Learning When to Retrieve, What to Rewrite, and How to Respond in Conversational QA
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach for conversational question answering (QA) that learns when to retrieve information, what to rewrite, and how to respond.
- The system uses a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) model, which combines a retriever and a generator to produce answers.
- The key innovations are techniques for dynamically determining when to retrieve, what to rewrite, and how to generate the final response.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a system for having conversations and answering questions. The core idea is to combine two different models - a retriever that finds relevant information, and a generator that uses that information to produce a final answer.
The system has to make several decisions during the conversation:
- When to retrieve: Deciding if it needs to look up additional information to answer the current question.
- What to rewrite: Determining which parts of the retrieved information should be rewritten or rephrased to create a coherent response.
- How to respond: Generating the final answer in a natural, conversational way.
The researchers developed techniques to automatically learn how to make these decisions, rather than relying on predefined rules. This allows the system to be more flexible and adaptive in its responses.
The goal is to create a conversational QA system that can engage in more natural, context-aware dialogues, drawing upon relevant information as needed to provide useful and coherent answers.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) model for conversational QA. RAG combines a retriever module, which searches for relevant information, and a generator module, which uses that information to produce the final answer.
The key innovations are:
-
Dynamic Retrieval: The system learns when to trigger the retriever, rather than always retrieving information. This allows it to balance the need for additional context with the risk of introducing irrelevant or redundant information.
-
Selective Rewriting: The generator learns which parts of the retrieved information to rewrite or rephrase, in order to construct a coherent and natural-sounding response.
-
Contextual Response Generation: The generator uses the current conversation context, in addition to the retrieved information, to produce the final answer. This helps maintain the flow and relevance of the dialogue.
The system is trained end-to-end using a combination of retrieval, rewriting, and generation objectives. Experiments on several conversational QA benchmarks show that this approach outperforms prior retrieval-augmented and generation-only models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough approach to addressing the challenges of conversational QA. The dynamic retrieval and selective rewriting techniques are novel contributions that allow the system to be more flexible and adaptive in its responses.
However, the evaluation is limited to fairly narrow conversational QA tasks. It would be valuable to see how the system performs on more open-ended, freeform conversations, where the need to accurately assess when to retrieve information and how to integrate it into the response may be even more critical.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential ethical or societal implications of such a system. As conversational AI becomes more advanced, it will be important to consider issues around bias, privacy, and the impact on human-human interactions.
Overall, this is a promising step towards more natural and context-aware conversational QA systems. Further research and real-world deployments will be necessary to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) model for conversational question answering. The key innovations are techniques for dynamically determining when to retrieve information, what to rewrite, and how to generate the final response.
The results show that this approach can outperform prior retrieval-augmented and generation-only models on conversational QA tasks. The dynamic and selective use of retrieval and rewriting enables the system to provide more coherent and relevant answers, while maintaining a natural conversational flow.
As conversational AI systems become more advanced, approaches like this will be crucial for enabling more natural and context-aware dialogues. However, further research is needed to understand the broader implications and real-world performance of such systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learning When to Retrieve, What to Rewrite, and How to Respond in Conversational QA
Nirmal Roy, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, Rexhina Blloshmi, Kevin Small
Augmenting Large Language Models (LLMs) with information retrieval capabilities (i.e., Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)) has proven beneficial for knowledge-intensive tasks. However, understanding users' contextual search intent when generating responses is an understudied topic for conversational question answering (QA). This conversational extension leads to additional concerns when compared to single-turn QA as it is more challenging for systems to comprehend conversational context and manage retrieved passages over multiple turns. In this work, we propose a method for enabling LLMs to decide when to retrieve in RAG settings given a conversational context. When retrieval is deemed necessary, the LLM then rewrites the conversation for passage retrieval and judges the relevance of returned passages before response generation. Operationally, we build on the single-turn SELF-RAG framework (Asai et al., 2023) and propose SELF-multi-RAG for conversational settings. SELF-multi-RAG demonstrates improved capabilities over single-turn variants with respect to retrieving relevant passages (by using summarized conversational context) and assessing the quality of generated responses. Experiments on three conversational QA datasets validate the enhanced response generation capabilities of SELF-multi-RAG, with improvements of ~13% measured by human annotation.
