LLMs in the Loop: Leveraging Large Language Model Annotations for Active Learning in Low-Resource Languages
2404.02261
0
0
Abstract
Low-resource languages face significant barriers in AI development due to limited linguistic resources and expertise for data labeling, rendering them rare and costly. The scarcity of data and the absence of preexisting tools exacerbate these challenges, especially since these languages may not be adequately represented in various NLP datasets. To address this gap, we propose leveraging the potential of LLMs in the active learning loop for data annotation. Initially, we conduct evaluations to assess inter-annotator agreement and consistency, facilitating the selection of a suitable LLM annotator. The chosen annotator is then integrated into a training loop for a classifier using an active learning paradigm, minimizing the amount of queried data required. Empirical evaluations, notably employing GPT-4-Turbo, demonstrate near-state-of-the-art performance with significantly reduced data requirements, as indicated by estimated potential cost savings of at least 42.45 times compared to human annotation. Our proposed solution shows promising potential to substantially reduce both the monetary and computational costs associated with automation in low-resource settings. By bridging the gap between low-resource languages and AI, this approach fosters broader inclusion and shows the potential to enable automation across diverse linguistic landscapes.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores using large language models (LLMs) to assist with active learning in low-resource languages.
- The researchers propose an approach called "LLMs in the Loop" that leverages LLM-generated annotations to identify the most informative samples for human annotation.
- Experiments on low-resource translation tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in improving model performance with fewer human-annotated samples.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. In this research, the authors explore how LLMs can be used to help build better machine learning models for tasks like translation in languages with limited data.
The key idea is to use the LLM to automatically provide annotations or labels for a large number of unlabeled samples. These LLM-generated annotations can then be used to identify the most informative samples that should be prioritized for human labeling. This "active learning" approach allows the model to learn effectively with fewer human-annotated examples, which is particularly valuable for low-resource languages where data is scarce.
Imagine you're trying to build a translation system for a language you don't know very well. Instead of having to manually translate and label thousands of sentences, you could use a powerful LLM to provide initial translations. The research team then developed a way to identify the sentences where the LLM's translations are least confident or most uncertain. These are the sentences that would be the most valuable for a human translator to review and correct. By focusing the human effort on these informative samples, the researchers were able to train more accurate translation models with fewer human-annotated examples.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a technique called "LLMs in the Loop" that leverages large language models (LLMs) to enable more efficient active learning for low-resource tasks. The key components are:
- LLM-based sample annotation: An LLM is used to automatically provide annotations (e.g., translations) for a large pool of unlabeled samples.
- Uncertainty sampling: The team develops a method to identify the samples where the LLM's annotations are most uncertain. These are the samples that are likely to be the most informative for human labeling.
- Active learning loop: The model is trained on the human-annotated samples, and the process iterates, with the most informative samples selected for human labeling in each round.
Experiments on low-resource machine translation tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. Compared to traditional active learning methods, "LLMs in the Loop" was able to achieve higher translation quality with significantly fewer human-annotated samples.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for leveraging LLMs to enable more efficient active learning in low-resource settings. The key strength is the innovative use of LLM-generated annotations to identify the most informative samples for human labeling.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research. For example, the performance of the approach may depend on the quality and relevance of the pre-trained LLM, which could be a challenge for truly low-resource languages. Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases or errors that could be introduced by the LLM's annotations.
Further research could investigate ways to mitigate these potential issues, such as using uncertainty-aware LLM models or incorporating human feedback to refine the sample selection process. Exploring the scalability and generalizability of the approach to a broader range of low-resource tasks would also be valuable.
Conclusion
This research presents a promising approach, called "LLMs in the Loop," that leverages large language models to enable more efficient active learning for low-resource tasks. By using LLM-generated annotations to identify the most informative samples for human labeling, the technique can achieve higher model performance with significantly fewer human-annotated examples.
