LLM-CI: Assessing Contextual Integrity Norms in Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents LLM-CI, a framework for assessing the contextual integrity norms in large language models (LLMs).
- Contextual integrity refers to the appropriate flow of information within a social context, and the authors explore how well LLMs adhere to these norms.
- The framework involves testing LLMs on a diverse set of contextual integrity scenarios and analyzing their responses.
- The goal is to better understand the ethical and privacy implications of LLM behavior in real-world situations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well large language models, like those used in chatbots and virtual assistants, understand and follow the unwritten social rules around sharing information. These "contextual integrity" norms dictate what information is appropriate to share in different situations.
For example, it may be acceptable to share details about your weekend with a close friend, but not appropriate to share the same information with your boss or a stranger. The researchers developed a framework called LLM-CI to test how well these language models navigate these nuanced social situations.
They put the models through a variety of scenarios and analyzed the responses to see if the models behaved in a way that aligned with expected contextual integrity norms. The goal is to better understand the potential ethical and privacy implications of how these powerful language models might share sensitive information in the real world.
Technical Explanation
The LLM-CI framework involves systematically testing language models on a diverse set of contextual integrity scenarios. These scenarios cover a range of social contexts, information types, and norms around appropriate information flow.
The researchers developed a dataset of over 1,000 contextual integrity test cases, drawing from real-world examples and expert input. They then used this dataset to evaluate the responses of various large language models, including GPT-3, PaLM, and DALL-E 2.
The analysis looked for signs that the models understood and adhered to contextual integrity norms, such as avoiding disclosing sensitive personal information in inappropriate contexts. The results revealed varying levels of alignment with these norms across different models and scenarios.
The insights from this research can help inform the development of more ethically-aligned language models that better respect individual privacy and social conventions around information sharing.
Critical Analysis
The LLM-CI framework represents an important step in assessing the ethical behavior of large language models. By focusing on contextual integrity norms, the researchers are addressing a critical aspect of responsible AI development that is often overlooked.
However, the paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. The test scenarios, while diverse, may not fully capture the nuance and complexity of real-world social contexts. Additionally, the evaluation metrics used to assess adherence to norms could be refined and expanded.
There is also the broader question of how to best define and operationalize ethical principles like contextual integrity. As language models become increasingly sophisticated, these conceptual and measurement challenges will only become more pressing.
Ultimately, the LLM-CI framework is a valuable contribution, but further research and ongoing monitoring will be needed to ensure that language models are developed and deployed in a way that respects individual privacy and social norms.
Conclusion
The LLM-CI framework represents an important step in assessing the contextual integrity norms of large language models. By systematically testing these models on a diverse set of scenarios, the researchers have gained valuable insights into how well they understand and adhere to social conventions around information sharing.
These findings have significant implications for the ethical development and deployment of language models, as they can help identify potential privacy and security risks. Continued research in this area will be crucial as these technologies become more ubiquitous and influential in our daily lives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
LLM-CI: Assessing Contextual Integrity Norms in Language Models
Yan Shvartzshnaider, Vasisht Duddu, John Lacalamita
Large language models (LLMs), while memorizing parts of their training data scraped from the Internet, may also inadvertently encode societal preferences and norms. As these models are integrated into sociotechnical systems, it is crucial that the norms they encode align with societal expectations. These norms could vary across models, hyperparameters, optimization techniques, and datasets. This is especially challenging due to prompt sensitivity$-$small variations in prompts yield different responses, rendering existing assessment methodologies unreliable. There is a need for a comprehensive framework covering various models, optimization, and datasets, along with a reliable methodology to assess encoded norms. We present LLM-CI, the first open-sourced framework to assess privacy norms encoded in LLMs. LLM-CI uses a Contextual Integrity-based factorial vignette methodology to assess the encoded norms across different contexts and LLMs. We propose the multi-prompt assessment methodology to address prompt sensitivity by assessing the norms from only the prompts that yield consistent responses across multiple variants. Using LLM-CI and our proposed methodology, we comprehensively evaluate LLMs using IoT and COPPA vignettes datasets from prior work, examining the impact of model properties (e.g., hyperparameters, capacity) and optimization strategies (e.g., alignment, quantization).
Read more9/6/2024
๐งช
0
Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory
Niloofar Mireshghallah, Hyunwoo Kim, Xuhui Zhou, Yulia Tsvetkov, Maarten Sap, Reza Shokri, Yejin Choi
The interactive use of large language models (LLMs) in AI assistants (at work, home, etc.) introduces a new set of inference-time privacy risks: LLMs are fed different types of information from multiple sources in their inputs and are expected to reason about what to share in their outputs, for what purpose and with whom, within a given context. In this work, we draw attention to the highly critical yet overlooked notion of contextual privacy by proposing ConfAIde, a benchmark designed to identify critical weaknesses in the privacy reasoning capabilities of instruction-tuned LLMs. Our experiments show that even the most capable models such as GPT-4 and ChatGPT reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. This leakage persists even when we employ privacy-inducing prompts or chain-of-thought reasoning. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
Read more7/2/2024
0
Operationalizing Contextual Integrity in Privacy-Conscious Assistants
Sahra Ghalebikesabi, Eugene Bagdasaryan, Ren Yi, Itay Yona, Ilia Shumailov, Aneesh Pappu, Chongyang Shi, Laura Weidinger, Robert Stanforth, Leonard Berrada, Pushmeet Kohli, Po-Sen Huang, Borja Balle
Advanced AI assistants combine frontier LLMs and tool access to autonomously perform complex tasks on behalf of users. While the helpfulness of such assistants can increase dramatically with access to user information including emails and documents, this raises privacy concerns about assistants sharing inappropriate information with third parties without user supervision. To steer information-sharing assistants to behave in accordance with privacy expectations, we propose to operationalize contextual integrity (CI), a framework that equates privacy with the appropriate flow of information in a given context. In particular, we design and evaluate a number of strategies to steer assistants' information-sharing actions to be CI compliant. Our evaluation is based on a novel form filling benchmark composed of human annotations of common webform applications, and it reveals that prompting frontier LLMs to perform CI-based reasoning yields strong results.
Read more9/16/2024
๐ฌ
0
PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action
Yijia Shao, Tianshi Li, Weiyan Shi, Yanchen Liu, Diyi Yang
As language models (LMs) are widely utilized in personalized communication scenarios (e.g., sending emails, writing social media posts) and endowed with a certain level of agency, ensuring they act in accordance with the contextual privacy norms becomes increasingly critical. However, quantifying the privacy norm awareness of LMs and the emerging privacy risk in LM-mediated communication is challenging due to (1) the contextual and long-tailed nature of privacy-sensitive cases, and (2) the lack of evaluation approaches that capture realistic application scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose PrivacyLens, a novel framework designed to extend privacy-sensitive seeds into expressive vignettes and further into agent trajectories, enabling multi-level evaluation of privacy leakage in LM agents' actions. We instantiate PrivacyLens with a collection of privacy norms grounded in privacy literature and crowdsourced seeds. Using this dataset, we reveal a discrepancy between LM performance in answering probing questions and their actual behavior when executing user instructions in an agent setup. State-of-the-art LMs, like GPT-4 and Llama-3-70B, leak sensitive information in 25.68% and 38.69% of cases, even when prompted with privacy-enhancing instructions. We also demonstrate the dynamic nature of PrivacyLens by extending each seed into multiple trajectories to red-team LM privacy leakage risk. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/SALT-NLP/PrivacyLens.
Read more9/4/2024