LMO-DP: Optimizing the Randomization Mechanism for Differentially Private Fine-Tuning (Large) Language Models
2405.18776
0
0
Abstract
Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) and its variants have been proposed to ensure rigorous privacy for fine-tuning large-scale pre-trained language models. However, they rely heavily on the Gaussian mechanism, which may overly perturb the gradients and degrade the accuracy, especially in stronger privacy regimes (e.g., the privacy budget $epsilon < 3$). To address such limitations, we propose a novel Language Model-based Optimal Differential Privacy (LMO-DP) mechanism, which takes the first step to enable the tight composition of accurately fine-tuning (large) language models with a sub-optimal DP mechanism, even in strong privacy regimes (e.g., $0.1leq epsilon<3$). Furthermore, we propose a novel offline optimal noise search method to efficiently derive the sub-optimal DP that significantly reduces the noise magnitude. For instance, fine-tuning RoBERTa-large (with 300M parameters) on the SST-2 dataset can achieve an accuracy of 92.20% (given $epsilon=0.3$, $delta=10^{-10}$) by drastically outperforming the Gaussian mechanism (e.g., $sim 50%$ for small $epsilon$ and $delta$). We also draw similar findings on the text generation tasks on GPT-2. Finally, to our best knowledge, LMO-DP is also the first solution to accurately fine-tune Llama-2 with strong differential privacy guarantees. The code will be released soon and available upon request.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper focuses on optimizing the randomization mechanism for differentially private fine-tuning of large language models.
- The authors propose a new approach called LMO-DP that aims to improve the privacy-utility trade-off compared to existing techniques.
- LMO-DP is designed to be scalable and applicable to fine-tuning of large language models on various tasks.
Plain English Explanation
When training machine learning models on sensitive data, it's important to protect the privacy of the individuals in the training data. Differential privacy is a technique that adds carefully controlled noise to the model updates to prevent the model from revealing too much about the individual training examples.
However, applying differential privacy to large language models can be challenging, as the models are complex and the training process is computationally intensive. The authors of this paper introduce a new approach called LMO-DP that aims to address these challenges.
LMO-DP optimizes the randomization mechanism used in the differential privacy process to improve the balance between privacy and the accuracy of the resulting model. This means the model can retain more of its performance capabilities while still protecting individual privacy. The approach is designed to be scalable, allowing it to be used for fine-tuning large language models on a variety of tasks, such as next token prediction or text generation.
Technical Explanation
The core idea of LMO-DP is to optimize the randomization mechanism used in the differential privacy process. Traditionally, differential privacy adds noise to the model updates in a way that is independent of the specific task or model architecture. In contrast, LMO-DP learns a task-specific randomization mechanism that can better balance privacy and utility.
The authors formulate this as a bi-level optimization problem, where the outer loop learns the randomization mechanism, and the inner loop fine-tunes the language model using the current randomization mechanism. They show that this approach can significantly improve the privacy-utility trade-off compared to standard differentially private fine-tuning techniques.
The authors evaluate LMO-DP on a range of language modeling tasks, including synthetic query generation and log-location-scale regression. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the LMO-DP approach in preserving model performance while providing strong privacy guarantees.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge that LMO-DP requires more computational resources than standard differentially private fine-tuning, as the outer optimization loop adds complexity. They also note that the performance improvements of LMO-DP may diminish as the privacy budget (the amount of noise added) increases.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the robustness of the LMO-DP approach to different types of attacks or potential adversarial manipulations of the training data. Further research could investigate the security implications and potential vulnerabilities of the proposed technique.
It would also be valuable to see the LMO-DP approach applied to a wider range of language modeling tasks and datasets to better understand its generalizability and limitations.
Conclusion
The LMO-DP approach presented in this paper offers a promising solution for improving the privacy-utility trade-off in the fine-tuning of large language models. By optimizing the randomization mechanism used in the differential privacy process, the authors demonstrate significant performance gains while still providing strong privacy guarantees.
