LucidDreaming: Controllable Object-Centric 3D Generation

Read original: arXiv:2312.00588 - Published 8/12/2024 by Zhaoning Wang, Ming Li, Chen Chen

🛸

Overview

The provided paper outlines guidelines for authors to follow when preparing their response to peer review comments for a conference submission.
It covers key aspects such as response length, formatting, and content organization.
The guidelines aim to help authors craft an effective and well-structured response that addresses the reviewers' concerns.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a set of guidelines to assist authors in preparing their response to comments received during the peer review process for a conference paper submission. The key points covered include:

Response Length: Providing recommendations on the appropriate length for the author response, typically limited to 1-2 pages.
Formatting: Discussing the preferred formatting, such as using LaTeX for typesetting the response, and following conventions for section headings, text formatting, and referencing.
Content Organization: Suggesting a structure for the response, including sections to acknowledge the reviewers' feedback, address their specific concerns, and explain any changes made to the paper.

The guidelines aim to help authors craft a clear, concise, and well-structured response that effectively addresses the reviewers' comments and strengthens the overall quality of the paper before final submission.

Technical Explanation

The paper outlines a set of guidelines for authors to follow when preparing their response to peer review comments for a conference paper submission. The key technical aspects covered include:

Response Length: The guidelines recommend limiting the author response to 1-2 pages in length, providing a compact and focused format for addressing the reviewers' feedback.
Formatting: The paper suggests using the LaTeX typesetting system for formatting the response, as it offers consistent and professional-looking output. It provides guidance on section headings, text formatting (e.g., font size, spacing), and referencing.
Content Organization: The guidelines propose a structured approach for the author response, including the following sections:
- Acknowledgment: Expressing gratitude for the reviewers' feedback and recognizing their valuable contributions.
- Response to Reviewers' Comments: Addressing each of the reviewers' concerns in a clear and comprehensive manner, explaining any changes made to the paper.
- Changes to the Paper: Summarizing the key modifications made to the paper in response to the reviewers' comments.

By following these guidelines, authors can ensure that their response is well-organized, visually appealing, and effectively communicates their engagement with the reviewers' feedback, ultimately strengthening the quality of the final paper submission.

Critical Analysis

The guidelines presented in the paper provide a structured and systematic approach for authors to prepare their response to peer review comments. This approach is beneficial as it helps ensure that the response is concise, well-formatted, and addresses all the reviewers' concerns in a clear and comprehensive manner.

One potential limitation of the guidelines is that they may not account for the specific requirements or preferences of individual conferences or journals. Authors should carefully review the submission guidelines for the target venue to ensure that their response aligns with any additional formatting or content requirements.

Additionally, while the guidelines suggest a standard structure for the response, there may be cases where authors need to deviate from this format to effectively address complex or nuanced feedback from the reviewers. Authors should maintain a level of flexibility in their approach while still adhering to the core principles outlined in the guidelines.

Overall, the guidelines presented in the paper offer a solid foundation for authors to craft a high-quality response to peer review comments, contributing to the overall strength and clarity of the final paper submission.

Conclusion

The LaTeX Guidelines for Author Response provide a comprehensive set of guidelines to assist authors in preparing their response to peer review comments for a conference paper submission. By following these guidelines, authors can ensure that their response is concise, well-formatted, and effectively addresses the reviewers' feedback, ultimately strengthening the quality of the final paper.

The guidelines cover key aspects such as response length, formatting, and content organization, offering a structured approach that can help authors communicate their engagement with the review process in a clear and professional manner. While the guidelines may not account for all possible scenarios, they offer a valuable starting point for authors to develop a robust and effective response strategy.

By adhering to these guidelines, authors can contribute to the overall quality and clarity of the peer review process, fostering constructive dialogue and helping to advance the field of research.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛸

LucidDreaming: Controllable Object-Centric 3D Generation

Zhaoning Wang, Ming Li, Chen Chen

With the recent development of generative models, Text-to-3D generations have also seen significant growth, opening a door for creating video-game 3D assets from a more general public. Nonetheless, people without any professional 3D editing experience would find it hard to achieve precise control over the 3D generation, especially if there are multiple objects in the prompt, as using text to control often leads to missing objects and imprecise locations. In this paper, we present LucidDreaming as an effective pipeline capable of spatial and numerical control over 3D generation from only textual prompt commands or 3D bounding boxes. Specifically, our research demonstrates that Large Language Models (LLMs) possess 3D spatial awareness and can effectively translate textual 3D information into precise 3D bounding boxes. We leverage LLMs to get individual object information and their 3D bounding boxes as the initial step of our process. Then with the bounding boxes, We further propose clipped ray sampling and object-centric density blob bias to generate 3D objects aligning with the bounding boxes. We show that our method exhibits remarkable adaptability across a spectrum of mainstream Score Distillation Sampling-based 3D generation frameworks and our pipeline can even used to insert objects into an existing NeRF scene. Moreover, we also provide a dataset of prompts with 3D bounding boxes, benchmarking 3D spatial controllability. With extensive qualitative and quantitative experiments, we demonstrate that LucidDreaming achieves superior results in object placement precision and generation fidelity compared to current approaches, while maintaining flexibility and ease of use for non-expert users.

