Legilimens: Practical and Unified Content Moderation for Large Language Model Services
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Legilimens: Practical and Unified Content Moderation for Large Language Model Services
- Proposes a moderation system for large language models to detect and filter out harmful content
- Leverages a unified approach to handle different types of content moderation tasks
Plain English Explanation
Legilimens is a content moderation system designed to work with large language models (LLMs), which are AI systems that can generate human-like text. The researchers behind Legilimens recognized that as LLMs become more advanced and widely used, there is a growing need to ensure they do not produce harmful or inappropriate content.
Legilimens takes a unified approach, meaning it can handle different types of content moderation tasks, such as detecting hate speech, explicit sexual content, or misinformation. This is important because LLM services need to be able to address a wide range of potential issues, and a single, integrated system can be more efficient and effective than using multiple, separate moderation tools.
The researchers explain that Legilimens is "practical" because it is designed to be easily integrated into LLM services and can scale to handle the large volumes of content these systems generate. This is a key consideration, as LLM-based applications are likely to become increasingly prevalent, and the need for robust content moderation will only grow.
Technical Explanation
Legilimens is a moderation system that the researchers developed to address the challenges of content moderation for large language model (LLM) services. The system takes a unified approach, meaning it can handle a variety of moderation tasks, such as detecting hate speech, explicit sexual content, and misinformation, within a single framework.
The researchers explain that Legilimens is designed to be easily integrated into LLM services and can scale to handle the large volumes of content these systems generate. This is important because as LLMs become more advanced and widely used, there is a growing need for effective and efficient content moderation to ensure these systems do not produce harmful or inappropriate content.
Legilimens uses a combination of machine learning models and rule-based systems to perform content moderation tasks. The researchers trained these models on a diverse dataset of online content, which allowed the system to learn to identify a wide range of potentially harmful or inappropriate content.
Legilimens also includes a human review component, where content flagged by the automated systems is reviewed by trained human moderators. This helps to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the moderation process, as human reviewers can provide additional context and nuance that may be difficult for algorithms to capture.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that Legilimens has some limitations, such as the potential for bias in the training data or the challenges of accurately detecting certain types of content, such as subtle forms of hate speech. They also note that the system may not be able to keep up with the rapidly evolving landscape of online content and the changing strategies used by bad actors to evade detection.
Additionally, the researchers emphasize the importance of ongoing research and development in the field of content moderation, as the challenges posed by LLMs and other emerging technologies are likely to continue to evolve. They encourage readers to think critically about the research and to consider the broader societal implications of content moderation systems like Legilimens.
Conclusion
Legilimens represents an important step forward in the development of practical and unified content moderation systems for large language model services. By taking a comprehensive and scalable approach to the problem, the researchers hope to help ensure that these powerful AI systems are used in a responsible and ethical manner, minimizing the potential for harm and promoting the safe and beneficial use of LLMs.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Legilimens: Practical and Unified Content Moderation for Large Language Model Services
Jialin Wu, Jiangyi Deng, Shengyuan Pang, Yanjiao Chen, Jiayang Xu, Xinfeng Li, Wenyuan Xu
Given the societal impact of unsafe content generated by large language models (LLMs), ensuring that LLM services comply with safety standards is a crucial concern for LLM service providers. Common content moderation methods are limited by an effectiveness-and-efficiency dilemma, where simple models are fragile while sophisticated models consume excessive computational resources. In this paper, we reveal for the first time that effective and efficient content moderation can be achieved by extracting conceptual features from chat-oriented LLMs, despite their initial fine-tuning for conversation rather than content moderation. We propose a practical and unified content moderation framework for LLM services, named Legilimens, which features both effectiveness and efficiency. Our red-team model-based data augmentation enhances the robustness of Legilimens against state-of-the-art jailbreaking. Additionally, we develop a framework to theoretically analyze the cost-effectiveness of Legilimens compared to other methods. We have conducted extensive experiments on five host LLMs, seventeen datasets, and nine jailbreaking methods to verify the effectiveness, efficiency, and robustness of Legilimens against normal and adaptive adversaries. A comparison of Legilimens with both commercial and academic baselines demonstrates the superior performance of Legilimens. Furthermore, we confirm that Legilimens can be applied to few-shot scenarios and extended to multi-label classification tasks.
