LIA: Privacy-Preserving Data Quality Evaluation in Federated Learning Using a Lazy Influence Approximation

Overview

• Federated Learning is a technique for training AI models on decentralized data without directly sharing that data.
• However, the data used in Federated Learning can be low-quality, corrupted, or even malicious, which can harm the model's performance.
• Traditional data valuation methods don't work well in Federated Learning due to privacy concerns.
• This paper proposes a new approach called "lazy influence" to filter and score data while preserving privacy.

Plain English Explanation

In Federated Learning, each participant trains an AI model on their own data, and then shares the model updates with a central coordinator, rather than sharing the raw data. This allows the model to be trained without exposing the private data.

However, the data used in Federated Learning can be of low quality, corrupted, or even intentionally malicious. This can negatively impact the performance of the final model. Traditional methods for evaluating the quality or "value" of data aren't a good fit for Federated Learning, because they often require direct access to the data, which would violate privacy.

To address this, the researchers propose a new technique called "lazy influence" that allows participants to estimate the influence of each other's data without actually sharing the data itself. Each participant uses their own data to estimate how much influence another participant's data would have on the model, and sends an obfuscated, differentially private score to the central coordinator. This allows the coordinator to identify and filter out low-quality or malicious data, while still preserving the privacy of the participants.

The researchers show that this approach is effective at detecting biased and corrupted data, with a recall rate of over 90% and sometimes up to 100%, while also maintaining strong privacy guarantees.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this paper is the use of "lazy influence" to evaluate data quality in a privacy-preserving way. Lazy influence is a novel technique for approximating the influence that a participant's data has on the final model, without needing to access the raw data itself.

Here's how it works:

1. Each participant trains a local model on their own data.
2. They then use their local model to estimate the influence that another participant's data batch would have on the final model.
3. They send this influence score to the central coordinator, but in a differentially private way to protect the privacy of their own data.
4. The coordinator can then use these influence scores to identify and filter out low-quality or malicious data, without ever seeing the raw data.

The researchers evaluate this approach in both simulated and real-world settings, and show that it is effective at detecting biased and corrupted data, with very high recall rates. Importantly, they also demonstrate that this can be done while maintaining strong differential privacy guarantees, with an epsilon value less than or equal to 1.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge a few limitations of their approach. First, it relies on the assumption that participants are willing to share their influence scores with the coordinator. If some participants decide to withhold this information, it could reduce the effectiveness of the data filtering.

Additionally, the paper does not address how this approach would scale to very large federated learning systems with thousands or millions of participants. The computational and communication overhead required to estimate and share influence scores for each participant's data could become prohibitive at that scale.

Finally, the paper focuses primarily on detecting low-quality or corrupted data, but does not explore how this approach could be used to incentivize participants to contribute high-quality data. Incorporating data valuation into the federated learning process could be an interesting area for future research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel, privacy-preserving approach for evaluating data quality in Federated Learning. By using "lazy influence" to approximate the impact of each participant's data, the researchers have developed a way to filter out low-quality and malicious data while still protecting the privacy of the underlying data.

The results show that this method can achieve very high recall rates in detecting biased and corrupted data, all while maintaining strong differential privacy guarantees. This is an important step forward in making Federated Learning more robust and reliable, which could have significant implications for a wide range of real-world applications.

As Federated Learning continues to gain traction, techniques like this one will be crucial for ensuring the integrity and security of the data used to train these distributed AI models.