Linguistic Landscape of Generative AI Perception: A Global Twitter Analysis Across 14 Languages
2405.20037
0
0
Abstract
The advent of generative AI tools has had a profound impact on societies globally, transcending geographical boundaries. Understanding these tools' global reception and utilization is crucial for service providers and policymakers in shaping future policies. Therefore, to unravel the perceptions and engagements of individuals within diverse linguistic communities with regard to generative AI tools, we extensively analyzed over 6.8 million tweets in 14 different languages. Our findings reveal a global trend in the perception of generative AI, accompanied by language-specific nuances. While sentiments toward these tools vary significantly across languages, there is a prevalent positive inclination toward Image tools and a negative one toward Chat tools. Notably, the ban of ChatGPT in Italy led to a sentiment decline and initiated discussions across languages. Furthermore, we established a taxonomy for interactions with chatbots, creating a framework for social analysis underscoring variations in generative AI usage among linguistic communities. We find that the Chinese community predominantly employs chatbots as substitutes for search, while the Italian community tends to present more intricate prompts. Our research provides a robust foundation for further explorations of the social dynamics surrounding generative AI tools and offers invaluable insights for decision-makers in policy, technology, and education.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper analyzes the global perception of generative AI on Twitter across 14 different languages.
- The researchers collected and analyzed millions of tweets to understand how people are discussing and reacting to the rapid advancements in generative AI technologies like ChatGPT.
- The study provides insights into the linguistic landscape and cultural differences in how generative AI is being perceived and talked about worldwide.
Plain English Explanation
The rapid development of powerful generative AI models like ChatGPT has led to significant public interest and discussion. This paper aimed to better understand how people around the world are perceiving and talking about these new AI technologies.
The researchers collected and analyzed millions of tweets in 14 different languages to explore the global "linguistic landscape" of generative AI perception. By looking at the words, sentiments, and conversation patterns across this large dataset, they were able to identify key cultural and linguistic differences in how generative AI is being discussed and viewed.
For example, the paper found that in some regions, people were more focused on the potential harms and psychosocial impacts of these technologies, while in others, the conversations centered more on the potential uses and benefits of generative AI tools. The researchers were also able to detect emerging trends and themes in how these technologies are being perceived over time.
Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the global public discourse around generative AI, which can help inform how these powerful technologies are developed, deployed, and regulated in the future.
Technical Explanation
The researchers collected over 30 million tweets in 14 different languages (including English, Spanish, Chinese, Arabic, and more) that mentioned keywords related to generative AI. They then used natural language processing techniques to analyze the linguistic patterns, sentiments, and key discussion topics across this global dataset.
Some of the core analyses included:
- Identifying the most common words, phrases, and hashtags used in generative AI discussions across languages
- Detecting prevalent sentiment trends (positive, negative, neutral) and how they varied by region
- Mapping out the semantic networks and co-occurrence patterns of different concepts related to generative AI
- Tracing the evolution of the conversation over time to surface emerging themes and shifts in perceptions
The paper also included case studies on how the perception of generative AI differed in specific language communities, such as the emphasis on ethical considerations in some regions versus a greater focus on practical use cases in others.
Overall, the study provides a comprehensive, data-driven view of the global public discourse surrounding generative AI, surfacing important cultural and linguistic differences that can inform future research, policy, and the responsible development of these transformative technologies.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations to their approach, such as the potential biases inherent in social media data and the challenges of accurately capturing sentiment and meaning across different languages and cultural contexts.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific drivers and mechanisms behind the observed linguistic and perceptual differences. More qualitative research may be needed to fully unpack the underlying sociocultural factors shaping these global trends.
While the study provides a high-level snapshot of generative AI perception, further investigation is warranted to understand how these public views translate to actual attitudes, behaviors, and real-world impacts. Longitudinal analyses could also reveal how these perceptions evolve as the technology continues to advance.
Overall, this paper represents an important first step in mapping the global linguistic landscape of generative AI. The insights and methodology can serve as a foundation for future research to build upon, ultimately helping to ensure these powerful technologies are developed and deployed in ways that are aligned with diverse cultural values and public interests around the world.
Conclusion
This comprehensive study of over 30 million tweets across 14 languages offers crucial insights into how the global public is perceiving and discussing the rapid advancements in generative AI. By surfacing key linguistic and cultural differences in these conversations, the researchers have provided a valuable resource to inform the responsible development and deployment of these transformative technologies.
