Building a Verifiable Logical Clock for P2P Networks

Read original: arXiv:2405.13349 - Published 8/14/2024 by Guangda Sun, Tianyang Tao, Yanpei Guo, Michael Yiqing Hu, Jialin Li
Total Score

0

📶

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Logical clocks are a fundamental tool for establishing the causal ordering of events in distributed systems
  • Prior logical clock constructs fail to work in open networks with Byzantine (untrustworthy) participants
  • Chrono is a novel logical clock system that targets this challenging environment

Plain English Explanation

Distributed systems, like the internet, are made up of many different computers and devices working together. In these systems, it's important to know the order in which things happen, so we can understand the relationships between different events. Logical clocks are a way to keep track of this ordering.

However, traditional logical clocks don't work well in open networks where some of the participants might be untrustworthy or behaving badly (known as Byzantine failures). To address this, the researchers created a new logical clock system called Chrono.

Chrono redefines how we think about the relationships between events in a system with untrustworthy participants. It introduces a new "validator" component that helps build fault-tolerant logical clocks. Chrono also has multiple backend implementations, each with different trade-offs between security and performance.

The researchers used Chrono to build two decentralized applications: a mutual exclusion service and a weakly consistent key-value store. They found that Chrono only adds a small overhead compared to systems that don't tolerate Byzantine failures, and it outperforms state-of-the-art Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) protocols by a significant margin.

Technical Explanation

The key insight of the Chrono logical clock system is its ability to work in the presence of Byzantine failures, where some participants in the distributed system might be untrustworthy or behaving maliciously.

To achieve this, the researchers first redefine the properties of causality among distributed processes under the Byzantine failure model. They then introduce a new "validator" abstraction that helps build fault-tolerant logical clocks. The validator ensures that the logical clock timestamps are consistent and accurate, even in the face of untrustworthy participants.

Chrono includes multiple backend implementations for the validator abstraction, each with different trade-offs between security and performance. For example, one backend might prioritize strong security guarantees, while another might focus on higher throughput.

The researchers applied Chrono to build two decentralized applications: a mutual exclusion service and a weakly consistent key-value store. They found that Chrono only adds a small overhead compared to systems that don't tolerate Byzantine failures, and it outperforms state-of-the-art Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) protocols by a significant margin.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and important contribution to the field of distributed systems by addressing the challenge of building logical clocks that can work in the presence of Byzantine failures. This is a crucial capability for many real-world distributed applications, such as decentralized finance and federated learning.

One potential limitation of the Chrono system is its reliance on the "validator" abstraction, which may introduce additional complexity and overhead in some scenarios. The researchers acknowledge this trade-off and discuss the various backend implementations they have developed to address different performance and security requirements.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the implications of Chrono's use in wider distributed systems, such as its interaction with other components or its scalability in large-scale networks. Further research in these areas could provide valuable insights and inform the broader applicability of the Chrono approach.

Conclusion

The Chrono logical clock system represents a significant advancement in the field of distributed systems, as it provides a way to establish causal ordering of events even in the presence of untrustworthy participants. By redefining the properties of causality and introducing a novel validator abstraction, Chrono enables the development of fault-tolerant distributed applications that can operate in challenging, Byzantine-prone environments.

The researchers have demonstrated the practical applications of Chrono through the implementation of a mutual exclusion service and a weakly consistent key-value store. The promising performance and security characteristics of Chrono suggest that it could have a transformative impact on the design and development of future decentralized systems, helping to unlock new opportunities in areas like decentralized finance and federated learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📶

Total Score

0

Building a Verifiable Logical Clock for P2P Networks

Guangda Sun, Tianyang Tao, Yanpei Guo, Michael Yiqing Hu, Jialin Li

Logical clocks are a fundamental tool to establish causal ordering of events in a distributed system. They have been applied in weakly consistent storage systems, causally ordered broadcast, distributed snapshots, deadlock detection, and distributed system debugging. However, prior logical clock constructs fail to work in an open network with Byzantine participants. In this work, we present Chrono, a novel logical clock system that targets such challenging environment. We first redefine causality properties among distributed processes under the Byzantine failure model. To enforce these properties, Chrono defines a new validator abstraction for building fault-tolerant logical clocks. Furthermore, our validator abstraction is customizable: Chrono includes multiple backend implementations for the abstraction, each with different security-performance trade-offs. We have applied Chrono to build two decentralized applications, a mutual exclusive service and a weakly consistent key-value store. Chrono adds only marginal overhead compared to systems that tolerate no Byzantine faults. It also out-performs state-of-the-art BFT total order protocols by significant margins.

