Towards A Structured Overview of Use Cases for Natural Language Processing in the Legal Domain: A German Perspective
2404.18759
0
0
šæ
Abstract
In recent years, the field of Legal Tech has risen in prevalence, as the Natural Language Processing (NLP) and legal disciplines have combined forces to digitalize legal processes. Amidst the steady flow of research solutions stemming from the NLP domain, the study of use cases has fallen behind, leading to a number of innovative technical methods without a place in practice. In this work, we aim to build a structured overview of Legal Tech use cases, grounded in NLP literature, but also supplemented by voices from legal practice in Germany. Based upon a Systematic Literature Review, we identify seven categories of NLP technologies for the legal domain, which are then studied in juxtaposition to 22 legal use cases. In the investigation of these use cases, we identify 15 ethical, legal, and social aspects (ELSA), shedding light on the potential concerns of digitally transforming the legal domain.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the growing field of Legal Tech, where Natural Language Processing (NLP) and legal disciplines are converging to digitalize legal processes.
- The study aims to build a structured overview of Legal Tech use cases, drawing insights from both NLP literature and legal practitioners in Germany.
- The researchers identify seven categories of NLP technologies for the legal domain and investigate 22 corresponding use cases, highlighting 15 ethical, legal, and social aspects (ELSA) related to the digital transformation of the legal field.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the rise of Legal Tech, which is the application of advanced technologies like Natural Language Processing (NLP) to legal processes. As NLP has advanced, many new technical solutions have been developed, but the researchers found that the real-world use cases for these technologies have not been well studied.
To address this, the researchers looked at both the NLP research and the perspectives of legal practitioners in Germany. They identified seven key areas where NLP is being used in legal work, such as summarizing legal documents or automating legal research. They then examined 22 specific use cases, and highlighted 15 important ethical, legal, and social considerations around using these technologies in the legal field.
The goal was to provide a comprehensive overview that bridges the gap between the technical NLP advances and the practical needs and concerns of the legal community. By understanding both the capabilities of the technology and the real-world implications, the researchers hope to guide the development of Legal Tech in a responsible and beneficial way.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a Systematic Literature Review to identify the key NLP technologies being applied in the legal domain. They categorized these into seven areas: document summarization, document classification, legal text retrieval, legal question answering, legal text generation, legal named entity recognition, and legal relation extraction.
To understand the practical use cases for these technologies, the researchers then interviewed legal practitioners in Germany and identified 22 distinct use cases, such as automating contract review, generating legal documents, and providing personalized legal advice. For each use case, the researchers analyzed the underlying NLP techniques, the potential benefits, and the relevant ethical, legal, and social aspects (ELSA).
The ELSA analysis revealed 15 key considerations, including data privacy, algorithmic bias, transparency and explainability, human-AI collaboration, and professional liability. These insights highlight the complex challenges that must be navigated as Legal Tech becomes more widely adopted.
Critical Analysis
The researchers provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of Legal Tech, bridging the gap between technical NLP capabilities and real-world legal applications. By grounding their analysis in both academic literature and practitioner perspectives, they offer a balanced and nuanced understanding of the field.
However, the study is limited to the German legal context, and the generalizability of the findings to other jurisdictions and legal systems is not explicitly addressed. Additionally, the researchers acknowledge that their ELSA analysis may not be exhaustive, and there may be other important ethical and societal implications that warrant further investigation.
It would be valuable for future research to expand the geographical scope, explore the perspectives of other stakeholders (e.g., legal clients, policymakers), and delve deeper into the long-term societal impact of Legal Tech, particularly in areas such as access to justice and the evolving role of legal professionals.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive and insightful exploration of the emerging field of Legal Tech, where the power of NLP is being harnessed to transform legal processes. By identifying key use cases and highlighting the associated ethical, legal, and social considerations, the researchers have laid the groundwork for a more informed and responsible development of Legal Tech.
As the adoption of these technologies accelerates, it will be crucial to continue studying the implications and ensuring that the benefits of Legal Tech are realized while mitigating potential risks and unintended consequences. This research serves as an important step in that direction, and a valuable resource for both the technical and legal communities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Legal Framework for Natural Language Processing Model Training in Portugal
R'uben Almeida, Evelin Amorim
0
0
Recent advances in deep learning have promoted the advent of many computational systems capable of performing intelligent actions that, until then, were restricted to the human intellect. In the particular case of human languages, these advances allowed the introduction of applications like ChatGPT that are capable of generating coherent text without being explicitly programmed to do so. Instead, these models use large volumes of textual data to learn meaningful representations of human languages. Associated with these advances, concerns about copyright and data privacy infringements caused by these applications have emerged. Despite these concerns, the pace at which new natural language processing applications continued to be developed largely outperformed the introduction of new regulations. Today, communication barriers between legal experts and computer scientists motivate many unintentional legal infringements during the development of such applications. In this paper, a multidisciplinary team intends to bridge this communication gap and promote more compliant Portuguese NLP research by presenting a series of everyday NLP use cases, while highlighting the Portuguese legislation that may arise during its development.
5/2/2024
šæ
Enterprise Use Cases Combining Knowledge Graphs and Natural Language Processing
Phillip Schneider, Tim Schopf, Juraj Vladika, Florian Matthes
0
0
Knowledge management is a critical challenge for enterprises in today's digital world, as the volume and complexity of data being generated and collected continue to grow incessantly. Knowledge graphs (KG) emerged as a promising solution to this problem by providing a flexible, scalable, and semantically rich way to organize and make sense of data. This paper builds upon a recent survey of the research literature on combining KGs and Natural Language Processing (NLP). Based on selected application scenarios from enterprise context, we discuss synergies that result from such a combination. We cover various approaches from the three core areas of KG construction, reasoning as well as KG-based NLP tasks. In addition to explaining innovative enterprise use cases, we assess their maturity in terms of practical applicability and conclude with an outlook on emergent application areas for the future.
4/3/2024
š
Towards Supporting Legal Argumentation with NLP: Is More Data Really All You Need?
T. Y. S. S Santosh, Kevin D. Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Matthias Grabmair
0
0
Modeling legal reasoning and argumentation justifying decisions in cases has always been central to AI & Law, yet contemporary developments in legal NLP have increasingly focused on statistically classifying legal conclusions from text. While conceptually simpler, these approaches often fall short in providing usable justifications connecting to appropriate legal concepts. This paper reviews both traditional symbolic works in AI & Law and recent advances in legal NLP, and distills possibilities of integrating expert-informed knowledge to strike a balance between scalability and explanation in symbolic vs. data-driven approaches. We identify open challenges and discuss the potential of modern NLP models and methods that integrate
6/18/2024
š
Challenges and Opportunities of NLP for HR Applications: A Discussion Paper
Jochen L. Leidner, Mark Stevenson
0
0
Over the course of the recent decade, tremendous progress has been made in the areas of machine learning and natural language processing, which opened up vast areas of potential application use cases, including hiring and human resource management. We review the use cases for text analytics in the realm of human resources/personnel management, including actually realized as well as potential but not yet implemented ones, and we analyze the opportunities and risks of these.
5/14/2024