Leveraging Large Language Models for Knowledge-free Weak Supervision in Clinical Natural Language Processing
2406.06723
0
0
💬
Abstract
The performance of deep learning-based natural language processing systems is based on large amounts of labeled training data which, in the clinical domain, are not easily available or affordable. Weak supervision and in-context learning offer partial solutions to this issue, particularly using large language models (LLMs), but their performance still trails traditional supervised methods with moderate amounts of gold-standard data. In particular, inferencing with LLMs is computationally heavy. We propose an approach leveraging fine-tuning LLMs and weak supervision with virtually no domain knowledge that still achieves consistently dominant performance. Using a prompt-based approach, the LLM is used to generate weakly-labeled data for training a downstream BERT model. The weakly supervised model is then further fine-tuned on small amounts of gold standard data. We evaluate this approach using Llama2 on three different n2c2 datasets. With no more than 10 gold standard notes, our final BERT models weakly supervised by fine-tuned Llama2-13B consistently outperformed out-of-the-box PubMedBERT by 4.7% to 47.9% in F1 scores. With only 50 gold standard notes, our models achieved close performance to fully fine-tuned systems.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores a new approach to improve the performance of deep learning-based natural language processing (NLP) systems in the clinical domain, where labeled training data is scarce.
- The proposed method leverages fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) and weak supervision to achieve consistently strong performance, even with small amounts of gold-standard data.
- The authors evaluate their approach using the Llama2 model on three different n2c2 datasets, demonstrating significant improvements over existing methods.
Plain English Explanation
Deep learning-based NLP systems, which are widely used for tasks like text classification and summarization, rely on large amounts of labeled training data to perform well. However, in the clinical domain, such data is often not easily available or affordable to collect.
To address this challenge, the researchers explored two promising techniques: weak supervision and in-context learning. Weak supervision allows models to be trained on data that is not perfectly labeled, while in-context learning uses large language models (LLMs) like Llama2 to generate relevant information.
The researchers' approach combines these techniques in a novel way. First, they use an LLM (in this case, Llama2) to generate weakly-labeled data for training a downstream BERT model. Then, they fine-tune the BERT model on a small amount of gold-standard data, which helps it learn the specifics of the clinical domain.
When evaluated on three different n2c2 datasets, this approach consistently outperformed the baseline PubMedBERT model by a significant margin (4.7% to 47.9% in F1 scores), even with just 10 gold-standard notes. With 50 gold-standard notes, the researchers' models achieved close performance to fully fine-tuned systems.
Technical Explanation
The researchers' approach leverages the power of large language models (LLMs) and weak supervision to address the data scarcity problem in the clinical NLP domain. Specifically, they use a prompt-based approach to fine-tune the Llama2-13B model, which then generates weakly-labeled data for training a downstream BERT model.
The weakly supervised BERT model is further fine-tuned on a small amount of gold-standard data, allowing it to learn the specifics of the clinical domain. This approach is evaluated on three different n2c2 datasets, and the results demonstrate that it consistently outperforms the baseline PubMedBERT model by a significant margin, even with just 10 gold-standard notes.
The researchers' approach builds on previous work in weak supervision and in-context learning, which have shown promise in improving the performance of NLP systems when labeled data is scarce. By combining these techniques with fine-tuning of LLMs, the researchers have developed a highly effective solution for the clinical NLP domain.
Critical Analysis
The researchers' approach is a significant contribution to the field of clinical NLP, as it addresses a crucial challenge in the domain – the lack of readily available labeled data. By leveraging the power of large language models and weak supervision, the researchers have demonstrated a practical and effective solution that can be applied to a wide range of clinical NLP tasks.
However, the paper does not discuss the potential limitations of the approach, such as the computational overhead associated with fine-tuning large language models or the potential for bias in the weakly-labeled data. Additionally, the researchers could have explored the performance of their approach on a wider range of clinical NLP tasks, beyond the three n2c2 datasets used in the evaluation.
Overall, the researchers' work represents an important step forward in the field of clinical NLP, and their approach could serve as a foundation for further research and development in this area. Readers are encouraged to critically examine the paper's findings and consider how the proposed method could be applied or extended in their own work.
Conclusion
The researchers have developed a novel approach to improve the performance of deep learning-based natural language processing systems in the clinical domain, where labeled training data is scarce. By leveraging fine-tuning of large language models and weak supervision, they have consistently outperformed existing methods, even with small amounts of gold-standard data.
