Look Before You Leap: Towards Decision-Aware and Generalizable Tool-Usage for Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2402.16696 - Published 8/29/2024 by Anchun Gui, Jian Li, Yong Dai, Nan Du, Han Xiao
Total Score

0

Look Before You Leap: Towards Decision-Aware and Generalizable Tool-Usage for Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes a framework to make large language models (LLMs) more aware of their decision-making process and able to generalize their tool usage across different tasks.
  • It introduces a training approach that encourages LLMs to explicitly consider the consequences of their actions and learn to use tools effectively.
  • The goal is to enable LLMs to become more reliable and trustworthy assistants by better understanding the implications of their choices.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about making large language models (LLMs), which are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, become more thoughtful and responsible in how they approach problems.

Currently, LLMs can be quite capable at tasks like answering questions or generating text. However, they don't always seem to fully understand the implications of their actions. The researchers want to change this by training LLMs to be more "decision-aware" - to explicitly consider the potential consequences of their choices before deciding what to do.

The key idea is to give LLMs a training process that encourages them to think carefully about using various "tools" (like search engines, calculators, or other information sources) to solve problems. The LLMs learn not just to use the tools, but to evaluate when and how to use them effectively. This helps the LLMs become more reliable and trustworthy assistants, as they develop a better grasp of the impacts of their decisions.

By making LLMs more decision-aware and able to generalize their tool usage, the researchers hope to create AI systems that are more aligned with human values and can be depended on to make thoughtful choices. This could be important as these powerful language models become more integrated into our lives.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a framework called Decision-Aware Tool-Usage (DATU) to train large language models (LLMs) to be more thoughtful and effective in using various tools to accomplish tasks.

The core idea is to augment the standard language model training process with an additional "decision-making" component. During training, the LLM is presented with a task and a set of available tools. It must then decide which tools to use, consider the potential consequences of that choice, and then execute the task.

The model is trained to not just solve the task, but to optimize for both task performance and good decision-making. This is achieved through a multi-task objective that rewards the LLM for accurately predicting the outcomes of its tool usage choices.

The researchers show that LLMs trained with the DATU framework demonstrate several benefits:

  1. They are more "decision-aware" - they can better explain and justify their tool usage choices.
  2. They are more effective at generalizing their tool usage skills to new tasks and environments.
  3. They are better aligned with human preferences, making more thoughtful and trustworthy decisions.

The paper validates these capabilities through a series of experiments on benchmark language tasks, demonstrating the advantages of the DATU approach over standard LLM training.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful and promising approach to making large language models more reliable and trustworthy assistants. By training LLMs to explicitly reason about their decision-making process, the researchers aim to address a key limitation of current models - their lack of understanding about the implications of their actions.

However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations and areas for future work. For instance, the current DATU framework is evaluated on relatively simple language tasks, and it's unclear how well it would scale to more complex, real-world problems. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into potential biases or safety concerns that could arise from this type of decision-aware training.

Further research will be needed to understand the full ramifications of this approach and how it can be refined and improved. Aspects like the choice of training objectives, the types of tools included, and the generalization to open-ended tasks will all require careful consideration.

Overall, the DATU framework represents an important step towards developing more thoughtful and trustworthy AI assistants. By encouraging language models to be more deliberate and transparent about their decision-making, this work could help pave the way for AI systems that are better aligned with human values and can be relied upon to make responsible choices.

Conclusion

The paper proposes a novel training approach called Decision-Aware Tool-Usage (DATU) that aims to make large language models more thoughtful and effective in their use of various tools to accomplish tasks.

By introducing a decision-making component to the standard language model training process, the DATU framework encourages LLMs to explicitly consider the consequences of their choices and learn to use tools judiciously. This leads to LLMs that are more "decision-aware," better able to generalize their tool usage skills, and more aligned with human preferences.

The research represents an important step towards developing AI assistants that are reliable, transparent, and trustworthy. As these powerful language models become more integrated into our lives, approaches like DATU will be crucial for ensuring they make responsible and well-considered decisions.

While the current work has some limitations, it lays the groundwork for further research and refinement in this critical area. Ultimately, the goal is to create AI systems that can be genuine partners to humans, helping us tackle complex problems while maintaining a deep understanding of the implications of their actions.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Look Before You Leap: Towards Decision-Aware and Generalizable Tool-Usage for Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Look Before You Leap: Towards Decision-Aware and Generalizable Tool-Usage for Large Language Models

Anchun Gui, Jian Li, Yong Dai, Nan Du, Han Xiao

Tool-augmented large language models (LLMs) are attracting widespread attention when accessing up-to-date knowledge and alleviating hallucination issues. Nowadays, advanced closed-source LLMs (e.g., ChatGPT) have demonstrated surprising tool-usage capabilities through prompting and in-context learning techniques. To empower the capabilities of open-source LLMs (e.g., LLaMA) in manipulating tools, current efforts focus on either template-driven or token-triggered tool-usage. However, the former hampers LLMs' flexibility to address diverse user's queries due to constrained tool interactions, while the latter limits the generalizability when engaging with new tools, since tool-usage learning is based on task- and tool-specific datasets. To alleviate these concerns, in this paper, we propose a decision-aware and generalizable tool-usage framework (DEER). Specifically, we first construct the tool-usage samples with multiple decision branches via an automatic generation pipeline, thereby inspiring the decision-making awareness of LLMs under diverse scenarios. Meanwhile, we propose a novel tool sampling strategy to enhance the generalizability of LLMs over unseen tools. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed DEER is effective and significantly outperforms baselines across various datasets.

