Operationalizing Contextual Integrity in Privacy-Conscious Assistants
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how to incorporate the framework of contextual integrity into the design of privacy-conscious AI assistants.
- The authors propose a system to operationalize contextual integrity in order to help AI systems better understand and respect social norms around privacy.
- They describe an architecture for contextual integrity-aware AI assistants and discuss potential applications and implications.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about finding ways for AI assistants to be more respectful of people's privacy. It uses the idea of "contextual integrity" - the notion that information should only be shared in ways that are appropriate for the specific situation.
The researchers suggest building AI systems that can better understand the social norms and expectations around privacy in different contexts. For example, the information you might share with a close friend would be different than what you'd share with a stranger or a professional you're working with.
The goal is to create AI assistants that can adapt their behavior to respect these contextual differences, rather than just treating all information the same way. This could help the AI avoid privacy violations and build more trust with users.
The paper outlines a proposed architecture for how this kind of "contextual integrity-aware" AI assistant could work. It also discusses some potential real-world applications, like using this approach to build digital assistants that are more privacy-conscious.
Overall, the research aims to make AI systems more aligned with human values around privacy, so they can be useful tools without compromising people's personal information.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for operationalizing contextual integrity in the design of privacy-conscious AI assistants. Contextual integrity refers to the idea that information should only be shared in ways that are appropriate for the specific context.
The authors propose an architecture for contextual integrity-aware AI assistants that can understand and reason about the social norms and expectations around privacy in different situations. This includes components for:
- Context modeling: Representing the relevant contextual factors like the actors involved, the transmission principles, and the type of information.
- Norm reasoning: Inferring the applicable social norms and privacy expectations based on the context.
- Privacy-preserving behavior: Adapting the assistant's actions to respect the identified privacy norms, such as selectively disclosing information or deferring to the user's preferences.
The paper discusses how this architecture could be applied in scenarios like digital personal assistants, smart home devices, and language models. It also touches on potential challenges around accurately modeling contextual norms and ensuring the assistant's behavior remains aligned with user expectations.
Overall, the research aims to make progress on building AI systems that are more privacy-conscious and better aligned with human values around information sharing.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and well-reasoned approach for incorporating contextual integrity into the design of privacy-conscious AI assistants. The proposed architecture seems promising as a way to imbue AI systems with a deeper understanding of social norms and expectations around privacy.
One potential limitation is the challenge of accurately modeling contextual norms, which can be highly nuanced and context-dependent. The authors acknowledge this as an area requiring further research and validation. Ensuring the assistant's behavior remains aligned with user expectations as contexts evolve will also be an ongoing challenge.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the technical aspects of the proposed architecture, without delving deeply into potential societal implications or real-world deployment considerations. Further exploration of these factors could help strengthen the proposals and inform responsible development of such systems.
Overall, this research represents an important step towards creating AI assistants that are more attuned to human values around privacy. Continued work in this direction, addressing the identified challenges, could yield valuable insights for building more trustworthy and ethical AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper offers a framework for operationalizing contextual integrity in the design of privacy-conscious AI assistants. By modeling the relevant contextual factors and reasoning about applicable social norms, the proposed architecture aims to enable AI systems that are more aligned with human values around information sharing and privacy.
The research represents a meaningful contribution towards developing AI assistants that can adapt their behavior to respect the contextual appropriateness of disclosures, rather than treating all information the same way. This could help build greater trust and acceptance of AI technologies, as users have more confidence that their personal data will be handled responsibly.
While challenges around accurately modeling contextual norms and ensuring long-term alignment with user expectations remain, this work lays important groundwork for future developments in privacy-preserving AI. Continued advancements in this direction could have significant implications for the ethical and trustworthy deployment of AI systems in a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Operationalizing Contextual Integrity in Privacy-Conscious Assistants
Sahra Ghalebikesabi, Eugene Bagdasaryan, Ren Yi, Itay Yona, Ilia Shumailov, Aneesh Pappu, Chongyang Shi, Laura Weidinger, Robert Stanforth, Leonard Berrada, Pushmeet Kohli, Po-Sen Huang, Borja Balle
Advanced AI assistants combine frontier LLMs and tool access to autonomously perform complex tasks on behalf of users. While the helpfulness of such assistants can increase dramatically with access to user information including emails and documents, this raises privacy concerns about assistants sharing inappropriate information with third parties without user supervision. To steer information-sharing assistants to behave in accordance with privacy expectations, we propose to operationalize contextual integrity (CI), a framework that equates privacy with the appropriate flow of information in a given context. In particular, we design and evaluate a number of strategies to steer assistants' information-sharing actions to be CI compliant. Our evaluation is based on a novel form filling benchmark composed of human annotations of common webform applications, and it reveals that prompting frontier LLMs to perform CI-based reasoning yields strong results.