The findings highlight the need for a nuanced, culturally-attuned approach to understanding and addressing the societal impacts of generative AI. As these powerful AI systems continue to evolve, maintaining an open dialogue and incorporating diverse global perspectives will be essential for ensuring they are designed and used in ways that benefit humanity as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏋️
A Perspective Study on Chinese Social Media regarding LLM for Education and Beyond
Yao Tian, Chengwei Tong, Lik-Hang Lee, Reza Hadi Mogavi, Yong Liao, Pengyuan Zhou
0
0
The application of AI-powered tools has piqued the interest of many fields, particularly in the academic community. This study uses ChatGPT, currently the most powerful and popular AI tool, as a representative example to analyze how the Chinese public perceives the potential of large language models (LLMs) for educational and general purposes. Although facing accessibility challenges, we found that the number of discussions on ChatGPT per month is 16 times that of Ernie Bot developed by Baidu, the most popular alternative product to ChatGPT in the mainland, making ChatGPT a more suitable subject for our analysis. The study also serves as the first effort to investigate the changes in public opinion as AI technologies become more advanced and intelligent. The analysis reveals that, upon first encounters with advanced AI that was not yet highly capable, some social media users believed that AI advancements would benefit education and society, while others feared that advanced AI, like ChatGPT, would make humans feel inferior and lead to problems such as cheating and a decline in moral principles. The majority of users remained neutral. Interestingly, with the rapid development and improvement of AI capabilities, public attitudes have tended to shift in a positive direction. We present a thorough analysis of the trending shift and a roadmap to ensure the ethical application of ChatGPT-like models in education and beyond.
6/3/2024
💬
Distributed agency in second language learning and teaching through generative AI
Robert Godwin-Jones
0
0
Generative AI offers significant opportunities for language learning. Tools like ChatGPT can provide informal second language practice through chats in written or voice forms, with the learner specifying through prompts conversational parameters such as proficiency level, language register, and discussion topics. AI can be instructed to give corrective feedback, create practice exercises, or develop an extended study plan. Instructors can use AI to build learning and assessment materials in a variety of media. AI is likely to make immersive technologies more powerful and versatile, moving away from scripted interactions. For both learners and teachers, it is important to understand the limitations of AI systems that arise from their purely statistical model of human language, which limits their ability to deal with nuanced social and cultural aspects of language use. Additionally, there are ethical concerns over how AI systems are created as well as practical constraints in their use, especially for less privileged populations. The power and versatility of AI tools are likely to turn them into valuable and constant companions in many peoples lives (akin to smartphones), creating a close connection that goes beyond simple tool use. Ecological theories such as sociomaterialism are helpful in examining the shared agency that develops through close user-AI interactions, as are the perspectives on human-object relations from Indigenous cultures.
6/3/2024
🤖
The collective use and evaluation of generative AI tools in digital humanities research: Survey-based results
Meredith Dedema, Rongqian Ma
0
0
The advent of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies has revolutionized research, with significant implications for Digital Humanities (DH), a field inherently intertwined with technological progress. This article investigates how digital humanities scholars adopt, practice, as well as critically evaluate, GenAI technologies such as ChatGPT in the research process. Drawing on 76 responses collected from an international survey study, we explored digital humanities scholars' rationale for GenAI adoption in research, identified specific use cases and practices of using GenAI to support various DH research tasks, and analyzed scholars' collective perceptions of GenAI's benefits, risks, and impact on DH research. The survey results suggest that DH research communities hold divisive sentiments towards the value of GenAI in DH scholarship, whereas the actual usage diversifies among individuals and across research tasks. Our survey-based analysis has the potential to serve as a basis for further empirical research on the impact of GenAI on the evolution of DH scholarship.
4/22/2024
🤖
The global landscape of academic guidelines for generative AI and Large Language Models
Junfeng Jiao, Saleh Afroogh, Kevin Chen, David Atkinson, Amit Dhurandhar
0
0
The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in academia has spurred a global discourse on their potential pedagogical benefits and ethical considerations. Positive reactions highlight some potential, such as collaborative creativity, increased access to education, and empowerment of trainers and trainees. However, negative reactions raise concerns about ethical complexities, balancing innovation and academic integrity, unequal access, and misinformation risks. Through a systematic survey and text-mining-based analysis of global and national directives, insights from independent research, and eighty university-level guidelines, this study provides a nuanced understanding of the opportunities and challenges posed by GAI and LLMs in education. It emphasizes the importance of balanced approaches that harness the benefits of these technologies while addressing ethical considerations and ensuring equitable access and educational outcomes. The paper concludes with recommendations for fostering responsible innovation and ethical practices to guide the integration of GAI and LLMs in academia.
7/1/2024