Read more9/25/2024
0
RAG based Question-Answering for Contextual Response Prediction System
Sriram Veturi, Saurabh Vaichal, Reshma Lal Jagadheesh, Nafis Irtiza Tripto, Nian Yan
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown versatility in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, including their potential as effective question-answering systems. However, to provide precise and relevant information in response to specific customer queries in industry settings, LLMs require access to a comprehensive knowledge base to avoid hallucinations. Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) emerges as a promising technique to address this challenge. Yet, developing an accurate question-answering framework for real-world applications using RAG entails several challenges: 1) data availability issues, 2) evaluating the quality of generated content, and 3) the costly nature of human evaluation. In this paper, we introduce an end-to-end framework that employs LLMs with RAG capabilities for industry use cases. Given a customer query, the proposed system retrieves relevant knowledge documents and leverages them, along with previous chat history, to generate response suggestions for customer service agents in the contact centers of a major retail company. Through comprehensive automated and human evaluations, we show that this solution outperforms the current BERT-based algorithms in accuracy and relevance. Our findings suggest that RAG-based LLMs can be an excellent support to human customer service representatives by lightening their workload.
Read more9/9/2024
0
Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Conversational Systems
Xi Wang, Procheta Sen, Ruizhe Li, Emine Yilmaz
Despite the success of integrating large language models into the development of conversational systems, many studies have shown the effectiveness of retrieving and augmenting external knowledge for informative responses. Hence, many existing studies commonly assume the always need for Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) in a conversational system without explicit control. This raises a research question about such a necessity. In this study, we propose to investigate the need for each turn of system response to be augmented with external knowledge. In particular, by leveraging human judgements on the binary choice of adaptive augmentation, we develop RAGate, a gating model, which models conversation context and relevant inputs to predict if a conversational system requires RAG for improved responses. We conduct extensive experiments on devising and applying RAGate to conversational models and well-rounded analyses of different conversational scenarios. Our experimental results and analysis indicate the effective application of RAGate in RAG-based conversational systems in identifying system responses for appropriate RAG with high-quality responses and a high generation confidence. This study also identifies the correlation between the generation's confidence level and the relevance of the augmented knowledge.
Read more8/1/2024
💬
0
A Survey on RAG Meets LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Wenqi Fan, Yujuan Ding, Liangbo Ning, Shijie Wang, Hengyun Li, Dawei Yin, Tat-Seng Chua, Qing Li
As one of the most advanced techniques in AI, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can offer reliable and up-to-date external knowledge, providing huge convenience for numerous tasks. Particularly in the era of AI-Generated Content (AIGC), the powerful capacity of retrieval in providing additional knowledge enables RAG to assist existing generative AI in producing high-quality outputs. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated revolutionary abilities in language understanding and generation, while still facing inherent limitations, such as hallucinations and out-of-date internal knowledge. Given the powerful abilities of RAG in providing the latest and helpful auxiliary information, Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models (RA-LLMs) have emerged to harness external and authoritative knowledge bases, rather than solely relying on the model's internal knowledge, to augment the generation quality of LLMs. In this survey, we comprehensively review existing research studies in RA-LLMs, covering three primary technical perspectives: architectures, training strategies, and applications. As the preliminary knowledge, we briefly introduce the foundations and recent advances of LLMs. Then, to illustrate the practical significance of RAG for LLMs, we systematically review mainstream relevant work by their architectures, training strategies, and application areas, detailing specifically the challenges of each and the corresponding capabilities of RA-LLMs. Finally, to deliver deeper insights, we discuss current limitations and several promising directions for future research. Updated information about this survey can be found at https://advanced-recommender-systems.github.io/RAG-Meets-LLMs/
Read more6/18/2024