LLMs in the Heart of Differential Testing: A Case Study on a Medical Rule Engine
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) in the context of a medical rule engine, focusing on the application of differential testing to improve the reliability and robustness of the system.
- The researchers investigate how LLMs can be integrated into the heart of a differential testing framework to enhance the performance and safety of a medical decision support system.
- The paper presents a case study on a real-world medical rule engine, highlighting the challenges and insights gained from this approach.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. In this research, the authors explored how LLMs can be used to improve the reliability and safety of a medical decision support system, which is a software tool that helps healthcare providers make more informed decisions about patient care.
The researchers focused on a specific type of testing called "differential testing," which involves comparing the outputs of different versions of a system to identify potential issues or inconsistencies. By integrating LLMs into the heart of this testing process, the researchers aimed to make the medical rule engine more robust and trustworthy.
The paper presents a case study on a real-world medical rule engine, which is a software system that applies a set of rules or guidelines to patient data to provide recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. The researchers describe the challenges they faced and the insights they gained from this approach, which could be valuable for other researchers and developers working on similar medical AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes a case study on the integration of large language models (LLMs) into the differential testing process of a medical rule engine. Differential testing is a technique that compares the outputs of different versions of a system to identify potential issues or inconsistencies.
The researchers developed a framework that leverages LLMs as the core component of the differential testing process. This approach allows the system to generate and evaluate a diverse set of test cases, going beyond the limited set of manually curated examples. The LLMs are used to generate input data, predict expected outputs, and assess the consistency of the rule engine's responses.
The paper presents the details of the experimental setup, including the architecture of the system, the training of the LLMs, and the evaluation metrics used to assess the performance and robustness of the medical rule engine. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in identifying and resolving issues that would have been difficult to detect using traditional testing methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a novel and compelling approach to improving the reliability and safety of medical decision support systems by integrating LLMs into the differential testing process. The case study on the real-world medical rule engine highlights the practical challenges and valuable insights that can be gained from this type of research.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or areas for further exploration. For example, the researchers do not discuss the potential biases or errors that could be introduced by the LLMs, which could have a significant impact on the reliability of the test cases generated. Additionally, the paper does not explore the generalizability of this approach to other types of medical AI systems or the scalability of the framework to larger, more complex rule engines.
Further research is needed to address these limitations and explore the broader implications of this approach. Specifically, it would be valuable to investigate the performance and robustness of the system under a wider range of conditions, including more diverse test cases and real-world deployment scenarios. Additionally, a more thorough analysis of the ethical and regulatory implications of this technology in the medical domain would be important to consider.
Conclusion
This paper presents a compelling case study on the integration of large language models (LLMs) into the differential testing process of a medical rule engine. By leveraging the capabilities of LLMs to generate and evaluate a diverse set of test cases, the researchers demonstrate a novel approach to improving the reliability and safety of medical decision support systems.
The insights and lessons learned from this research could have far-reaching implications for the development and deployment of medical AI systems, potentially leading to more trustworthy and robust technologies that can better support healthcare providers and improve patient outcomes. As the field of medical AI continues to evolve, this type of innovative research will be crucial in ensuring the responsible and effective use of these powerful technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
LLMs in the Heart of Differential Testing: A Case Study on a Medical Rule Engine
Erblin Isaku, Christoph Laaber, Hassan Sartaj, Shaukat Ali, Thomas Schwitalla, Jan F. Nyg{aa}rd
The Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN) uses an automated cancer registration support system (CaReSS) to support core cancer registry activities, i.e, data capture, data curation, and producing data products and statistics for various stakeholders. GURI is a core component of CaReSS, which is responsible for validating incoming data with medical rules. Such medical rules are manually implemented by medical experts based on medical standards, regulations, and research. Since large language models (LLMs) have been trained on a large amount of public information, including these documents, they can be employed to generate tests for GURI. Thus, we propose an LLM-based test generation and differential testing approach (LLMeDiff) to test GURI. We experimented with four different LLMs, two medical rule engine implementations, and 58 real medical rules to investigate the hallucination, success, time efficiency, and robustness of the LLMs to generate tests, and these tests' ability to find potential issues in GURI. Our results showed that GPT-3.5 hallucinates the least, is the most successful, and is generally the most robust; however, it has the worst time efficiency. Our differential testing revealed 22 medical rules where implementation inconsistencies were discovered (e.g., regarding handling rule versions). Finally, we provide insights for practitioners and researchers based on the results.