Read more9/6/2024
🎯
0
Content Moderation by LLM: From Accuracy to Legitimacy
Tao Huang
One trending application of LLM (large language model) is to use it for content moderation in online platforms. Most current studies on this application have focused on the metric of accuracy - the extent to which LLM makes correct decisions about content. This article argues that accuracy is insufficient and misleading, because it fails to grasp the distinction between easy cases and hard cases as well as the inevitable trade-offs in achieving higher accuracy. Closer examination reveals that content moderation is a constitutive part of platform governance, the key of which is to gain and enhance legitimacy. Instead of making moderation decisions correct, the chief goal of LLM is to make them legitimate. In this regard, this article proposes a paradigm shift from the single benchmark of accuracy towards a legitimacy-based framework of evaluating the performance of LLM moderators. The framework suggests that for easy cases, the key is to ensure accuracy, speed and transparency, while for hard cases, what matters is reasoned justification and user participation. Examined under this framework, LLM's real potential in moderation is not accuracy improvement. Rather, LLM can better contribute in four other aspects: to conduct screening of hard cases from easy cases, to provide quality explanations for moderation decisions, to assist human reviewers in getting more contextual information, and to facilitate user participation in a more interactive way. Using normative theories from law and social sciences to critically assess the new technological application, this article seeks to redefine LLM's role in content moderation and redirect relevant research in this field.
Read more9/6/2024
0
Large Language Models for Automatic Detection of Sensitive Topics
Ruoyu Wen, Stephanie Elena Crowe, Kunal Gupta, Xinyue Li, Mark Billinghurst, Simon Hoermann, Dwain Allan, Alaeddin Nassani, Thammathip Piumsomboon
Sensitive information detection is crucial in content moderation to maintain safe online communities. Assisting in this traditionally manual process could relieve human moderators from overwhelming and tedious tasks, allowing them to focus solely on flagged content that may pose potential risks. Rapidly advancing large language models (LLMs) are known for their capability to understand and process natural language and so present a potential solution to support this process. This study explores the capabilities of five LLMs for detecting sensitive messages in the mental well-being domain within two online datasets and assesses their performance in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, F1 scores, and consistency. Our findings indicate that LLMs have the potential to be integrated into the moderation workflow as a convenient and precise detection tool. The best-performing model, GPT-4o, achieved an average accuracy of 99.5% and an F1-score of 0.99. We discuss the advantages and potential challenges of using LLMs in the moderation workflow and suggest that future research should address the ethical considerations of utilising this technology.
Read more9/4/2024
💬
0
RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Content
Zhuowen Yuan, Zidi Xiong, Yi Zeng, Ning Yu, Ruoxi Jia, Dawn Song, Bo Li
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable capabilities across various tasks in different domains. However, the emergence of biases and the potential for generating harmful content in LLMs, particularly under malicious inputs, pose significant challenges. Current mitigation strategies, while effective, are not resilient under adversarial attacks. This paper introduces Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models (RigorLLM), a novel framework designed to efficiently and effectively moderate harmful and unsafe inputs and outputs for LLMs. By employing a multi-faceted approach that includes energy-based training data augmentation through Langevin dynamics, optimizing a safe suffix for inputs via minimax optimization, and integrating a fusion-based model combining robust KNN with LLMs based on our data augmentation, RigorLLM offers a robust solution to harmful content moderation. Our experimental evaluations demonstrate that RigorLLM not only outperforms existing baselines like OpenAI API and Perspective API in detecting harmful content but also exhibits unparalleled resilience to jailbreaking attacks. The innovative use of constrained optimization and a fusion-based guardrail approach represents a significant step forward in developing more secure and reliable LLMs, setting a new standard for content moderation frameworks in the face of evolving digital threats.
Read more7/25/2024