This work contributes to the ongoing efforts to develop privacy-preserving machine learning techniques that can be applied to sensitive domains, such as healthcare, finance, and personal communications. As large language models become more pervasive, techniques like LMO-DP will play an important role in ensuring the responsible and ethical development of these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Differentially Private Zeroth-Order Methods for Scalable Large Language Model Finetuning
Z Liu, J Lou, W Bao, Y Hu, B Li, Z Qin, K Ren
0
0
Fine-tuning on task-specific datasets is a widely-embraced paradigm of harnessing the powerful capability of pretrained LLMs for various downstream tasks. Due to the popularity of LLMs fine-tuning and its accompanying privacy concerns, differentially private (DP) fine-tuning of pretrained LLMs has been widely used to safeguarding the privacy of task-specific datasets. Lying at the design core of DP LLM fine-tuning methods is the satisfactory tradeoff among privacy, utility, and scalability. Most existing methods build upon the seminal work of DP-SGD. Despite pushing the scalability of DP-SGD to its limit, DP-SGD-based fine-tuning methods are unfortunately limited by the inherent inefficiency of SGD. In this paper, we investigate the potential of DP zeroth-order methods for LLM pretraining, which avoids the scalability bottleneck of SGD by approximating the gradient with the more efficient zeroth-order gradient. Rather than treating the zeroth-order method as a drop-in replacement for SGD, this paper presents a comprehensive study both theoretically and empirically. First, we propose the stagewise DP zeroth-order method (DP-ZOSO) that dynamically schedules key hyperparameters. This design is grounded on the synergy between DP random perturbation and the gradient approximation error of the zeroth-order method, and its effect on fine-tuning trajectory. We provide theoretical analysis for both proposed methods. We conduct extensive empirical analysis on both encoder-only masked language model and decoder-only autoregressive language model, achieving impressive results in terms of scalability and utility (compared with DPZero, DP-ZOPO improves 4.5% on SST-5, 5.5% on MNLI with RoBERTa-Large and 9.2% on CB, 3.9% on BoolQ with OPT-2.7B when $epsilon=4$).
5/10/2024
Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning
Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Yangsibo Huang, Pritish Kamath, Daogao Liu, Pasin Manurangsi, Amer Sinha, Chiyuan Zhang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for tackling complex tasks across diverse domains, but they also raise privacy concerns when fine-tuned on sensitive data due to potential memorization. While differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are `almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit, current evaluations on LLMs mostly treat each example (text record) as the privacy unit. This leads to uneven user privacy guarantees when contributions per user vary. We therefore study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users. We present a systematic evaluation of user-level DP for LLM fine-tuning on natural language generation tasks. Focusing on two mechanisms for achieving user-level DP guarantees, Group Privacy and User-wise DP-SGD, we investigate design choices like data selection strategies and parameter tuning for the best privacy-utility tradeoff.
6/21/2024
Differentially Private Next-Token Prediction of Large Language Models
James Flemings, Meisam Razaviyayn, Murali Annavaram
0
0
Ensuring the privacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) is becoming increasingly important. The most widely adopted technique to accomplish this is DP-SGD, which trains a model to guarantee Differential Privacy (DP). However, DP-SGD overestimates an adversary's capabilities in having white box access to the model and, as a result, causes longer training times and larger memory usage than SGD. On the other hand, commercial LLM deployments are predominantly cloud-based; hence, adversarial access to LLMs is black-box. Motivated by these observations, we present Private Mixing of Ensemble Distributions (PMixED): a private prediction protocol for next-token prediction that utilizes the inherent stochasticity of next-token sampling and a public model to achieve Differential Privacy. We formalize this by introducing RD-mollifers which project each of the model's output distribution from an ensemble of fine-tuned LLMs onto a set around a public LLM's output distribution, then average the projected distributions and sample from it. Unlike DP-SGD which needs to consider the model architecture during training, PMixED is model agnostic, which makes PMixED a very appealing solution for current deployments. Our results show that PMixED achieves a stronger privacy guarantee than sample-level privacy and outperforms DP-SGD for privacy $epsilon = 8$ on large-scale datasets. Thus, PMixED offers a practical alternative to DP training methods for achieving strong generative utility without compromising privacy.
4/30/2024
Differentially Private Fine-Tuning of Diffusion Models
Yu-Lin Tsai, Yizhe Li, Zekai Chen, Po-Yu Chen, Chia-Mu Yu, Xuebin Ren, Francois Buet-Golfouse
0
0
The integration of Differential Privacy (DP) with diffusion models (DMs) presents a promising yet challenging frontier, particularly due to the substantial memorization capabilities of DMs that pose significant privacy risks. Differential privacy offers a rigorous framework for safeguarding individual data points during model training, with Differential Privacy Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) being a prominent implementation. Diffusion method decomposes image generation into iterative steps, theoretically aligning well with DP's incremental noise addition. Despite the natural fit, the unique architecture of DMs necessitates tailored approaches to effectively balance privacy-utility trade-off. Recent developments in this field have highlighted the potential for generating high-quality synthetic data by pre-training on public data (i.e., ImageNet) and fine-tuning on private data, however, there is a pronounced gap in research on optimizing the trade-offs involved in DP settings, particularly concerning parameter efficiency and model scalability. Our work addresses this by proposing a parameter-efficient fine-tuning strategy optimized for private diffusion models, which minimizes the number of trainable parameters to enhance the privacy-utility trade-off. We empirically demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in DP synthesis, significantly surpassing previous benchmarks on widely studied datasets (e.g., with only 0.47M trainable parameters, achieving a more than 35% improvement over the previous state-of-the-art with a small privacy budget on the CelebA-64 dataset). Anonymous codes available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DP-LORA-F02F.
6/4/2024