Understanding Data Reconstruction Leakage in Federated Learning from a Theoretical Perspective
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Provides a theoretical understanding of data reconstruction leakage in federated learning
- Analyzes the fundamental limits of information leakage from model updates in federated learning
- Proposes new theoretical bounds and quantification techniques for data reconstruction leakage
Plain English Explanation
Federated learning is a technique where multiple devices or organizations collaborate to train a machine learning model without directly sharing their private data. Instead, they share updates to the model during the training process. However, there are concerns that these model updates could potentially leak information about the underlying data, allowing the model to be used to reconstruct the original data.
This paper takes a deep dive into this issue from a theoretical perspective. It analyzes the fundamental limits of how much information can be leaked through the model updates in federated learning. The researchers propose new techniques to quantify this data reconstruction leakage and establish theoretical bounds on how much information can be leaked.
By gaining a better understanding of the theoretical limits of data leakage in federated learning, this research helps inform the design of more secure federated learning systems that can better protect the privacy of the underlying data.
Technical Explanation
The paper starts by introducing the problem of data reconstruction leakage in federated learning. It then reviews related work on attacks and defenses in this area.
The key technical contributions of the paper are:
-
Theoretical Analysis: The researchers provide a theoretical analysis of the fundamental limits of information leakage from model updates in federated learning. They derive new theoretical bounds on the amount of information that can be reconstructed from the model updates.
-
Quantification Techniques: The paper proposes new techniques to quantify the data reconstruction leakage, going beyond simple metrics like model inversion. These techniques allow for a more rigorous and comprehensive evaluation of the privacy risks.
-
Experiments: The researchers conduct experiments on various federated learning scenarios to validate their theoretical analysis and quantification techniques. They demonstrate how the proposed methods can be used to better understand and mitigate data reconstruction leakage.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a strong theoretical foundation for understanding data reconstruction leakage in federated learning. The proposed techniques for quantifying leakage are a significant advancement over previous approaches.
However, the analysis is limited to the specific threat model and assumptions made in the paper. In practice, there may be other ways that data could be reconstructed or leaked in federated learning systems. The paper does not address all possible attack vectors or consider the dynamic nature of real-world federated learning deployments.
Additionally, while the theoretical bounds and quantification methods are valuable, translating these into practical privacy-preserving mechanisms for federated learning still requires further research and engineering effort. The paper acknowledges this and encourages future work in this direction.
Conclusion
This paper offers a rigorous, theoretical understanding of data reconstruction leakage in federated learning. By establishing new bounds and quantification techniques, it provides a foundation for designing more secure federated learning systems that can better protect the privacy of the underlying data.
The insights from this research are an important step towards realizing the full potential of federated learning while addressing the critical privacy challenges. As federated learning continues to gain traction, this work will help guide the development of practical, privacy-preserving solutions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Understanding Data Reconstruction Leakage in Federated Learning from a Theoretical Perspective
Zifan Wang, Binghui Zhang, Meng Pang, Yuan Hong, Binghui Wang
Federated learning (FL) is an emerging collaborative learning paradigm that aims to protect data privacy. Unfortunately, recent works show FL algorithms are vulnerable to the serious data reconstruction attacks. However, existing works lack a theoretical foundation on to what extent the devices' data can be reconstructed and the effectiveness of these attacks cannot be compared fairly due to their unstable performance. To address this deficiency, we propose a theoretical framework to understand data reconstruction attacks to FL. Our framework involves bounding the data reconstruction error and an attack's error bound reflects its inherent attack effectiveness. Under the framework, we can theoretically compare the effectiveness of existing attacks. For instance, our results on multiple datasets validate that the iDLG attack inherently outperforms the DLG attack.
Read more8/23/2024
📈
0
Local Model Reconstruction Attacks in Federated Learning and their Uses
Ilias Driouich, Chuan Xu, Giovanni Neglia, Frederic Giroire, Eoin Thomas
In this paper, we initiate the study of local model reconstruction attacks for federated learning, where a honest-but-curious adversary eavesdrops the messages exchanged between a targeted client and the server, and then reconstructs the local/personalized model of the victim. The local model reconstruction attack allows the adversary to trigger other classical attacks in a more effective way, since the local model only depends on the client's data and can leak more private information than the global model learned by the server. Additionally, we propose a novel model-based attribute inference attack in federated learning leveraging the local model reconstruction attack. We provide an analytical lower-bound for this attribute inference attack. Empirical results using real world datasets confirm that our local reconstruction attack works well for both regression and classification tasks. Moreover, we benchmark our novel attribute inference attack against the state-of-the-art attacks in federated learning. Our attack results in higher reconstruction accuracy especially when the clients' datasets are heterogeneous. Our work provides a new angle for designing powerful and explainable attacks to effectively quantify the privacy risk in FL.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Data Reconstruction Attacks and Defenses: A Systematic Evaluation
Sheng Liu, Zihan Wang, Yuxiao Chen, Qi Lei
Reconstruction attacks and defenses are essential in understanding the data leakage problem in machine learning. However, prior work has centered around empirical observations of gradient inversion attacks, lacks theoretical justifications, and cannot disentangle the usefulness of defending methods from the computational limitation of attacking methods. In this work, we propose to view the problem as an inverse problem, enabling us to theoretically, quantitatively, and systematically evaluate the data reconstruction problem. On various defense methods, we derived the algorithmic upper bound and the matching (in feature dimension and model width) information-theoretical lower bound on the reconstruction error for two-layer neural networks. To complement the theoretical results and investigate the utility-privacy trade-off, we defined a natural evaluation metric of the defense methods with similar utility loss among the strongest attacks. We further propose a strong reconstruction attack that helps update some previous understanding of the strength of defense methods under our proposed evaluation metric.
Read more6/28/2024
0
SoK: Gradient Leakage in Federated Learning
Jiacheng Du, Jiahui Hu, Zhibo Wang, Peng Sun, Neil Zhenqiang Gong, Kui Ren
Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training among multiple clients without raw data exposure. However, recent studies have shown that clients' private training data can be reconstructed from the gradients they share in FL, known as gradient inversion attacks (GIAs). While GIAs have demonstrated effectiveness under emph{ideal settings and auxiliary assumptions}, their actual efficacy against emph{practical FL systems} remains under-explored. To address this gap, we conduct a comprehensive study on GIAs in this work. We start with a survey of GIAs that establishes a milestone to trace their evolution and develops a systematization to uncover their inherent threats. Specifically, we categorize the auxiliary assumptions used by existing GIAs based on their practical accessibility to potential adversaries. To facilitate deeper analysis, we highlight the challenges that GIAs face in practical FL systems from three perspectives: textit{local training}, textit{model}, and textit{post-processing}. We then perform extensive theoretical and empirical evaluations of state-of-the-art GIAs across diverse settings, utilizing eight datasets and thirteen models. Our findings indicate that GIAs have inherent limitations when reconstructing data under practical local training settings. Furthermore, their efficacy is sensitive to the trained model, and even simple post-processing measures applied to gradients can be effective defenses. Overall, our work provides crucial insights into the limited effectiveness of GIAs in practical FL systems. By rectifying prior misconceptions, we hope to inspire more accurate and realistic investigations on this topic.
Read more4/9/2024