Local Model Reconstruction Attacks in Federated Learning and their Uses

Overview

• This paper explores a type of attack called "local model reconstruction" in the context of federated learning.
• In federated learning, a central server coordinates the training of a shared model using data from many clients, without clients sharing their raw data.
• The authors show that an eavesdropping adversary can reconstruct a client's personalized local model, which may leak more private information than the global model.
• They also propose a new "attribute inference" attack that leverages the local model reconstruction to infer private attributes about clients.
• The paper provides analytical and empirical results demonstrating the effectiveness of these attacks, especially when clients' datasets are diverse.

Plain English Explanation

In federated learning, a central server coordinates the training of a shared machine learning model using data from many different clients, without the clients having to share their raw data. This helps protect the privacy of the clients' data.

However, the authors of this paper show that there's a potential vulnerability in this setup. They explain that an eavesdropping "adversary" (or attacker) could intercept the messages sent between a targeted client and the server. The adversary could then use this information to reconstruct the client's own personalized "local" model, which may reveal more private details about the client's data than the final shared "global" model.

This local model reconstruction attack could then be used to trigger other types of attacks that are even more effective at revealing private information about the client. The paper also introduces a new kind of attack called "attribute inference," where the adversary tries to infer specific private attributes about the client based on the reconstructed local model.

Through analytical and experimental results, the authors demonstrate that these attacks can be quite effective, especially when the clients' datasets are diverse (i.e., the data from different clients varies a lot). This highlights an important privacy risk in federated learning that system designers will need to address.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contributions of this paper are:

1. Local Model Reconstruction Attack: The authors show how an eavesdropping "honest-but-curious" adversary can reconstruct a targeted client's local/personalized model by observing the messages exchanged between the client and the federated learning server. This local model reconstruction attack is more effective than attacks targeting the global model, as the local model is more closely tied to the client's private data.

2. Novel Attribute Inference Attack: Building on the local model reconstruction, the authors propose a new "model-based attribute inference attack" in federated learning. This allows the adversary to infer private attributes about the client from the reconstructed local model. The paper provides an analytical lower-bound for the accuracy of this attack.

3. Empirical Evaluation: The authors evaluate their attacks on real-world datasets, showing that the local reconstruction attack works well for both regression and classification tasks. They also benchmark the attribute inference attack against prior state-of-the-art attacks in federated learning, demonstrating higher reconstruction accuracy, especially when clients' datasets are heterogeneous.

The key insights from this work are that the local models in federated learning can leak more private information than the global model, and that adversaries can leverage this vulnerability to launch powerful and explainable attacks that quantify privacy risks. This expands on prior research on gradient leakage and label recovery attacks in federated learning.

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a thorough analysis of the local model reconstruction attack and the new attribute inference attack, with strong analytical and empirical support. However, some caveats and limitations are worth noting:

• The threat model assumes a "honest-but-curious" adversary, which may not capture all real-world attack scenarios. More powerful adversaries could potentially exploit additional vulnerabilities.
• The effectiveness of the attacks is shown to depend on the heterogeneity of clients' datasets. It's unclear how these attacks would perform in more homogeneous federated learning settings.
• The paper does not discuss potential defenses against these attacks. Exploring mitigation strategies would be an important next step for this line of research.
• While the attacks reveal significant privacy risks, the paper does not quantify the potential harm or provide a broader societal context around the implications of these privacy breaches in federated learning.

Overall, this work identifies an important vulnerability in federated learning systems and proposes novel attacks that should motivate further research into strengthening the privacy guarantees of federated learning.

Conclusion

This paper initiates the study of local model reconstruction attacks in federated learning, where an eavesdropping adversary can exploit the personalized local models of clients to launch powerful attacks that reveal more private information than attacks targeting the global model.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of these attacks, both analytically and empirically, and introduce a new attribute inference attack that leverages the local model reconstruction. Their results highlight a significant privacy risk in federated learning systems, especially when clients' datasets are heterogeneous.

This work contributes to the growing body of research on privacy attacks in federated learning and emphasizes the need for developing robust defenses to ensure the privacy and security of federated learning deployments.