8/12/2024

Interactive3D: Create What You Want by Interactive 3D Generation

Shaocong Dong, Lihe Ding, Zhanpeng Huang, Zibin Wang, Tianfan Xue, Dan Xu

3D object generation has undergone significant advancements, yielding high-quality results. However, fall short of achieving precise user control, often yielding results that do not align with user expectations, thus limiting their applicability. User-envisioning 3D object generation faces significant challenges in realizing its concepts using current generative models due to limited interaction capabilities. Existing methods mainly offer two approaches: (i) interpreting textual instructions with constrained controllability, or (ii) reconstructing 3D objects from 2D images. Both of them limit customization to the confines of the 2D reference and potentially introduce undesirable artifacts during the 3D lifting process, restricting the scope for direct and versatile 3D modifications. In this work, we introduce Interactive3D, an innovative framework for interactive 3D generation that grants users precise control over the generative process through extensive 3D interaction capabilities. Interactive3D is constructed in two cascading stages, utilizing distinct 3D representations. The first stage employs Gaussian Splatting for direct user interaction, allowing modifications and guidance of the generative direction at any intermediate step through (i) Adding and Removing components, (ii) Deformable and Rigid Dragging, (iii) Geometric Transformations, and (iv) Semantic Editing. Subsequently, the Gaussian splats are transformed into InstantNGP. We introduce a novel (v) Interactive Hash Refinement module to further add details and extract the geometry in the second stage. Our experiments demonstrate that Interactive3D markedly improves the controllability and quality of 3D generation. Our project webpage is available at url{https://interactive-3d.github.io/}.

4/26/2024

Coin3D: Controllable and Interactive 3D Assets Generation with Proxy-Guided Conditioning

Wenqi Dong, Bangbang Yang, Lin Ma, Xiao Liu, Liyuan Cui, Hujun Bao, Yuewen Ma, Zhaopeng Cui

As humans, we aspire to create media content that is both freely willed and readily controlled. Thanks to the prominent development of generative techniques, we now can easily utilize 2D diffusion methods to synthesize images controlled by raw sketch or designated human poses, and even progressively edit/regenerate local regions with masked inpainting. However, similar workflows in 3D modeling tasks are still unavailable due to the lack of controllability and efficiency in 3D generation. In this paper, we present a novel controllable and interactive 3D assets modeling framework, named Coin3D. Coin3D allows users to control the 3D generation using a coarse geometry proxy assembled from basic shapes, and introduces an interactive generation workflow to support seamless local part editing while delivering responsive 3D object previewing within a few seconds. To this end, we develop several techniques, including the 3D adapter that applies volumetric coarse shape control to the diffusion model, proxy-bounded editing strategy for precise part editing, progressive volume cache to support responsive preview, and volume-SDS to ensure consistent mesh reconstruction. Extensive experiments of interactive generation and editing on diverse shape proxies demonstrate that our method achieves superior controllability and flexibility in the 3D assets generation task.

5/15/2024

🌀

ControlDreamer: Blending Geometry and Style in Text-to-3D

Yeongtak Oh, Jooyoung Choi, Yongsung Kim, Minjun Park, Chaehun Shin, Sungroh Yoon

Recent advancements in text-to-3D generation have significantly contributed to the automation and democratization of 3D content creation. Building upon these developments, we aim to address the limitations of current methods in blending geometries and styles in text-to-3D generation. We introduce multi-view ControlNet, a novel depth-aware multi-view diffusion model trained on generated datasets from a carefully curated text corpus. Our multi-view ControlNet is then integrated into our two-stage pipeline, ControlDreamer, enabling text-guided generation of stylized 3D models. Additionally, we present a comprehensive benchmark for 3D style editing, encompassing a broad range of subjects, including objects, animals, and characters, to further facilitate research on diverse 3D generation. Our comparative analysis reveals that this new pipeline outperforms existing text-to-3D methods as evidenced by human evaluations and CLIP score metrics. Project page: https://controldreamer.github.io

8/26/2024