Logical Synchrony Networks: A formal model for deterministic distribution

Read original: arXiv:2402.07433 - Published 6/6/2024 by Logan Kenwright, Partha Roop, Nathan Allen, Sanjay Lall, Calin Cascaval, Tammo Spalink, Martin Izzard
Total Score

0

📈

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Kahn Process Networks (KPNs) are a model for distributed systems that allows non-blocking writes and blocking reads, with the assumption of unbounded buffers between processes.
  • Variants like Finite FIFO Platforms (FFP) have been developed to enforce boundedness.
  • Existing models mix process synchronization with process execution, which this paper aims to decouple.
  • The paper explores an alternative called bittide that decouples execution from synchronization to preserve determinism and boundedness while improving throughput.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a model for designing and understanding distributed systems called Kahn Process Networks (KPNs). KPNs allow processes to write data without waiting, but read data only when it's available, assuming the buffers between processes can hold an unlimited amount of data.

While this model has benefits, it can be challenging to implement in practice. To address this, the researchers explore an alternative approach called bittide that separates the execution of a process from the control needed to coordinate the processes. This separation allows the system to preserve the desirable properties of determinism (predictable behavior) and bounded buffers, while potentially improving the overall throughput, or the rate at which the system can process data.

To understand how these systems work, the researchers define a formal model called Logical Synchrony Networks (LSNs). LSNs describe a network of processes as a graph, where the edges represent fixed delays between a producer process and a consumer process. The paper shows that both the FFP and bittide approaches faithfully implement this LSN abstraction, with bittide being the more performant of the two.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a formal model called Logical Synchrony Networks (LSNs) to describe the behavior of distributed systems like Kahn Process Networks (KPNs). LSNs model a network of processes as a graph, where the edges represent invariant logical delays between a producer process and a corresponding consumer process.

The researchers show that this LSN abstraction is satisfied by KPNs, which support non-blocking writes and blocking reads with the assumption of unbounded buffers. They then demonstrate that both Finite FIFO Platforms (FFPs) and the bittide approach faithfully implement this LSN abstraction.

The key insight of the bittide approach is that it decouples the execution of a process from the control needed for process synchronization. This separation preserves the desirable properties of determinism and boundedness, while potentially offering better overall throughput compared to existing models that mix process synchronization and execution.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a formal framework, Logical Synchrony Networks (LSNs), for understanding the behavior of distributed systems like Kahn Process Networks (KPNs) and their variants. This abstraction is a valuable contribution, as it allows for a clear separation of concerns between process execution and synchronization.

The researchers demonstrate that both Finite FIFO Platforms (FFPs) and the bittide approach faithfully implement the LSN abstraction, with bittide potentially offering better throughput. While this is a promising result, the paper does not provide a detailed performance evaluation or comparison between the two approaches.

Additionally, the paper does not address the practical challenges of implementing the bittide approach in real-world distributed systems. It would be helpful to understand the system requirements, overhead, and potential trade-offs involved in deploying this approach in production environments.

Overall, the paper presents a solid theoretical foundation for understanding deterministic distributed systems and introduces an interesting alternative, bittide, that merits further exploration and empirical evaluation.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a formal model called Logical Synchrony Networks (LSNs) to describe the behavior of distributed systems like Kahn Process Networks (KPNs) and their variants. The key contribution is the exploration of an alternative approach called bittide, which decouples process execution from synchronization to preserve desirable properties like determinism and boundedness, while potentially offering better overall throughput.

