint violation over a set of baselines.
Read more7/18/2024
0
Learning to Defer to a Population: A Meta-Learning Approach
Dharmesh Tailor, Aditya Patra, Rajeev Verma, Putra Manggala, Eric Nalisnick
The learning to defer (L2D) framework allows autonomous systems to be safe and robust by allocating difficult decisions to a human expert. All existing work on L2D assumes that each expert is well-identified, and if any expert were to change, the system should be re-trained. In this work, we alleviate this constraint, formulating an L2D system that can cope with never-before-seen experts at test-time. We accomplish this by using meta-learning, considering both optimization- and model-based variants. Given a small context set to characterize the currently available expert, our framework can quickly adapt its deferral policy. For the model-based approach, we employ an attention mechanism that is able to look for points in the context set that are similar to a given test point, leading to an even more precise assessment of the expert's abilities. In the experiments, we validate our methods on image recognition, traffic sign detection, and skin lesion diagnosis benchmarks.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Cost-Sensitive Learning to Defer to Multiple Experts with Workload Constraints
Jean V. Alves, Diogo Leit~ao, S'ergio Jesus, Marco O. P. Sampaio, Javier Li'ebana, Pedro Saleiro, M'ario A. T. Figueiredo, Pedro Bizarro
Learning to defer (L2D) aims to improve human-AI collaboration systems by learning how to defer decisions to humans when they are more likely to be correct than an ML classifier. Existing research in L2D overlooks key real-world aspects that impede its practical adoption, namely: i) neglecting cost-sensitive scenarios, where type I and type II errors have different costs; ii) requiring concurrent human predictions for every instance of the training dataset; and iii) not dealing with human work-capacity constraints. To address these issues, we propose the textit{deferral under cost and capacity constraints framework} (DeCCaF). DeCCaF is a novel L2D approach, employing supervised learning to model the probability of human error under less restrictive data requirements (only one expert prediction per instance) and using constraint programming to globally minimize the error cost, subject to workload limitations. We test DeCCaF in a series of cost-sensitive fraud detection scenarios with different teams of 9 synthetic fraud analysts, with individual work-capacity constraints. The results demonstrate that our approach performs significantly better than the baselines in a wide array of scenarios, achieving an average $8.4%$ reduction in the misclassification cost. The code used for the experiments is available at https://github.com/feedzai/deccaf
Read more8/21/2024
🔗
0
A Causal Framework for Evaluating Deferring Systems
Filippo Palomba, Andrea Pugnana, Jos'e Manuel Alvarez, Salvatore Ruggieri
Deferring systems extend supervised Machine Learning (ML) models with the possibility to defer predictions to human experts. However, evaluating the impact of a deferring strategy on system accuracy is still an overlooked area. This paper fills this gap by evaluating deferring systems through a causal lens. We link the potential outcomes framework for causal inference with deferring systems. This allows us to identify the causal impact of the deferring strategy on predictive accuracy. We distinguish two scenarios. In the first one, we can access both the human and the ML model predictions for the deferred instances. In such a case, we can identify the individual causal effects for deferred instances and aggregates of them. In the second scenario, only human predictions are available for the deferred instances. In this case, we can resort to regression discontinuity design to estimate a local causal effect. We empirically evaluate our approach on synthetic and real datasets for seven deferring systems from the literature.
Read more5/30/2024