A Legal Framework for Natural Language Processing Model Training in Portugal
2405.00536
0
0
Abstract
Recent advances in deep learning have promoted the advent of many computational systems capable of performing intelligent actions that, until then, were restricted to the human intellect. In the particular case of human languages, these advances allowed the introduction of applications like ChatGPT that are capable of generating coherent text without being explicitly programmed to do so. Instead, these models use large volumes of textual data to learn meaningful representations of human languages. Associated with these advances, concerns about copyright and data privacy infringements caused by these applications have emerged. Despite these concerns, the pace at which new natural language processing applications continued to be developed largely outperformed the introduction of new regulations. Today, communication barriers between legal experts and computer scientists motivate many unintentional legal infringements during the development of such applications. In this paper, a multidisciplinary team intends to bridge this communication gap and promote more compliant Portuguese NLP research by presenting a series of everyday NLP use cases, while highlighting the Portuguese legislation that may arise during its development.
Create account to get full access
Overview
ā¢ This paper proposes a legal framework for natural language processing (NLP) model training in Portugal, addressing the challenges of data privacy, intellectual property, and regulatory compliance. ā¢ The framework aims to enable responsible AI development while ensuring the protection of individual rights and the broader public interest. ā¢ The paper examines the current legal landscape in Portugal, identifies key issues, and suggests a comprehensive approach to address them.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on developing a legal framework for training NLP models in Portugal. NLP is a field of artificial intelligence that enables computers to understand and process human language. As the use of NLP models becomes more widespread, there are growing concerns about data privacy, intellectual property rights, and regulatory compliance.
The researchers in this paper recognize the need to balance the benefits of NLP technology with the protection of individual rights and the public interest. They examine the existing legal landscape in Portugal and identify the key challenges, such as ensuring the responsible use of personal data and addressing intellectual property issues.
The proposed legal framework aims to provide a comprehensive solution to these challenges. It outlines guidelines and regulations to enable the development of NLP models while safeguarding the rights of individuals and the broader public. This could involve measures like obtaining informed consent from data subjects, ensuring the ethical use of data, and establishing clear guidelines for intellectual property rights.
By addressing these legal and regulatory issues, the framework aims to create an environment that fosters responsible AI development and innovation in Portugal, while upholding the principles of data privacy and public welfare.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing the existing legal and regulatory landscape in Portugal, highlighting the key issues that need to be addressed for NLP model training. These include data privacy, intellectual property rights, and compliance with relevant laws and regulations.
The researchers then propose a comprehensive legal framework to address these challenges. The framework outlines a set of guidelines and regulations that govern the training and deployment of NLP models in Portugal. Some of the key elements of the framework include:
-
Data Privacy: The framework establishes protocols for obtaining informed consent from individuals whose data is used in model training. It also includes measures to ensure the secure storage and processing of personal data, in line with data protection regulations.
-
Intellectual Property Rights: The framework provides clear guidelines on the ownership and licensing of intellectual property (IP) associated with NLP models. This includes addressing issues around the use of third-party data and algorithms.
-
Regulatory Compliance: The framework aligns with relevant laws and regulations, such as those governing the use of AI in specific industries or the protection of vulnerable populations. It outlines a process for model auditing and certification to ensure compliance.
-
Ethical Considerations: The framework incorporates ethical principles, such as fairness, transparency, and accountability, into the development and deployment of NLP models. This includes measures to mitigate potential biases and ensure the responsible use of the technology.
The paper also discusses the potential implementation challenges and how the proposed framework could be adapted to the evolving legal and technological landscape in Portugal and potentially other jurisdictions.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-researched and comprehensive approach to addressing the legal and regulatory challenges associated with NLP model training in Portugal. The proposed framework appears to be a thoughtful and balanced attempt to enable responsible AI development while protecting individual rights and the public interest.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it focuses solely on the Portuguese context, and the applicability of the framework to other jurisdictions may require further research and adaptation. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the practical implementation details, such as the specific mechanisms for model auditing and certification.
While the paper raises important considerations, it would benefit from a more critical examination of potential pitfalls or unintended consequences that may arise from the proposed framework. For example, the impact on innovation and the ability of smaller organizations to navigate the regulatory landscape could be further explored.
Furthermore, the paper could have provided a more nuanced discussion on the inherent tensions and trade-offs involved in balancing the benefits of NLP technology with the protection of individual privacy and public welfare. A more in-depth analysis of these complexities could have strengthened the critical analysis and encouraged readers to think more deeply about the challenges and considerations at play.
