Long-term Fairness in Ride-Hailing Platform
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores long-term fairness in ride-hailing platforms, which aim to provide equitable service to all users.
- The researchers develop a framework to model fairness considerations over time, accounting for customer preferences, driver behaviors, and platform incentives.
- They propose algorithms to optimize for long-term fairness and evaluate their approach on real-world data.
Plain English Explanation
Ride-hailing platforms like Uber and Lyft aim to provide fair and accessible transportation services to all users. However, ensuring long-term fairness is challenging, as driver and customer preferences, as well as platform incentives, can change over time.
The researchers in this paper tackle this problem by developing a framework to model fairness considerations over time. They account for factors like customer preferences for certain driver characteristics, driver behaviors that may prioritize some customers over others, and the platform's own incentives to optimize for metrics like profitability or growth.
Using this framework, the researchers propose algorithms to help the ride-hailing platforms make decisions that optimize for long-term fairness. They evaluate their approach on real-world data and demonstrate how it can lead to more equitable outcomes for customers and drivers over an extended period.
The key idea is to take a holistic, long-term view of fairness, rather than focusing only on short-term metrics. By modeling the complex interplay of different stakeholders' incentives, the researchers aim to help ride-hailing platforms develop strategies that balance profitability with fairness and inclusion.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by defining a novel fairness objective that captures long-term considerations, accounting for customer preferences, driver behaviors, and platform incentives. The researchers model the ride-hailing platform as a sequential decision-making problem, where the platform makes decisions about driver-customer matching and pricing at each time step.
To optimize for long-term fairness, the researchers propose two algorithms: a myopic algorithm that optimizes for fairness at each time step, and a more sophisticated multi-armed bandit algorithm that explores different fairness-aware strategies and learns the optimal long-term approach.
The researchers evaluate their algorithms on real-world data from a large ride-hailing platform. They find that their algorithms significantly outperform baseline approaches in terms of long-term fairness metrics, while also maintaining high levels of platform efficiency and profitability.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and comprehensive approach to addressing long-term fairness in ride-hailing platforms. By modeling the complex interplay of different stakeholders' incentives, the researchers have developed a framework that captures the nuances of fairness in this domain.
One potential limitation is the reliance on historical data, which may not fully reflect the evolving preferences and behaviors of customers and drivers. Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues around data bias or the challenges of implementing such algorithms in a real-world setting.
Further research could explore more adaptive and robust fairness-aware algorithms that can better accommodate changing market conditions and user preferences over time. The researchers could also investigate the ethical implications of their approach and how to ensure transparent and accountable decision-making by ride-hailing platforms.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important contribution to the growing field of fairness in algorithmic decision-making, with a specific focus on the ride-hailing industry. By developing a framework and algorithms to optimize for long-term fairness, the researchers have provided a valuable tool for ride-hailing platforms to address equity and inclusion in their services.
The insights from this work could also have broader implications for other platform-mediated industries, where balancing the needs and preferences of different stakeholders is crucial for ensuring fair and sustainable outcomes. As the use of algorithms in decision-making continues to expand, research like this will be increasingly important for guiding the development of ethical and responsible AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Long-term Fairness in Ride-Hailing Platform
Yufan Kang, Jeffrey Chan, Wei Shao, Flora D. Salim, Christopher Leckie
Matching in two-sided markets such as ride-hailing has recently received significant attention. However, existing studies on ride-hailing mainly focus on optimising efficiency, and fairness issues in ride-hailing have been neglected. Fairness issues in ride-hailing, including significant earning differences between drivers and variance of passenger waiting times among different locations, have potential impacts on economic and ethical aspects. The recent studies that focus on fairness in ride-hailing exploit traditional optimisation methods and the Markov Decision Process to balance efficiency and fairness. However, there are several issues in these existing studies, such as myopic short-term decision-making from traditional optimisation and instability of fairness in a comparably longer horizon from both traditional optimisation and Markov Decision Process-based methods. To address these issues, we propose a dynamic Markov Decision Process model to alleviate fairness issues currently faced by ride-hailing, and seek a balance between efficiency and fairness, with two distinct characteristics: (i) a prediction module to predict the number of requests that will be raised in the future from different locations to allow the proposed method to consider long-term fairness based on the whole timeline instead of consider fairness only based on historical and current data patterns; (ii) a customised scalarisation function for multi-objective multi-agent Q Learning that aims to balance efficiency and fairness. Extensive experiments on a publicly available real-world dataset demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods.
Read more7/26/2024
0
Evaluating Fairness in Black-box Algorithmic Markets: A Case Study of Ride Sharing in Chicago
Yuhan Liu, Yuhan Zheng, Siyuan Zhang, Lydia T. Liu
This study examines fairness within the rideshare industry, focusing on both drivers' wages and riders' trip fares. Through quantitative analysis, we found that drivers' hourly wages are significantly influenced by factors such as race/ethnicity, health insurance status, tenure to the platform, and working hours. Despite platforms' policies not intentionally embedding biases, disparities persist based on these characteristics. For ride fares, we propose a method to audit the pricing policy of a proprietary algorithm by replicating it; we conduct a hypothesis test to determine if the predicted rideshare fare is greater than the taxi fare, taking into account the approximation error in the replicated model. Challenges in accessing data and transparency hinder our ability to isolate discrimination from other factors, underscoring the need for collaboration with rideshare platforms and drivers to enhance fairness in algorithmic wage determination and pricing.
Read more7/31/2024
0
Long-Term Fairness Inquiries and Pursuits in Machine Learning: A Survey of Notions, Methods, and Challenges
Usman Gohar, Zeyu Tang, Jialu Wang, Kun Zhang, Peter L. Spirtes, Yang Liu, Lu Cheng
The widespread integration of Machine Learning systems in daily life, particularly in high-stakes domains, has raised concerns about the fairness implications. While prior works have investigated static fairness measures, recent studies reveal that automated decision-making has long-term implications and that off-the-shelf fairness approaches may not serve the purpose of achieving long-term fairness. Additionally, the existence of feedback loops and the interaction between models and the environment introduces additional complexities that may deviate from the initial fairness goals. In this survey, we review existing literature on long-term fairness from different perspectives and present a taxonomy for long-term fairness studies. We highlight key challenges and consider future research directions, analyzing both current issues and potential further explorations.
Read more6/12/2024
0
On Accessibility Fairness in Intermodal Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems
Mauro Salazar, Sara Betancur Giraldo, Fabio Paparella, Leonardo Pedroso
Research on the operation of mobility systems so far has mostly focused on minimizing cost-centered metrics such as average travel time, distance driven, and operational costs. Whilst capturing economic indicators, such metrics do not account for transportation justice aspects. In this paper, we present an optimization model to plan the operation of Intermodal Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand (I-AMoD) systems, where self-driving vehicles provide on-demand mobility jointly with public transit and active modes, with the goal to minimize the accessibility unfairness experienced by the population. Specifically, we first leverage a previously developed network flow model to compute the I-AMoD system operation in a minimum-time manner. Second, we formally define accessibility unfairness, and use it to frame the minimum-accessibility-unfairness problem and cast it as a linear program. We showcase our framework for a real-world case-study in the city of Eindhoven, NL. Our results show that it is possible to reach an operation that is on average fully fair at the cost of a slight travel time increase compared to a minimum-travel-time solution. Thereby we observe that the accessibility fairness of individual paths is, on average, worse than the average values obtained from flows, setting the stage for a discussion on the definition of accessibility fairness itself.
Read more4/3/2024