The paper establishes a strong theoretical foundation for understanding these distributed systems and provides a basis for further research and development in this area. Future work could focus on empirical evaluations of the bittide approach, as well as exploring its practical implementation challenges and trade-offs in real-world distributed systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

Total Score

0

Logical Synchrony Networks: A formal model for deterministic distribution

Logan Kenwright, Partha Roop, Nathan Allen, Sanjay Lall, Calin Cascaval, Tammo Spalink, Martin Izzard

Kahn Process Networks (KPNs) are a deterministic Model of Computation (MoC) for distributed systems. KPNs supports non-blocking writes and blocking reads, with the consequent assumption of unbounded buffers between processes. Variants such as Finite FIFO Platforms (FFP) have been developed, which enforce boundedness. One issue with existing models is that they mix process synchronisation with process execution. In this paper we address how these two facets may be decoupled. This paper explores a recent alternative called bittide, which decouples the execution of a process from the control needed for process synchronisation, and thus preserves determinism and boundedness while ensuring pipelined execution for better throughput. Our intuition is that such an approach could leverage not only determinism and buffer boundedness but may potentially offer better overall throughput. To understand the behavior of these systems we define a formal model -- a deterministic MoC called Logical Synchrony Networks (LSNs). LSNs describes a network of processes modelled as a graph, with edges representing invariant logical delays between a producer process and the corresponding consumer process. We show that this abstraction is satisfied by KPNs. Subsequently, we show that both FFPs and bittide faithfully implement this abstraction. Thus, we show for the first time that FFPs and bittide offer two alternative ways of implementing deterministic distributed systems with the latter being more performant.

Read more

6/6/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Logical Synchrony and the bittide Mechanism

Sanjay Lall, Calin Cascaval, Martin Izzard, Tammo Spalink

We introduce logical synchrony, a framework that allows distributed computing to be coordinated as tightly as in synchronous systems without the distribution of a global clock or any reference to universal time. We develop a model of events called a logical synchrony network, in which nodes correspond to processors and every node has an associated local clock which generates the events. We construct a measure of logical latency and develop its properties. A further model, called a multiclock network, is then analyzed and shown to be a refinement of the logical synchrony network. We present the bittide mechanism as an instantiation of multiclock networks, and discuss the clock control mechanism that ensures that buffers do not overflow or underflow. Finally we give conditions under which a logical synchrony network has an equivalent synchronous realization.

Read more

7/8/2024

📶

Total Score

0

Building a Verifiable Logical Clock for P2P Networks

Guangda Sun, Tianyang Tao, Yanpei Guo, Michael Yiqing Hu, Jialin Li

Logical clocks are a fundamental tool to establish causal ordering of events in a distributed system. They have been applied in weakly consistent storage systems, causally ordered broadcast, distributed snapshots, deadlock detection, and distributed system debugging. However, prior logical clock constructs fail to work in an open network with Byzantine participants. In this work, we present Chrono, a novel logical clock system that targets such challenging environment. We first redefine causality properties among distributed processes under the Byzantine failure model. To enforce these properties, Chrono defines a new validator abstraction for building fault-tolerant logical clocks. Furthermore, our validator abstraction is customizable: Chrono includes multiple backend implementations for the abstraction, each with different security-performance trade-offs. We have applied Chrono to build two decentralized applications, a mutual exclusive service and a weakly consistent key-value store. Chrono adds only marginal overhead compared to systems that tolerate no Byzantine faults. It also out-performs state-of-the-art BFT total order protocols by significant margins.

Read more

8/14/2024

Granular Synchrony
Total Score

0

Granular Synchrony

Neil Giridharan, Ittai Abraham, Natacha Crooks, Kartik Nayak, Ling Ren

Today's mainstream network timing models for distributed computing are synchrony, partial synchrony, and asynchrony. These models are coarse-grained and often make either too strong or too weak assumptions about the network. This paper introduces a new timing model called granular synchrony that models the network as a mixture of synchronous, partially synchronous, and asynchronous communication links. The new model is not only theoretically interesting but also more representative of real-world networks. It also serves as a unifying framework where current mainstream models are its special cases. We present necessary and sufficient conditions for solving crash and Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus in granular synchrony. Interestingly, consensus among $n$ parties can be achieved against $f geq n/2$ crash faults or $f geq n/3$ Byzantine faults without resorting to full synchrony.

Read more

8/29/2024