Read more4/10/2024
🤯
0
D-NLP at SemEval-2024 Task 2: Evaluating Clinical Inference Capabilities of Large Language Models
Duygu Altinok
Large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant attention and widespread usage due to their impressive performance in various tasks. However, they are not without their own set of challenges, including issues such as hallucinations, factual inconsistencies, and limitations in numerical-quantitative reasoning. Evaluating LLMs in miscellaneous reasoning tasks remains an active area of research. Prior to the breakthrough of LLMs, Transformers had already proven successful in the medical domain, effectively employed for various natural language understanding (NLU) tasks. Following this trend, LLMs have also been trained and utilized in the medical domain, raising concerns regarding factual accuracy, adherence to safety protocols, and inherent limitations. In this paper, we focus on evaluating the natural language inference capabilities of popular open-source and closed-source LLMs using clinical trial reports as the dataset. We present the performance results of each LLM and further analyze their performance on a development set, particularly focusing on challenging instances that involve medical abbreviations and require numerical-quantitative reasoning. Gemini, our leading LLM, achieved a test set F1-score of 0.748, securing the ninth position on the task scoreboard. Our work is the first of its kind, offering a thorough examination of the inference capabilities of LLMs within the medical domain.
Read more5/8/2024
💬
0
Answering real-world clinical questions using large language model based systems
Yen Sia Low (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Michael L. Jackson (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Rebecca J. Hyde (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Robert E. Brown (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Neil M. Sanghavi (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Julian D. Baldwin (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), C. William Pike (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Jananee Muralidharan (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Gavin Hui (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles CA, USA), Natasha Alexander (Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto ON, Canada), Hadeel Hassan (Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto ON, Canada), Rahul V. Nene (Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego CA, USA), Morgan Pike (Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, USA), Courtney J. Pokrzywa (Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York NY, USA), Shivam Vedak (Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford CA, USA), Adam Paul Yan (Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto ON, Canada), Dong-han Yao (Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford CA, USA), Amy R. Zipursky (Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto ON, Canada), Christina Dinh (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Philip Ballentine (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Dan C. Derieg (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Vladimir Polony (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Rehan N. Chawdry (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Jordan Davies (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Brigham B. Hyde (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA), Nigam H. Shah (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA, Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford CA, USA), Saurabh Gombar (Atropos Health, New York NY, USA, Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford CA, USA)
Evidence to guide healthcare decisions is often limited by a lack of relevant and trustworthy literature as well as difficulty in contextualizing existing research for a specific patient. Large language models (LLMs) could potentially address both challenges by either summarizing published literature or generating new studies based on real-world data (RWD). We evaluated the ability of five LLM-based systems in answering 50 clinical questions and had nine independent physicians review the responses for relevance, reliability, and actionability. As it stands, general-purpose LLMs (ChatGPT-4, Claude 3 Opus, Gemini Pro 1.5) rarely produced answers that were deemed relevant and evidence-based (2% - 10%). In contrast, retrieval augmented generation (RAG)-based and agentic LLM systems produced relevant and evidence-based answers for 24% (OpenEvidence) to 58% (ChatRWD) of questions. Only the agentic ChatRWD was able to answer novel questions compared to other LLMs (65% vs. 0-9%). These results suggest that while general-purpose LLMs should not be used as-is, a purpose-built system for evidence summarization based on RAG and one for generating novel evidence working synergistically would improve availability of pertinent evidence for patient care.
Read more7/2/2024
💬
0
RuleAlign: Making Large Language Models Better Physicians with Diagnostic Rule Alignment
Xiaohan Wang, Xiaoyan Yang, Yuqi Zhu, Yue Shen, Jian Wang, Peng Wei, Lei Liang, Jinjie Gu, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang
Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, MedPaLM-2, and Med-Gemini achieve performance competitively with human experts across various medical benchmarks. However, they still face challenges in making professional diagnoses akin to physicians, particularly in efficiently gathering patient information and reasoning the final diagnosis. To this end, we introduce the RuleAlign framework, designed to align LLMs with specific diagnostic rules. We develop a medical dialogue dataset comprising rule-based communications between patients and physicians and design an alignment learning approach through preference learning. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. We hope that our work can serve as an inspiration for exploring the potential of LLMs as AI physicians.
Read more8/23/2024