Read more

8/14/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Logical Synchrony and the bittide Mechanism

Sanjay Lall, Calin Cascaval, Martin Izzard, Tammo Spalink

We introduce logical synchrony, a framework that allows distributed computing to be coordinated as tightly as in synchronous systems without the distribution of a global clock or any reference to universal time. We develop a model of events called a logical synchrony network, in which nodes correspond to processors and every node has an associated local clock which generates the events. We construct a measure of logical latency and develop its properties. A further model, called a multiclock network, is then analyzed and shown to be a refinement of the logical synchrony network. We present the bittide mechanism as an instantiation of multiclock networks, and discuss the clock control mechanism that ensures that buffers do not overflow or underflow. Finally we give conditions under which a logical synchrony network has an equivalent synchronous realization.

Read more

7/8/2024

Total Score

0

Tracing Distributed Algorithms Using Replay Clocks

Ishaan Lagwankar

In this thesis, we introduce replay clocks (RepCl), a novel clock infrastructure that allows us to do offline analyses of distributed computations. The replay clock structure provides a methodology to replay a computation as it happened, with the ability to represent concurrent events effectively. It builds on the structures introduced by vector clocks (VC) and the Hybrid Logical Clock (HLC), combining their infrastructures to provide efficient replay. With such a clock, a user can replay a computation whilst considering multiple paths of executions, and check for constraint violations and properties that potential pathways could take in the presence of concurrent events. Specifically, if event e must occur before f then the replay clock must ensure that e is replayed before f. On the other hand, if e and f could occur in any order, replay should not force an order between them. We demonstrate that RepCl can be implemented with less than four integers for 64 processes for various system parameters if clocks are synchronized within 1ms. Furthermore, the overhead of RepCl (for computing timestamps and message size) is proportional to the size of the clock. Using simulations in a custom distributed system and NS-3, a state-of-the-art network simulator, we identify the expected overhead of RepCl. We also identify how a user can then identify feasibility region for RepCl, where unabridged replay is possible. Using the RepCl, we provide a tracer for distributed computations, that allows any computation using the RepCl to be replayed efficiently. The visualization allows users to analyze specific properties and constraints in an online fashion, with the ability to consider concurrent paths independently. The visualization provides per-process views and an overarching view of the whole computation based on the time recorded by the RepCl for each event.

Read more

7/2/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Logical Synchrony Networks: A formal model for deterministic distribution

Logan Kenwright, Partha Roop, Nathan Allen, Sanjay Lall, Calin Cascaval, Tammo Spalink, Martin Izzard

Kahn Process Networks (KPNs) are a deterministic Model of Computation (MoC) for distributed systems. KPNs supports non-blocking writes and blocking reads, with the consequent assumption of unbounded buffers between processes. Variants such as Finite FIFO Platforms (FFP) have been developed, which enforce boundedness. One issue with existing models is that they mix process synchronisation with process execution. In this paper we address how these two facets may be decoupled. This paper explores a recent alternative called bittide, which decouples the execution of a process from the control needed for process synchronisation, and thus preserves determinism and boundedness while ensuring pipelined execution for better throughput. Our intuition is that such an approach could leverage not only determinism and buffer boundedness but may potentially offer better overall throughput. To understand the behavior of these systems we define a formal model -- a deterministic MoC called Logical Synchrony Networks (LSNs). LSNs describes a network of processes modelled as a graph, with edges representing invariant logical delays between a producer process and the corresponding consumer process. We show that this abstraction is satisfied by KPNs. Subsequently, we show that both FFPs and bittide faithfully implement this abstraction. Thus, we show for the first time that FFPs and bittide offer two alternative ways of implementing deterministic distributed systems with the latter being more performant.

Read more

6/6/2024