An introduction to reinforcement learning for neuroscience

Read original: arXiv:2311.07315 - Published 8/2/2024 by Kristopher T. Jensen
Total Score

0

🏅

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Reinforcement learning has a long history in neuroscience, from early work on dopamine as a reward prediction error signal to recent advancements in deep reinforcement learning.
  • There is a tight link between theoretical developments in reinforcement learning and neuroscientific findings.
  • The theories describing experimental data have become increasingly complex and difficult to navigate.
  • This review covers the basic theory of classical reinforcement learning and introduces modern deep reinforcement learning methods with applications in systems neuroscience.

Plain English Explanation

Reinforcement learning is a type of machine learning where an agent learns to take actions in an environment to maximize a reward. Neuroscientists have long been interested in reinforcement learning because it can help explain how the brain processes rewards and learns from experience.

The early work in this field focused on the role of dopamine, a neurotransmitter in the brain, in signaling reward prediction errors - the difference between expected and actual rewards. This formed the basis of a reinforcement learning technique called temporal difference learning.

Over time, the theories and models in reinforcement learning have become more sophisticated, often drawing inspiration from the latest developments in machine learning, particularly the rise of deep learning. Deep reinforcement learning combines deep neural networks with reinforcement learning algorithms, allowing agents to learn complex behaviors by interacting with their environment.

This review paper provides an introduction to these modern deep reinforcement learning methods and how they have been applied to study various learning phenomena in the brain, such as meta-reinforcement learning (where an agent learns to learn) and distributional reinforcement learning (where the agent learns the full distribution of possible rewards, not just the expected value).

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by providing an overview of the classical reinforcement learning problem and the core algorithms, such as temporal difference learning. It then discusses the distinction between "model-free" and "model-based" reinforcement learning, where the former learns directly from experience, and the latter learns an internal model of the environment.

The review also covers intermediate methods, such as DYNA and successor representations, that combine elements of both model-free and model-based approaches.

Throughout these sections, the authors highlight the close parallels between the machine learning methods and related work in experimental and theoretical neuroscience.

The paper then provides an introduction to deep reinforcement learning, explaining how these modern techniques have been used to model various learning phenomena in systems neuroscience, such as meta-reinforcement learning and distributional reinforcement learning.

The authors also provide code and figures to illustrate the methods discussed in the paper.

Critical Analysis

The paper does a commendable job of covering a wide range of topics in a relatively concise manner, making it a valuable resource for those interested in the intersection of reinforcement learning and neuroscience.

However, as the authors acknowledge, the theories and models described have become increasingly complex, which can be a challenge for readers unfamiliar with the field. The paper could have benefited from more in-depth explanations or examples to help the reader fully grasp the nuances of the various approaches.

Additionally, while the paper touches on some potential applications of these methods in neuroscience, it does not delve deeply into the specific insights or implications of the research. Further discussion on how these techniques can advance our understanding of the brain and inform neuroscientific research would have been a valuable addition.

Conclusion

This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of reinforcement learning from its early foundations in neuroscience to the modern deep reinforcement learning techniques that are now being applied to study various learning phenomena in the brain.

By highlighting the tight coupling between theoretical advances in machine learning and neuroscientific findings, the paper underscores the importance of cross-pollination between these fields. As reinforcement learning continues to grow in sophistication, it will likely play an increasingly crucial role in advancing our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying learning and decision-making.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏅

Total Score

0

An introduction to reinforcement learning for neuroscience

Kristopher T. Jensen

Reinforcement learning has a rich history in neuroscience, from early work on dopamine as a reward prediction error signal for temporal difference learning (Schultz et al., 1997) to recent work suggesting that dopamine could implement a form of 'distributional reinforcement learning' popularized in deep learning (Dabney et al., 2020). Throughout this literature, there has been a tight link between theoretical advances in reinforcement learning and neuroscientific experiments and findings. As a result, the theories describing our experimental data have become increasingly complex and difficult to navigate. In this review, we cover the basic theory underlying classical work in reinforcement learning and build up to an introductory overview of methods in modern deep reinforcement learning that have found applications in systems neuroscience. We start with an overview of the reinforcement learning problem and classical temporal difference algorithms, followed by a discussion of 'model-free' and 'model-based' reinforcement learning together with methods such as DYNA and successor representations that fall in between these two extremes. Throughout these sections, we highlight the close parallels between such machine learning methods and related work in both experimental and theoretical neuroscience. We then provide an introduction to deep reinforcement learning with examples of how these methods have been used to model different learning phenomena in systems neuroscience, such as meta-reinforcement learning (Wang et al., 2018) and distributional reinforcement learning (Dabney et al., 2020). Code that implements the methods discussed in this work and generates the figures is also provided.