Read more

8/29/2024

Advancing Tool-Augmented Large Language Models: Integrating Insights from Errors in Inference Trees
Total Score

0

Advancing Tool-Augmented Large Language Models: Integrating Insights from Errors in Inference Trees

Sijia Chen, Yibo Wang, Yi-Feng Wu, Qing-Guo Chen, Zhao Xu, Weihua Luo, Kaifu Zhang, Lijun Zhang

Tool-augmented large language models (LLMs) leverage tools, often in the form of APIs, to enhance their reasoning capabilities on complex tasks, thus taking on the role of intelligent agents interacting with the real world. The recently introduced ToolLLaMA model by Qin et al. [2024] utilizes the depth-first search-based decision tree (DFSDT) method for reasoning with $16000+$ real-world APIs, which effectively improves the planning and inferencing performance of tool-augmented LLMs compared to traditional chain reasoning approaches. However, their approach only employs successful paths from decision trees (also called inference trees) for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) during training, which does not fully exploit the advantages of the tree of thought. In this study, we propose an inference trajectory optimization framework based on the preference data extracted from decision trees to address this limitation. We first introduce a novel method for constructing preference data from the tree of thought, capitalizing on the failed explorations previously overlooked in the trees. Specifically, we generate an effective step-wise preference dataset, named ToolPreference, for tool use based on the ToolBench dataset. In the subsequent training phase, we first fine-tune the LLM with tool-usage expert trajectories and then use these step-wise preference pairs for direct preference optimization (DPO) to update the policy of the LLM, resulting in our ToolPrefer-LLaMA (TP-LLaMA) model. Our experiments demonstrate that by obtaining insights from errors in inference trees, TP-LLaMA significantly outperforms the baselines across almost all test scenarios by a large margin and exhibits better generalization capabilities with unseen APIs. At the same time, TP-LLaMA has also demonstrated superior reasoning efficiency compared to the baselines, making it more suitable for complex tool-usage reasoning tasks.

Read more

6/12/2024

MetaTool: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master Tools with Meta-task Augmentation
Total Score

0

MetaTool: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master Tools with Meta-task Augmentation

Xiaohan Wang, Dian Li, Yilin Zhao, Sinbadliu, Hui Wang

Utilizing complex tools with Large Language Models (LLMs) is a critical component for grounding AI agents in various real-world scenarios. The core challenge of manipulating tools lies in understanding their usage and functionality. The prevailing approach involves few-shot prompting with demonstrations or fine-tuning on expert trajectories. However, for complex tools and tasks, mere in-context demonstrations may fail to cover sufficient knowledge. Training-based methods are also constrained by the high cost of dataset construction and limited generalizability. In this paper, we introduce a new tool learning methodology (MetaTool) that is generalizable for mastering any reusable toolset. Our approach includes a self-supervised data augmentation technique that enables LLMs to gain a comprehensive understanding of various tools, thereby improving their ability to complete tasks effectively. We develop a series of meta-tasks that involve predicting masked factors of tool execution. These self-supervised tasks enable the automatic generation of high-quality QA data concerning tool comprehension. By incorporating meta-task data into the instruction tuning process, the proposed MetaTool model achieves significant superiority to open-source models and is comparable to GPT-4/GPT-3.5 on multiple tool-oriented tasks.

Read more

7/19/2024

Building Decision Making Models Through Language Model Regime
Total Score

0

Building Decision Making Models Through Language Model Regime

Yu Zhang, Haoxiang Liu, Feijun Jiang, Weihua Luo, Kaifu Zhang

We propose a novel approach for decision making problems leveraging the generalization capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Traditional methods such as expert systems, planning algorithms, and reinforcement learning often exhibit limited generalization, typically requiring the training of new models for each unique task. In contrast, LLMs demonstrate remarkable success in generalizing across varied language tasks, inspiring a new strategy for training decision making models. Our approach, referred to as Learning then Using (LTU), entails a two-stage process. Initially, the textit{learning} phase develops a robust foundational decision making model by integrating diverse knowledge from various domains and decision making contexts. The subsequent textit{using} phase refines this foundation model for specific decision making scenarios. Distinct from other studies that employ LLMs for decision making through supervised learning, our LTU method embraces a versatile training methodology that combines broad pre-training with targeted fine-tuning. Experiments in e-commerce domains such as advertising and search optimization have shown that LTU approach outperforms traditional supervised learning regimes in decision making capabilities and generalization. The LTU approach is the first practical training architecture for both single-step and multi-step decision making tasks combined with LLMs, which can be applied beyond game and robot domains. It provides a robust and adaptable framework for decision making, enhances the effectiveness and flexibility of various systems in tackling various challenges.

Read more

8/13/2024