Uncertainty for Active Learning on Graphs
2405.01462
0
0
💬
Abstract
Uncertainty Sampling is an Active Learning strategy that aims to improve the data efficiency of machine learning models by iteratively acquiring labels of data points with the highest uncertainty. While it has proven effective for independent data its applicability to graphs remains under-explored. We propose the first extensive study of Uncertainty Sampling for node classification: (1) We benchmark Uncertainty Sampling beyond predictive uncertainty and highlight a significant performance gap to other Active Learning strategies. (2) We develop ground-truth Bayesian uncertainty estimates in terms of the data generating process and prove their effectiveness in guiding Uncertainty Sampling toward optimal queries. We confirm our results on synthetic data and design an approximate approach that consistently outperforms other uncertainty estimators on real datasets. (3) Based on this analysis, we relate pitfalls in modeling uncertainty to existing methods. Our analysis enables and informs the development of principled uncertainty estimation on graphs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of Uncertainty Sampling, an Active Learning strategy, for improving the data efficiency of machine learning models on graph-structured data.
- The authors benchmark Uncertainty Sampling and highlight a significant performance gap to other Active Learning strategies for node classification.
- They develop ground-truth Bayesian uncertainty estimates based on the data generating process and show their effectiveness in guiding Uncertainty Sampling.
- The authors relate pitfalls in modeling uncertainty to existing methods and provide insights to inform the development of principled uncertainty estimation on graphs.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models often require a lot of labeled data to perform well. Uncertainty Sampling is a technique that aims to improve the data efficiency of these models by selectively acquiring labels for the most "uncertain" data points. This means the model will focus on learning from the data points it is least confident about, rather than randomly selecting data to label.
The authors of this paper investigated how well Uncertainty Sampling works for machine learning models that operate on graph-structured data, such as social networks or citation networks. They found that while Uncertainty Sampling is effective for independent data, it has some limitations when applied to graphs.
The researchers developed a new way to estimate the uncertainty of the model on graph data, based on a Bayesian approach that considers the underlying data generation process. This "ground-truth" uncertainty estimate was shown to be more effective at guiding the Uncertainty Sampling process compared to other methods.
By analyzing the challenges in modeling uncertainty on graphs, the authors provide insights that can help improve the development of machine learning techniques for graph-structured data. This is an important area of research, as many real-world datasets have a natural graph-like structure, and being able to effectively learn from this type of data can have significant applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an extensive study of Uncertainty Sampling, a popular Active Learning strategy, for the task of node classification on graph-structured data. The authors make several key contributions:
-
Benchmarking Uncertainty Sampling: The researchers benchmark Uncertainty Sampling beyond just predictive uncertainty and highlight a significant performance gap to other Active Learning strategies for node classification.
-
Ground-truth Bayesian Uncertainty Estimates: The authors develop ground-truth Bayesian uncertainty estimates in terms of the data generating process and prove their effectiveness in guiding Uncertainty Sampling toward optimal queries. They confirm these results on synthetic data and design an approximate approach that consistently outperforms other uncertainty estimators on real datasets.
-
Insights on Uncertainty Modeling: Based on their analysis, the authors relate pitfalls in modeling uncertainty to existing methods. This enables and informs the development of principled uncertainty estimation on graphs, as highlighted in other related research.
The paper's experimental evaluation covers both synthetic and real-world graph datasets, demonstrating the practical relevance of the proposed techniques. The authors' insights on the challenges of uncertainty modeling for graph-structured data can help guide the development of more effective Active Learning and uncertainty quantification methods for graph learning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous investigation of Uncertainty Sampling for node classification on graphs. The authors' development of ground-truth Bayesian uncertainty estimates is a particularly notable contribution, as it addresses a key limitation of existing uncertainty estimation methods for graph-structured data.
However, the paper does acknowledge some caveats and areas for further research. For example, the proposed Bayesian uncertainty estimation approach may be computationally expensive for large-scale graphs, and the authors suggest exploring approximate methods to address this. Additionally, the paper focuses on node classification, and it would be interesting to see how the insights and techniques extend to other graph learning tasks, such as link prediction or graph classification.
Another potential area for further exploration is the interplay between uncertainty estimation and other graph representation learning techniques, such as graph neural networks or graph embeddings. Combining principled uncertainty quantification with these powerful graph learning methods could lead to even more effective and data-efficient machine learning models for graph-structured data.