Read more

8/2/2024

Lifelong Reinforcement Learning via Neuromodulation
Total Score

0

Lifelong Reinforcement Learning via Neuromodulation

Sebastian Lee, Samuel Liebana Garcia, Claudia Clopath, Will Dabney

Navigating multiple tasks$unicode{x2014}$for instance in succession as in continual or lifelong learning, or in distributions as in meta or multi-task learning$unicode{x2014}$requires some notion of adaptation. Evolution over timescales of millennia has imbued humans and other animals with highly effective adaptive learning and decision-making strategies. Central to these functions are so-called neuromodulatory systems. In this work we introduce an abstract framework for integrating theories and evidence from neuroscience and the cognitive sciences into the design of adaptive artificial reinforcement learning algorithms. We give a concrete instance of this framework built on literature surrounding the neuromodulators Acetylcholine (ACh) and Noradrenaline (NA), and empirically validate the effectiveness of the resulting adaptive algorithm in a non-stationary multi-armed bandit problem. We conclude with a theory-based experiment proposal providing an avenue to link our framework back to efforts in experimental neuroscience.

Read more

8/19/2024

Deep Dive into Model-free Reinforcement Learning for Biological and Robotic Systems: Theory and Practice
Total Score

0

Deep Dive into Model-free Reinforcement Learning for Biological and Robotic Systems: Theory and Practice

Yusheng Jiao, Feng Ling, Sina Heydari, Nicolas Heess, Josh Merel, Eva Kanso

Animals and robots exist in a physical world and must coordinate their bodies to achieve behavioral objectives. With recent developments in deep reinforcement learning, it is now possible for scientists and engineers to obtain sensorimotor strategies (policies) for specific tasks using physically simulated bodies and environments. However, the utility of these methods goes beyond the constraints of a specific task; they offer an exciting framework for understanding the organization of an animal sensorimotor system in connection to its morphology and physical interaction with the environment, as well as for deriving general design rules for sensing and actuation in robotic systems. Algorithms and code implementing both learning agents and environments are increasingly available, but the basic assumptions and choices that go into the formulation of an embodied feedback control problem using deep reinforcement learning may not be immediately apparent. Here, we present a concise exposition of the mathematical and algorithmic aspects of model-free reinforcement learning, specifically through the use of textit{actor-critic} methods, as a tool for investigating the feedback control underlying animal and robotic behavior.

Read more

5/21/2024

Structure in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey and Open Problems
Total Score

0

Structure in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey and Open Problems

Aditya Mohan, Amy Zhang, Marius Lindauer

Reinforcement Learning (RL), bolstered by the expressive capabilities of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) for function approximation, has demonstrated considerable success in numerous applications. However, its practicality in addressing various real-world scenarios, characterized by diverse and unpredictable dynamics, noisy signals, and large state and action spaces, remains limited. This limitation stems from poor data efficiency, limited generalization capabilities, a lack of safety guarantees, and the absence of interpretability, among other factors. To overcome these challenges and improve performance across these crucial metrics, one promising avenue is to incorporate additional structural information about the problem into the RL learning process. Various sub-fields of RL have proposed methods for incorporating such inductive biases. We amalgamate these diverse methodologies under a unified framework, shedding light on the role of structure in the learning problem, and classify these methods into distinct patterns of incorporating structure. By leveraging this comprehensive framework, we provide valuable insights into the challenges of structured RL and lay the groundwork for a design pattern perspective on RL research. This novel perspective paves the way for future advancements and aids in developing more effective and efficient RL algorithms that can potentially handle real-world scenarios better.

Read more

4/26/2024