This work has significant implications for the development of more accurate and accessible clinical NLP tools, which could ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes and more efficient healthcare delivery. As the field of clinical NLP continues to evolve, the researchers' approach may serve as a valuable reference for future work in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners
Linyi Yang, Shuibai Zhang, Zhuohao Yu, Guangsheng Bao, Yidong Wang, Jindong Wang, Ruochen Xu, Wei Ye, Xing Xie, Weizhu Chen, Yue Zhang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering. The recent progress in large-scale generative models has further expanded their use in real-world language applications. However, the critical challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored. While previous in-context learning research has focused on enhancing models to adhere to users' specific instructions and quality expectations, and to avoid undesired outputs, little to no work has explored the use of task-Specific fine-tuned Language Models (SLMs) to improve LLMs' in-context learning during the inference stage. Our primary contribution is the establishment of a simple yet effective framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks. Using our proposed plug-in method, enhanced versions of Llama 2 and ChatGPT surpass their original versions regarding generalizability and factuality. We offer a comprehensive suite of resources, including 16 curated datasets, prompts, model checkpoints, and LLM outputs across 9 distinct tasks. The code and data are released at: https://github.com/YangLinyi/Supervised-Knowledge-Makes-Large-Language-Models-Better-In-context-Learners. Our empirical analysis sheds light on the advantages of incorporating discriminative models into LLMs and highlights the potential of our methodology in fostering more reliable LLMs.
4/12/2024
💬
Optimizing Language Model's Reasoning Abilities with Weak Supervision
Yongqi Tong, Sizhe Wang, Dawei Li, Yifan Wang, Simeng Han, Zi Lin, Chengsong Huang, Jiaxin Huang, Jingbo Shang
0
0
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated proficiency in handling complex queries, much of the past work has depended on extensively annotated datasets by human experts. However, this reliance on fully-supervised annotations poses scalability challenges, particularly as models and data requirements grow. To mitigate this, we explore the potential of enhancing LLMs' reasoning abilities with minimal human supervision. In this work, we introduce self-reinforcement, which begins with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) of the model using a small collection of annotated questions. Then it iteratively improves LLMs by learning from the differences in responses from the SFT and unfinetuned models on unlabeled questions. Our approach provides an efficient approach without relying heavily on extensive human-annotated explanations. However, current reasoning benchmarks typically only include golden-reference answers or rationales. Therefore, we present textsc{PuzzleBen}, a weakly supervised benchmark that comprises 25,147 complex questions, answers, and human-generated rationales across various domains, such as brainteasers, puzzles, riddles, parajumbles, and critical reasoning tasks. A unique aspect of our dataset is the inclusion of 10,000 unannotated questions, enabling us to explore utilizing fewer supersized data to boost LLMs' inference capabilities. Our experiments underscore the significance of textsc{PuzzleBen}, as well as the effectiveness of our methodology as a promising direction in future endeavors. Our dataset and code will be published soon on texttt{Anonymity Link}.
5/8/2024
💬
A Zero-shot and Few-shot Study of Instruction-Finetuned Large Language Models Applied to Clinical and Biomedical Tasks
Yanis Labrak, Mickael Rouvier, Richard Dufour
0
0
We evaluate four state-of-the-art instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) -- ChatGPT, Flan-T5 UL2, Tk-Instruct, and Alpaca -- on a set of 13 real-world clinical and biomedical natural language processing (NLP) tasks in English, such as named-entity recognition (NER), question-answering (QA), relation extraction (RE), etc. Our overall results demonstrate that the evaluated LLMs begin to approach performance of state-of-the-art models in zero- and few-shot scenarios for most tasks, and particularly well for the QA task, even though they have never seen examples from these tasks before. However, we observed that the classification and RE tasks perform below what can be achieved with a specifically trained model for the medical field, such as PubMedBERT. Finally, we noted that no LLM outperforms all the others on all the studied tasks, with some models being better suited for certain tasks than others.
6/11/2024
🤯
D-NLP at SemEval-2024 Task 2: Evaluating Clinical Inference Capabilities of Large Language Models
Duygu Altinok
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant attention and widespread usage due to their impressive performance in various tasks. However, they are not without their own set of challenges, including issues such as hallucinations, factual inconsistencies, and limitations in numerical-quantitative reasoning. Evaluating LLMs in miscellaneous reasoning tasks remains an active area of research. Prior to the breakthrough of LLMs, Transformers had already proven successful in the medical domain, effectively employed for various natural language understanding (NLU) tasks. Following this trend, LLMs have also been trained and utilized in the medical domain, raising concerns regarding factual accuracy, adherence to safety protocols, and inherent limitations. In this paper, we focus on evaluating the natural language inference capabilities of popular open-source and closed-source LLMs using clinical trial reports as the dataset. We present the performance results of each LLM and further analyze their performance on a development set, particularly focusing on challenging instances that involve medical abbreviations and require numerical-quantitative reasoning. Gemini, our leading LLM, achieved a test set F1-score of 0.748, securing the ninth position on the task scoreboard. Our work is the first of its kind, offering a thorough examination of the inference capabilities of LLMs within the medical domain.
5/8/2024