Read more9/16/2024
0
Privacy Checklist: Privacy Violation Detection Grounding on Contextual Integrity Theory
Haoran Li, Wei Fan, Yulin Chen, Jiayang Cheng, Tianshu Chu, Xuebing Zhou, Peizhao Hu, Yangqiu Song
Privacy research has attracted wide attention as individuals worry that their private data can be easily leaked during interactions with smart devices, social platforms, and AI applications. Computer science researchers, on the other hand, commonly study privacy issues through privacy attacks and defenses on segmented fields. Privacy research is conducted on various sub-fields, including Computer Vision (CV), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and Computer Networks. Within each field, privacy has its own formulation. Though pioneering works on attacks and defenses reveal sensitive privacy issues, they are narrowly trapped and cannot fully cover people's actual privacy concerns. Consequently, the research on general and human-centric privacy research remains rather unexplored. In this paper, we formulate the privacy issue as a reasoning problem rather than simple pattern matching. We ground on the Contextual Integrity (CI) theory which posits that people's perceptions of privacy are highly correlated with the corresponding social context. Based on such an assumption, we develop the first comprehensive checklist that covers social identities, private attributes, and existing privacy regulations. Unlike prior works on CI that either cover limited expert annotated norms or model incomplete social context, our proposed privacy checklist uses the whole Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) as an example, to show that we can resort to large language models (LLMs) to completely cover the HIPAA's regulations. Additionally, our checklist also gathers expert annotations across multiple ontologies to determine private information including but not limited to personally identifiable information (PII). We use our preliminary results on the HIPAA to shed light on future context-centric privacy research to cover more privacy regulations, social norms and standards.
Read more8/20/2024
๐งช
0
Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory
Niloofar Mireshghallah, Hyunwoo Kim, Xuhui Zhou, Yulia Tsvetkov, Maarten Sap, Reza Shokri, Yejin Choi
The interactive use of large language models (LLMs) in AI assistants (at work, home, etc.) introduces a new set of inference-time privacy risks: LLMs are fed different types of information from multiple sources in their inputs and are expected to reason about what to share in their outputs, for what purpose and with whom, within a given context. In this work, we draw attention to the highly critical yet overlooked notion of contextual privacy by proposing ConfAIde, a benchmark designed to identify critical weaknesses in the privacy reasoning capabilities of instruction-tuned LLMs. Our experiments show that even the most capable models such as GPT-4 and ChatGPT reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. This leakage persists even when we employ privacy-inducing prompts or chain-of-thought reasoning. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
Read more7/2/2024
0
LLM-CI: Assessing Contextual Integrity Norms in Language Models
Yan Shvartzshnaider, Vasisht Duddu, John Lacalamita
Large language models (LLMs), while memorizing parts of their training data scraped from the Internet, may also inadvertently encode societal preferences and norms. As these models are integrated into sociotechnical systems, it is crucial that the norms they encode align with societal expectations. These norms could vary across models, hyperparameters, optimization techniques, and datasets. This is especially challenging due to prompt sensitivity$-$small variations in prompts yield different responses, rendering existing assessment methodologies unreliable. There is a need for a comprehensive framework covering various models, optimization, and datasets, along with a reliable methodology to assess encoded norms. We present LLM-CI, the first open-sourced framework to assess privacy norms encoded in LLMs. LLM-CI uses a Contextual Integrity-based factorial vignette methodology to assess the encoded norms across different contexts and LLMs. We propose the multi-prompt assessment methodology to address prompt sensitivity by assessing the norms from only the prompts that yield consistent responses across multiple variants. Using LLM-CI and our proposed methodology, we comprehensively evaluate LLMs using IoT and COPPA vignettes datasets from prior work, examining the impact of model properties (e.g., hyperparameters, capacity) and optimization strategies (e.g., alignment, quantization).
Read more9/6/2024