Conclusion
This paper presents a significant contribution to the understanding and advancement of Active Learning techniques for graph-structured data. By benchmarking Uncertainty Sampling and developing ground-truth Bayesian uncertainty estimates, the authors have provided valuable insights that can inform the development of more effective and data-efficient machine learning models for a wide range of graph-based applications.
The paper's findings highlight the importance of considering the unique characteristics of graph data when designing uncertainty estimation and Active Learning strategies. The authors' insights can serve as a foundation for future research in this area, ultimately leading to more robust and practical machine learning solutions for real-world problems with graph-structured data.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Evidential uncertainty sampling for active learning
Arthur Hoarau, Vincent Lemaire, Arnaud Martin, Jean-Christophe Dubois, Yolande Le Gall
0
0
Recent studies in active learning, particularly in uncertainty sampling, have focused on the decomposition of model uncertainty into reducible and irreducible uncertainties. In this paper, the aim is to simplify the computational process while eliminating the dependence on observations. Crucially, the inherent uncertainty in the labels is considered, the uncertainty of the oracles. Two strategies are proposed, sampling by Klir uncertainty, which tackles the exploration-exploitation dilemma, and sampling by evidential epistemic uncertainty, which extends the concept of reducible uncertainty within the evidential framework, both using the theory of belief functions. Experimental results in active learning demonstrate that our proposed method can outperform uncertainty sampling.
5/28/2024
Graph Mining under Data scarcity
Appan Rakaraddi, Lam Siew-Kei, Mahardhika Pratama, Marcus de Carvalho
0
0
Multitude of deep learning models have been proposed for node classification in graphs. However, they tend to perform poorly under labeled-data scarcity. Although Few-shot learning for graphs has been introduced to overcome this problem, the existing models are not easily adaptable for generic graph learning frameworks like Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). Our work proposes an Uncertainty Estimator framework that can be applied on top of any generic GNN backbone network (which are typically designed for supervised/semi-supervised node classification) to improve the node classification performance. A neural network is used to model the Uncertainty Estimator as a probability distribution rather than probabilistic discrete scalar values. We train these models under the classic episodic learning paradigm in the $n$-way, $k$-shot fashion, in an end-to-end setting. Our work demonstrates that implementation of the uncertainty estimator on a GNN backbone network improves the classification accuracy under Few-shot setting without any meta-learning specific architecture. We conduct experiments on multiple datasets under different Few-shot settings and different GNN-based backbone networks. Our method outperforms the baselines, which demonstrates the efficacy of the Uncertainty Estimator for Few-shot node classification on graphs with a GNN.
6/12/2024
🎯
Uncertainty Quantification on Graph Learning: A Survey
Chao Chen, Chenghua Guo, Rui Xu, Xiangwen Liao, Xi Zhang, Sihong Xie, Hui Xiong, Philip Yu
0
0
Graphical models, including Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGMs), have demonstrated their exceptional capabilities across numerous fields. These models necessitate effective uncertainty quantification to ensure reliable decision-making amid the challenges posed by model training discrepancies and unpredictable testing scenarios. This survey examines recent works that address uncertainty quantification within the model architectures, training, and inference of GNNs and PGMs. We aim to provide an overview of the current landscape of uncertainty in graphical models by organizing the recent methods into uncertainty representation and handling. By summarizing state-of-the-art methods, this survey seeks to deepen the understanding of uncertainty quantification in graphical models, thereby increasing their effectiveness and safety in critical applications.
4/24/2024
🧠
Linear Opinion Pooling for Uncertainty Quantification on Graphs
Clemens Damke, Eyke Hullermeier
0
0
We address the problem of uncertainty quantification for graph-structured data, or, more specifically, the problem to quantify the predictive uncertainty in (semi-supervised) node classification. Key questions in this regard concern the distinction between two different types of uncertainty, aleatoric and epistemic, and how to support uncertainty quantification by leveraging the structural information provided by the graph topology. Challenging assumptions and postulates of state-of-the-art methods, we propose a novel approach that represents (epistemic) uncertainty in terms of mixtures of Dirichlet distributions and refers to the established principle of linear opinion pooling for propagating information between neighbored nodes in the graph. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated in a series of experiments on a variety of graph-structured datasets.
6/7/2024