Conclusion
The paper presents a well-conceived legal framework for NLP model training in Portugal, addressing key issues such as data privacy, intellectual property rights, and regulatory compliance. By proposing a comprehensive approach, the researchers aim to enable responsible AI development while safeguarding individual rights and the public interest.
The framework's potential to be adapted and applied in other jurisdictions is an intriguing prospect, as the challenges faced in NLP model training are not unique to Portugal. The successful implementation of this framework could serve as a model for other countries seeking to strike a balance between technological progress and the protection of fundamental rights.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion on the legal and regulatory aspects of AI development, particularly in the context of natural language processing. As the field of AI continues to evolve, research like this will be crucial in ensuring that the benefits of these technologies are harnessed in a responsible and ethical manner.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
šæ
Towards A Structured Overview of Use Cases for Natural Language Processing in the Legal Domain: A German Perspective
Juraj Vladika, Stephen Meisenbacher, Martina Preis, Alexandra Klymenko, Florian Matthes
0
0
In recent years, the field of Legal Tech has risen in prevalence, as the Natural Language Processing (NLP) and legal disciplines have combined forces to digitalize legal processes. Amidst the steady flow of research solutions stemming from the NLP domain, the study of use cases has fallen behind, leading to a number of innovative technical methods without a place in practice. In this work, we aim to build a structured overview of Legal Tech use cases, grounded in NLP literature, but also supplemented by voices from legal practice in Germany. Based upon a Systematic Literature Review, we identify seven categories of NLP technologies for the legal domain, which are then studied in juxtaposition to 22 legal use cases. In the investigation of these use cases, we identify 15 ethical, legal, and social aspects (ELSA), shedding light on the potential concerns of digitally transforming the legal domain.
5/3/2024
Large Language Models: A New Approach for Privacy Policy Analysis at Scale
David Rodriguez, Ian Yang, Jose M. Del Alamo, Norman Sadeh
0
0
The number and dynamic nature of web and mobile applications presents significant challenges for assessing their compliance with data protection laws. In this context, symbolic and statistical Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques have been employed for the automated analysis of these systems' privacy policies. However, these techniques typically require labor-intensive and potentially error-prone manually annotated datasets for training and validation. This research proposes the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) as an alternative for effectively and efficiently extracting privacy practices from privacy policies at scale. Particularly, we leverage well-known LLMs such as ChatGPT and Llama 2, and offer guidance on the optimal design of prompts, parameters, and models, incorporating advanced strategies such as few-shot learning. We further illustrate its capability to detect detailed and varied privacy practices accurately. Using several renowned datasets in the domain as a benchmark, our evaluation validates its exceptional performance, achieving an F1 score exceeding 93%. Besides, it does so with reduced costs, faster processing times, and fewer technical knowledge requirements. Consequently, we advocate for LLM-based solutions as a sound alternative to traditional NLP techniques for the automated analysis of privacy policies at scale.
6/3/2024
š¬
Legal Documents Drafting with Fine-Tuned Pre-Trained Large Language Model
Chun-Hsien Lin, Pu-Jen Cheng
0
0
With the development of large-scale Language Models (LLM), fine-tuning pre-trained LLM has become a mainstream paradigm for solving downstream tasks of natural language processing. However, training a language model in the legal field requires a large number of legal documents so that the language model can learn legal terminology and the particularity of the format of legal documents. The typical NLP approaches usually rely on many manually annotated data sets for training. However, in the legal field application, it is difficult to obtain a large number of manually annotated data sets, which restricts the typical method applied to the task of drafting legal documents. The experimental results of this paper show that not only can we leverage a large number of annotation-free legal documents without Chinese word segmentation to fine-tune a large-scale language model, but more importantly, it can fine-tune a pre-trained LLM on the local computer to achieve the generating legal document drafts task, and at the same time achieve the protection of information privacy and to improve information security issues.
6/7/2024
š
Towards Supporting Legal Argumentation with NLP: Is More Data Really All You Need?
T. Y. S. S Santosh, Kevin D. Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Matthias Grabmair
0
0
Modeling legal reasoning and argumentation justifying decisions in cases has always been central to AI & Law, yet contemporary developments in legal NLP have increasingly focused on statistically classifying legal conclusions from text. While conceptually simpler, these approaches often fall short in providing usable justifications connecting to appropriate legal concepts. This paper reviews both traditional symbolic works in AI & Law and recent advances in legal NLP, and distills possibilities of integrating expert-informed knowledge to strike a balance between scalability and explanation in symbolic vs. data-driven approaches. We identify open challenges and discuss the potential of modern NLP models and methods that integrate
6/18/2024