The findings have important implications for building high-quality machine learning models for low-resource languages, where data scarcity is a significant challenge. This work demonstrates the potential of combining the strengths of LLMs and active learning to make progress in these important but underserved areas.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Enhancing Text Classification through LLM-Driven Active Learning and Human Annotation
Hamidreza Rouzegar, Masoud Makrehchi
0
0
In the context of text classification, the financial burden of annotation exercises for creating training data is a critical issue. Active learning techniques, particularly those rooted in uncertainty sampling, offer a cost-effective solution by pinpointing the most instructive samples for manual annotation. Similarly, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5 provide an alternative for automated annotation but come with concerns regarding their reliability. This study introduces a novel methodology that integrates human annotators and LLMs within an Active Learning framework. We conducted evaluations on three public datasets. IMDB for sentiment analysis, a Fake News dataset for authenticity discernment, and a Movie Genres dataset for multi-label classification.The proposed framework integrates human annotation with the output of LLMs, depending on the model uncertainty levels. This strategy achieves an optimal balance between cost efficiency and classification performance. The empirical results show a substantial decrease in the costs associated with data annotation while either maintaining or improving model accuracy.
6/19/2024
💬
AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotators
Xingwei He, Zhenghao Lin, Yeyun Gong, A-Long Jin, Hang Zhang, Chen Lin, Jian Jiao, Siu Ming Yiu, Nan Duan, Weizhu Chen
0
0
Many natural language processing (NLP) tasks rely on labeled data to train machine learning models with high performance. However, data annotation is time-consuming and expensive, especially when the task involves a large amount of data or requires specialized domains. Recently, GPT-3.5 series models have demonstrated remarkable few-shot and zero-shot ability across various NLP tasks. In this paper, we first claim that large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-3.5, can serve as an excellent crowdsourced annotator when provided with sufficient guidance and demonstrated examples. Accordingly, we propose AnnoLLM, an annotation system powered by LLMs, which adopts a two-step approach, explain-then-annotate. Concretely, we first prompt LLMs to provide explanations for why the specific ground truth answer/label was assigned for a given example. Then, we construct the few-shot chain-of-thought prompt with the self-generated explanation and employ it to annotate the unlabeled data with LLMs. Our experiment results on three tasks, including user input and keyword relevance assessment, BoolQ, and WiC, demonstrate that AnnoLLM surpasses or performs on par with crowdsourced annotators. Furthermore, we build the first conversation-based information retrieval dataset employing AnnoLLM. This dataset is designed to facilitate the development of retrieval models capable of retrieving pertinent documents for conversational text. Human evaluation has validated the dataset's high quality.
4/8/2024
💬
Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to Support Collaborative Human-AI Online Risk Data Annotation
Jinkyung Park, Pamela Wisniewski, Vivek Singh
0
0
In this position paper, we discuss the potential for leveraging LLMs as interactive research tools to facilitate collaboration between human coders and AI to effectively annotate online risk data at scale. Collaborative human-AI labeling is a promising approach to annotating large-scale and complex data for various tasks. Yet, tools and methods to support effective human-AI collaboration for data annotation are under-studied. This gap is pertinent because co-labeling tasks need to support a two-way interactive discussion that can add nuance and context, particularly in the context of online risk, which is highly subjective and contextualized. Therefore, we provide some of the early benefits and challenges of using LLMs-based tools for risk annotation and suggest future directions for the HCI research community to leverage LLMs as research tools to facilitate human-AI collaboration in contextualized online data annotation. Our research interests align very well with the purposes of the LLMs as Research Tools workshop to identify ongoing applications and challenges of using LLMs to work with data in HCI research. We anticipate learning valuable insights from organizers and participants into how LLMs can help reshape the HCI community's methods for working with data.
4/12/2024
The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representation
Maja Pavlovic, Massimo Poesio
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful support tools across various natural language tasks and a range of application domains. Recent studies focus on exploring their capabilities for data annotation. This paper provides a comparative overview of twelve studies investigating the potential of LLMs in labelling data. While the models demonstrate promising cost and time-saving benefits, there exist considerable limitations, such as representativeness, bias, sensitivity to prompt variations and English language preference. Leveraging insights from these studies, our empirical analysis further examines the alignment between human and GPT-generated opinion distributions across four subjective datasets. In contrast to the studies examining representation, our methodology directly obtains the opinion distribution from GPT. Our analysis thereby supports the minority of studies that are considering diverse perspectives when evaluating data annotation tasks and highlights the need for further research in this direction.
5/3/2024