Lifelong Reinforcement Learning via Neuromodulation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a framework for lifelong reinforcement learning (RL) using neuromodulation mechanisms.
- It aims to address the challenge of continual learning in RL agents, where they can learn and retain knowledge over an extended period.
- The approach is inspired by the neuromodulatory systems in the brain that dynamically regulate synaptic plasticity and neuronal excitability.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new way to help artificial intelligence (AI) systems continuously learn and adapt over time, similar to how the human brain operates. Current AI systems often struggle to learn new tasks without forgetting what they've learned before. This is a problem known as "catastrophic forgetting."
The researchers propose taking inspiration from the brain's neuromodulatory systems, which use chemical signals to dynamically adjust how neurons connect and change over time. By incorporating similar neuromodulation mechanisms into AI systems, the researchers aim to enable these systems to continually learn and adapt to new situations without losing their previous knowledge and skills.
The key idea is to have the AI system's "brain" be able to selectively strengthen or weaken the connections between its simulated neurons, similar to how the human brain is constantly rewiring itself. This would allow the AI to learn new tasks while maintaining its existing capabilities, overcoming the bottleneck of traditional approaches that struggle with continual learning.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a reinforcement learning (RL) framework that incorporates neuromodulatory mechanisms to enable lifelong, continual learning. The key components of the framework include:
-
Neuromodulatory Actor-Critic: The agent has two main components - an actor that selects actions, and a critic that evaluates the quality of those actions. The neuromodulatory mechanism dynamically adjusts the plasticity and excitability of the actor and critic networks, allowing them to learn and adapt over time.
-
Neuromodulatory Signals: The system generates neuromodulatory signals that influence synaptic plasticity and neuronal excitability. These signals are based on factors such as reward prediction error, task novelty, and uncertainty.
-
Memory Consolidation: The framework includes a memory consolidation process that selectively retains and strengthens important knowledge and skills over time, preventing catastrophic forgetting.
The paper presents experiments in various RL environments to demonstrate the framework's ability to learn new tasks continuously while retaining previously acquired knowledge and skills. The results show improved performance and reduced forgetting compared to traditional RL approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to the challenge of continual learning in RL agents. By taking inspiration from the brain's neuromodulatory mechanisms, the authors have developed a framework that can dynamically adjust the agent's learning and memory processes to enable lifelong learning.
One potential limitation is the complexity of the proposed system, which may make it challenging to scale or apply to more complex real-world scenarios. Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational and memory requirements of the framework, which could be an important practical consideration.
It would also be valuable to see the framework evaluated on a wider range of tasks and environments to better understand its generalization capabilities and limitations. Comparisons to other state-of-the-art continual learning approaches could also provide valuable insights.
Overall, the paper represents an exciting step forward in the field of continual learning and highlights the potential for biologically-inspired mechanisms to enhance the adaptability and robustness of artificial intelligence systems.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a reinforcement learning framework that incorporates neuromodulatory mechanisms to enable lifelong, continual learning. By taking inspiration from the brain's dynamic regulation of synaptic plasticity and neuronal excitability, the researchers have developed a system that can learn new tasks while retaining previously acquired knowledge and skills.
The results demonstrate the potential of this approach to overcome the challenge of catastrophic forgetting that plagues many traditional RL agents. While the system is complex and may have practical limitations, it represents an important step towards building AI systems that can learn and adapt in a more human-like manner, with broad implications for the field of artificial intelligence and its real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Lifelong Reinforcement Learning via Neuromodulation
Sebastian Lee, Samuel Liebana Garcia, Claudia Clopath, Will Dabney
Navigating multiple tasks$unicode{x2014}$for instance in succession as in continual or lifelong learning, or in distributions as in meta or multi-task learning$unicode{x2014}$requires some notion of adaptation. Evolution over timescales of millennia has imbued humans and other animals with highly effective adaptive learning and decision-making strategies. Central to these functions are so-called neuromodulatory systems. In this work we introduce an abstract framework for integrating theories and evidence from neuroscience and the cognitive sciences into the design of adaptive artificial reinforcement learning algorithms. We give a concrete instance of this framework built on literature surrounding the neuromodulators Acetylcholine (ACh) and Noradrenaline (NA), and empirically validate the effectiveness of the resulting adaptive algorithm in a non-stationary multi-armed bandit problem. We conclude with a theory-based experiment proposal providing an avenue to link our framework back to efforts in experimental neuroscience.
