FakeGPT: Fake News Generation, Explanation and Detection of Large Language Models
2310.05046
0
5
🔎
Abstract
The rampant spread of fake news has adversely affected society, resulting in extensive research on curbing its spread. As a notable milestone in large language models (LLMs), ChatGPT has gained significant attention due to its exceptional natural language processing capabilities. In this study, we present a thorough exploration of ChatGPT's proficiency in generating, explaining, and detecting fake news as follows. Generation -- We employ four prompt methods to generate fake news samples and prove the high quality of these samples through both self-assessment and human evaluation. Explanation -- We obtain nine features to characterize fake news based on ChatGPT's explanations and analyze the distribution of these factors across multiple public datasets. Detection -- We examine ChatGPT's capacity to identify fake news. We explore its detection consistency and then propose a reason-aware prompt method to improve its performance. Although our experiments demonstrate that ChatGPT shows commendable performance in detecting fake news, there is still room for its improvement. Consequently, we further probe into the potential extra information that could bolster its effectiveness in detecting fake news.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This study examines ChatGPT's capabilities in generating, explaining, and detecting fake news.
- The researchers use four prompt methods to generate high-quality fake news samples, analyze the characteristics of fake news using ChatGPT's explanations, and evaluate ChatGPT's ability to detect fake news.
- The findings suggest that while ChatGPT demonstrates commendable performance in detecting fake news, there is still room for improvement, and the researchers explore potential ways to enhance its effectiveness.
Plain English Explanation
The rapid spread of false or misleading information, often referred to as "fake news," has had a significant impact on society. In response, researchers have conducted extensive studies to find ways to curb the spread of fake news. As a notable advancement in large language models (LLMs), ChatGPT has gained significant attention due to its exceptional natural language processing capabilities.
This study explores ChatGPT's proficiency in three key areas related to fake news:
-
Generation: The researchers use four different prompt methods to generate fake news samples and evaluate their quality through both self-assessment and human evaluation.
-
Explanation: The study identifies nine features that characterize fake news based on ChatGPT's explanations, and analyzes the distribution of these factors across multiple public datasets.
-
Detection: The researchers examine ChatGPT's ability to identify fake news, including its detection consistency, and propose a "reason-aware" prompt method to improve its performance.
While the experiments demonstrate that ChatGPT shows commendable performance in detecting fake news, the researchers acknowledge that there is still room for improvement. They further explore the potential additional information that could enhance ChatGPT's effectiveness in this task.
Technical Explanation
The researchers employ four prompt methods to generate fake news samples, including using factual information with modifications, employing logical fallacies, incorporating misleading statistics, and combining real and fabricated elements. They then assess the quality of these samples through both self-evaluation and human evaluation, finding that the generated fake news samples are of high quality.
To understand the characteristics of fake news, the study identifies nine features based on ChatGPT's explanations, such as the use of emotional language, lack of supporting evidence, and the presence of logical inconsistencies. The researchers analyze the distribution of these factors across multiple public datasets, providing insights into the nature of fake news.
Additionally, the researchers examine ChatGPT's ability to detect fake news. They explore its detection consistency and propose a "reason-aware" prompt method, which encourages ChatGPT to provide explanations for its decisions. This approach aims to improve ChatGPT's performance in identifying fake news.
The findings suggest that while ChatGPT demonstrates commendable performance in detecting fake news, there is still room for improvement. The researchers further investigate the potential additional information, such as fact-checking or contextual cues, that could enhance ChatGPT's effectiveness in this task.
Critical Analysis
The study provides a comprehensive exploration of ChatGPT's capabilities in generating, explaining, and detecting fake news. The researchers acknowledge that while ChatGPT's performance in detecting fake news is commendable, there is still room for improvement. They highlight the need for further research to identify additional information that could enhance ChatGPT's effectiveness in this task.
One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on self-assessment and human evaluation for the quality of the generated fake news samples. While the researchers suggest that the samples are of high quality, it would be valuable to explore more objective measures of fake news detection, such as comparing the generated content to known fact-based sources.
Additionally, the study focuses on ChatGPT's capabilities, but it would be interesting to see a comparative analysis of how other large language models perform in the same tasks. This could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the state-of-the-art in fake news detection using AI-powered language models.
Conclusion
This study presents a thorough investigation of ChatGPT's proficiency in generating, explaining, and detecting fake news. The researchers demonstrate that ChatGPT can generate high-quality fake news samples and provide insights into the characteristics of fake news. While the findings suggest that ChatGPT shows commendable performance in detecting fake news, the researchers identify areas for further improvement and propose exploring additional information that could enhance its effectiveness.
The implications of this research are significant, as it highlights the potential of large language models, such as ChatGPT, in addressing the pressing challenge of fake news. By understanding the capabilities and limitations of these models, researchers and policymakers can develop more effective strategies to combat the spread of misinformation and promote the dissemination of accurate, fact-based information.
Related Papers
🔎
Adapting Fake News Detection to the Era of Large Language Models
Jinyan Su, Claire Cardie, Preslav Nakov
0
0
In the age of large language models (LLMs) and the widespread adoption of AI-driven content creation, the landscape of information dissemination has witnessed a paradigm shift. With the proliferation of both human-written and machine-generated real and fake news, robustly and effectively discerning the veracity of news articles has become an intricate challenge. While substantial research has been dedicated to fake news detection, this either assumes that all news articles are human-written or abruptly assumes that all machine-generated news are fake. Thus, a significant gap exists in understanding the interplay between machine-(paraphrased) real news, machine-generated fake news, human-written fake news, and human-written real news. In this paper, we study this gap by conducting a comprehensive evaluation of fake news detectors trained in various scenarios. Our primary objectives revolve around the following pivotal question: How to adapt fake news detectors to the era of LLMs? Our experiments reveal an interesting pattern that detectors trained exclusively on human-written articles can indeed perform well at detecting machine-generated fake news, but not vice versa. Moreover, due to the bias of detectors against machine-generated texts cite{su2023fake}, they should be trained on datasets with a lower machine-generated news ratio than the test set. Building on our findings, we provide a practical strategy for the development of robust fake news detectors.
4/16/2024
🔎
Detection of ChatGPT Fake Science with the xFakeSci Learning Algorithm
Ahmed Abdeen Hamed, Xindong Wu
0
0
Generative AI tools exemplified by ChatGPT are becoming a new reality. This study is motivated by the premise that ``AI generated content may exhibit a distinctive behavior that can be separated from scientific articles''. In this study, we show how articles can be generated using means of prompt engineering for various diseases and conditions. We then show how we tested this premise in two phases and prove its validity. Subsequently, we introduce xFakeSci, a novel learning algorithm, that is capable of distinguishing ChatGPT-generated articles from publications produced by scientists. The algorithm is trained using network models driven from both sources. As for the classification step, it was performed using 300 articles per condition. The actual label steps took place against an equal mix of 50 generated articles and 50 authentic PubMed abstracts. The testing also spanned publication periods from 2010 to 2024 and encompassed research on three distinct diseases: cancer, depression, and Alzheimer's. Further, we evaluated the accuracy of the xFakeSci algorithm against some of the classical data mining algorithms (e.g., Support Vector Machines, Regression, and Naive Bayes). The xFakeSci algorithm achieved F1 scores ranging from 80% to 94%, outperforming common data mining algorithms, which scored F1 values between 38% and 52%. We attribute the noticeable difference to the introduction of calibration and a proximity distance heuristic, which underscores this promising performance. Indeed, the prediction of fake science generated by ChatGPT presents a considerable challenge. Nonetheless, the introduction of the xFakeSci algorithm is a significant step on the way to combating fake science.
4/16/2024
💬
ChatGPT v.s. Media Bias: A Comparative Study of GPT-3.5 and Fine-tuned Language Models
Zehao Wen, Rabih Younes
0
0
In our rapidly evolving digital sphere, the ability to discern media bias becomes crucial as it can shape public sentiment and influence pivotal decisions. The advent of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, noted for their broad utility in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, invites exploration of their efficacy in media bias detection. Can ChatGPT detect media bias? This study seeks to answer this question by leveraging the Media Bias Identification Benchmark (MBIB) to assess ChatGPT's competency in distinguishing six categories of media bias, juxtaposed against fine-tuned models such as BART, ConvBERT, and GPT-2. The findings present a dichotomy: ChatGPT performs at par with fine-tuned models in detecting hate speech and text-level context bias, yet faces difficulties with subtler elements of other bias detections, namely, fake news, racial, gender, and cognitive biases.
4/1/2024
Large Language Model Agent for Fake News Detection
Xinyi Li, Yongfeng Zhang, Edward C. Malthouse
0
0
In the current digital era, the rapid spread of misinformation on online platforms presents significant challenges to societal well-being, public trust, and democratic processes, influencing critical decision making and public opinion. To address these challenges, there is a growing need for automated fake news detection mechanisms. Pre-trained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities across various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, prompting exploration into their potential for verifying news claims. Instead of employing LLMs in a non-agentic way, where LLMs generate responses based on direct prompts in a single shot, our work introduces FactAgent, an agentic approach of utilizing LLMs for fake news detection. FactAgent enables LLMs to emulate human expert behavior in verifying news claims without any model training, following a structured workflow. This workflow breaks down the complex task of news veracity checking into multiple sub-steps, where LLMs complete simple tasks using their internal knowledge or external tools. At the final step of the workflow, LLMs integrate all findings throughout the workflow to determine the news claim's veracity. Compared to manual human verification, FactAgent offers enhanced efficiency. Experimental studies demonstrate the effectiveness of FactAgent in verifying claims without the need for any training process. Moreover, FactAgent provides transparent explanations at each step of the workflow and during final decision-making, offering insights into the reasoning process of fake news detection for end users. FactAgent is highly adaptable, allowing for straightforward updates to its tools that LLMs can leverage within the workflow, as well as updates to the workflow itself using domain knowledge. This adaptability enables FactAgent's application to news verification across various domains.
5/6/2024