Read more8/19/2024
🏅
0
An introduction to reinforcement learning for neuroscience
Kristopher T. Jensen
Reinforcement learning has a rich history in neuroscience, from early work on dopamine as a reward prediction error signal for temporal difference learning (Schultz et al., 1997) to recent work suggesting that dopamine could implement a form of 'distributional reinforcement learning' popularized in deep learning (Dabney et al., 2020). Throughout this literature, there has been a tight link between theoretical advances in reinforcement learning and neuroscientific experiments and findings. As a result, the theories describing our experimental data have become increasingly complex and difficult to navigate. In this review, we cover the basic theory underlying classical work in reinforcement learning and build up to an introductory overview of methods in modern deep reinforcement learning that have found applications in systems neuroscience. We start with an overview of the reinforcement learning problem and classical temporal difference algorithms, followed by a discussion of 'model-free' and 'model-based' reinforcement learning together with methods such as DYNA and successor representations that fall in between these two extremes. Throughout these sections, we highlight the close parallels between such machine learning methods and related work in both experimental and theoretical neuroscience. We then provide an introduction to deep reinforcement learning with examples of how these methods have been used to model different learning phenomena in systems neuroscience, such as meta-reinforcement learning (Wang et al., 2018) and distributional reinforcement learning (Dabney et al., 2020). Code that implements the methods discussed in this work and generates the figures is also provided.
Read more8/2/2024
0
Synergistic pathways of modulation enable robust task packing within neural dynamics
Giacomo Vedovati, ShiNung Ching
Understanding how brain networks learn and manage multiple tasks simultaneously is of interest in both neuroscience and artificial intelligence. In this regard, a recent research thread in theoretical neuroscience has focused on how recurrent neural network models and their internal dynamics enact multi-task learning. To manage different tasks requires a mechanism to convey information about task identity or context into the model, which from a biological perspective may involve mechanisms of neuromodulation. In this study, we use recurrent network models to probe the distinctions between two forms of contextual modulation of neural dynamics, at the level of neuronal excitability and at the level of synaptic strength. We characterize these mechanisms in terms of their functional outcomes, focusing on their robustness to context ambiguity and, relatedly, their efficiency with respect to packing multiple tasks into finite size networks. We also demonstrate distinction between these mechanisms at the level of the neuronal dynamics they induce. Together, these characterizations indicate complementarity and synergy in how these mechanisms act, potentially over multiple time-scales, toward enhancing robustness of multi-task learning.
Read more8/6/2024
🧠
0
Breaching the Bottleneck: Evolutionary Transition from Reward-Driven Learning to Reward-Agnostic Domain-Adapted Learning in Neuromodulated Neural Nets
Solvi Arnold, Reiji Suzuki, Takaya Arita, Kimitoshi Yamazaki
Advanced biological intelligence learns efficiently from an information-rich stream of stimulus information, even when feedback on behaviour quality is sparse or absent. Such learning exploits implicit assumptions about task domains. We refer to such learning as Domain-Adapted Learning (DAL). In contrast, AI learning algorithms rely on explicit externally provided measures of behaviour quality to acquire fit behaviour. This imposes an information bottleneck that precludes learning from diverse non-reward stimulus information, limiting learning efficiency. We consider the question of how biological evolution circumvents this bottleneck to produce DAL. We propose that species first evolve the ability to learn from reward signals, providing inefficient (bottlenecked) but broad adaptivity. From there, integration of non-reward information into the learning process can proceed via gradual accumulation of biases induced by such information on specific task domains. This scenario provides a biologically plausible pathway towards bottleneck-free, domain-adapted learning. Focusing on the second phase of this scenario, we set up a population of NNs with reward-driven learning modelled as Reinforcement Learning (A2C), and allow evolution to improve learning efficiency by integrating non-reward information into the learning process using a neuromodulatory update mechanism. On a navigation task in continuous 2D space, evolved DAL agents show a 300-fold increase in learning speed compared to pure RL agents. Evolution is found to eliminate reliance on reward information altogether, allowing DAL agents to learn from non-reward information exclusively, using local neuromodulation-based connection weight updates only. Code available at github.com/aislab/dal.
Read more8/6/2024